Back to @NobelPrize's profile

The Nobel Prize engagement report

@NobelPrize - 1.3M followers on X

Measured over 76 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.033%
of 1.3M followers
Per impression
1.18%
37K views on a typical post
Reach
2.78%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
434
interactions (median)
Saved
0.105%
38 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.53/day
active 70% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 434 interactions against 1.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.033%. Measured over 76 original posts, its engagement rate beats 53% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 37K times each, and 1.18% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.78% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 76 posts sampled, 99% carry an image or video and 54% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.1K interactions, about 7.1x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #nobelprize, #onthisday, #nobelpeaceprize.

Measured over 76 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026. Recurring tags: #nobelprize, #onthisday, #nobelpeaceprize.

Compared with accounts its own size

The Nobel Prize's engagement rate beats 53% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 55% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.033%, The Nobel Prize sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.433%
p902.10%
p99160.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,654 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,977 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.433%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-3%98K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-1%57K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%231K
Monday0%288K
Tuesday-2%278K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%245K
Friday-3%253K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 27, 20267.1x their median

    When you throw a ball at a wall, you can be sure it will bounce back at you. You would be extremely surprised if the ball suddenly appeared on the other side of the wall. In quantum mechanics this type of phenomenon is called tunnelling and is exactly the type of phenomenon that has given it a reputation for being bizarre and unintuitive. The 2025 Nobel Prize laureates in physics John Clarke, Michel H. Devoret and John M. Martinis, used a series of experiments to demonstrate that the bizarre properties of the quantum world can be made concrete in a system big enough to be held in the hand. Their superconducting electrical system could tunnel from one state to another, as if it were passing straight through a wall. They also showed that the system absorbed and emitted energy in doses of specific sizes, just as predicted by quantum mechanics. In a few weeks we will be announcing this year's Nobel Prize in Physics - stay tuned.

    2.6K3365635854K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20265.0x their median

    One of literature laureate Toni Morrison's most impactful books, 'Beloved' starts with a dedication to "sixty million and more" – the Africans who died during the Atlantic slave trade. In the novel, Morrison takes an unflinching look at slavery's horrors and its lasting scars. https://t.co/vpverkbf8A

    1.6K474682081K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20264.9x their median

    "I have a dream that my four children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character" - peace laureate Martin Luther King Jr, 28 August 1963. #NobelPrize https://t.co/9JFI3MYQyT

    1.6K454863253K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20263.3x their median

    #OnThisDay 20 August 1955, Dorothy Crowfoot Hodgkin and her colleagues published the final structure of vitamin B12 which has the most complex structure of all vitamins. https://t.co/yyt2lD3pde

    1.1K286261857K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20262.9x their median

    “The creative process is simply that all cultures and all concerns meet at a certain point, the human point in which everything is related to one another.” Wole Soyinka has been characterised as one of the finest poetical playwrights to have written in English. https://t.co/EgkXihyZw1

    885320231637K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20262.9x their median

    In 2002, Daniel Kahneman received the prize in economic sciences – not as an economist, but as a psychologist. His groundbreaking work brought psychological insight into economics, challenging the idea that humans are purely rational decision-makers. In his bestselling book 'Thinking, Fast and Slow', Kahneman breaks down how we think using two systems: System 1 – fast, intuitive, emotional System 2 – slow, deliberate, logical He revealed how systematic cognitive biases – not just emotions – shape our everyday decisions. From money and risk to leadership and policy, his research changed how we understand human behaviour. This book didn’t just explain the mind – it reshaped economics, finance, healthcare, and public policy. Read more: https://t.co/6TiHHCbhBD

    906274273356K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20262.2x their median

    "They tried hard to educate me but I responded only to physics and mathematics." Medicine laureate Godfrey Hounsfield grew up on a farm and he was intrigued by what machines could do. In the 1960s, he co-developed the CT scan. By 1980, CT scans were a common part of medicine. https://t.co/tsUPRo4OxR

    77013425647K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20262.1x their median

    The Norwegian Nobel Institute and the Norwegian Nobel Committee mourn the passing of King Harald. The Norwegian Nobel Institute and the Norwegian Nobel Committee have received the news of the death of His Majesty King Harald V with deep sadness. Read the full statement here: https://t.co/pDkgtLHOTj

    77810724442K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20262.0x their median

    Hans Krebs identified the citric acid cycle – also known as the Krebs cycle. The cycle is a series of reactions that convert nutrients into other molecules with a large amount of chemical energy. Do you know why it is so important? https://t.co/RRVEQvVCX0

    661150341244K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20261.9x their median

    "School was not easy for me." Carol Greider achieved success in molecular biology in the same way she overcame dyslexia as a child: with persistence and creativity. Greider is one of many Nobel Prize laureates that have dyslexia. https://t.co/UFXypAmEMb

    695129111135K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#nobelprize#onthisday#nobelpeaceprize#otd#didyouknow

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 434 interactions against 1.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.033%. Measured over 76 original posts, its engagement rate beats 53% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 37K times each, and 1.18% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.78% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 76 posts sampled, 99% carry an image or video and 54% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.1K interactions, about 7.1x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #nobelprize, #onthisday, #nobelpeaceprize.

What is The Nobel Prize's engagement rate on X?
The Nobel Prize (@NobelPrize) has an engagement rate of 0.033%, based on the median interactions across 76 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,321,729 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.033%, The Nobel Prize sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @NobelPrize have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 53% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @NobelPrize post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.53 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going