Occupy Democrats engagement report
@OccupyDemocrats - 737K followers on X
Measured over 52 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 1.1K interactions against 737K followers, an engagement rate of 0.143%. Measured over 52 original posts, its engagement rate beats 77% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 24K times each, and 4.35% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.30% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 52 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12K interactions, about 12x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #operationepicfailure, #natalieharp, #scottjennings.
Measured over 52 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026. Recurring tags: #operationepicfailure, #natalieharp, #scottjennings.
Compared with accounts its own size
Occupy Democrats's engagement rate beats 77% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 89% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.143%, Occupy Democrats sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,378 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.08% to 0.432%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.08% |
| 75th percentile | 0.432% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 161.0% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 50K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 51K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 50K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 53K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 43K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 42K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 48K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 52K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 60K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 69K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 72K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 78K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 86K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 94K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 97K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 97K |
| 17:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 84K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 79K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 74K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 66K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 57K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 51K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +4% | 230K |
| Monday | 0% | 286K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 276K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 251K |
| Thursday | -1% | 244K |
| Friday | -3% | 252K |
| Saturday | +3% | 227K |
Best tweets
- Aug 31, 202612x their median
Agreed. We must win the war for AI supremacy over China. They foment the ‘anti’ argument through misinformation. There’s nothing more damaging to a Democrat than agreeing with Trump AND data centers—but what’s right is right. https://t.co/rRzdz0G3qf
- Aug 20, 20267.4x their median
BREAKING: HOLY SMOKES! A jaw-dropping new poll shows Democrat Hallie Shoffner leading MAGA Senator Tom Cotton ahead of the upcoming midterm elections. This would be a political earthquake of historic proportions... The Talk Business & Politics-Hendrix College Poll in question shows Shoffner at 47.4% support and Cotton at 44% with Libertarian Jeff Wadlin bringing up the rear with 3%. 5.65% are still undecided. "Arkansans aren’t changing who they are. They are changing who they are willing to vote for. You don’t have to change your party to want to change your senator," Shoffner wrote on X in response to the poll. "Arkansas deserves better than Tom Cotton. I’m a farmer, wife, mom, daughter, and small business owner who has lived rising costs and a broken system. I’m going to fight for Arkansas instead of Washington," she added. While one poll is just that, one poll, this is incredibly encouraging news. Cotton is one of the most bloodthirsty Israel First politicians in the entire Senate. He's a proud racist, a staunch opponent of expanding affordable healthcare to the American people, and betrays the people of Arkansas regularly to serve corporate interests. Meanwhile, Shoffner supports higher wages, stronger unions, lower healthcare costs, protecting Social Security and Medicare, paid family leave, affordable childcare, higher teacher pay, and stronger rural hospitals. This choice is easy, Arkansas! Hallie Shoffner will fight for you. Please ❤️ and share if you'd love to see Tom Cotton kicked to the curb!
- Aug 29, 20267.2x their median
BREAKING: CNN's Jake Tapper boldly defends journalist Maggie Haberman after Trump launched a "disgusting" attack on her physical appearance after she broke a damaging story about him. This was one of Trump's worst rants to date... "I’m not going to repost the filth the president wrote about Maggie Haberman, but suffice it to say she’s a great person, beautiful inside and out, an incredible mom and wife and colleague, and an amazing journalist," Tapper wrote on X. "The president’s comments are disgusting and beneath the office." "We should never get used to this deterioration in our expectations for how a president should behave. Never," he added. While we certainly understand Tapper's instinct to avoid repeating the smears against his friend, we believe that the American people must never look away from the ugliness that Trump spews. We must confront each new indignity, cruelty, and degradation head on so that we are reminded why this kind of man can never be allowed into power again. To that end— "Maggot Hagerman, the Fake Reporter from The Failing New York Times, an unattractive person both inside and out, and who knows less about me than most reporters on the beat (She’s a SCAMMER!), made up a story that on September 11th, I’m not going to the World Trade Center, in New York City, because they won’t let me make a speech, and I’m going to the Pentagon in D.C., because I’m a featured speaker," Trump wrote on Truth Social. "This is more Corrupt News, I’ve been to New York many times over the years, and no one ever speaks, it’s a 'solemn ceremony!' I never even thought of what Maggot made up, and besides, I would love not to speak, because I’m speaking all the time, and this is a day to remember the victims, and their beautiful family members," he continued. "Maggot Hagerman is a PHONY, and The New York Times knows it! It will all be revealed in the lawsuit against them, and another lawsuit against the organization which gives out the now discredited Pulitzer Prize, because Maggie got one for her 'reporting' on THE RUSSIA, RUSSIA, RUSSIA HOAX, which turned out to be a total CON JOB!" Trump went on, clearly enraged. "If she were ever forced to reveal her 'sources,' you will find out they either don’t exist, or didn’t say what she reported," he wrote. "She’s been falsely writing about me for years — She’s a stalker, and should be forced to turn over any and all money that she’s made through her fake reporting on me. President DONALD J. TRUMP" Haberman reported that Trump will not be attending the 25th anniversary ceremony for 9/11 at Manhattan’s National September 11 Memorial & Museum because they refused his request to give a speech. There is absolutely no reason to distrust her reporting. She's a serious, credible journalist with a sterling track record. If she's reporting this story, it's because she has rock-solid sources to drawn upon. Meanwhile, Donald Trump is a pathological liar who loves the sound of his own voice. Of course he tried to make the 9/11 commemoration event about himself. But he also knows that Haberman's reporting makes him look absolutely awful and he can scarcely afford more bad press with his approval ratings in the toilet and the midterms right around the corner. As for his attack on Haberman, at this point, is anyone still surprised? This man is an avowed misogynist. He despises women and has a long history of making insulting comments about their appearances. We can't convince this man to be anything other than what he is. Our only option is to vote his entire party out of power and prosecute him once we retake the White House. Please like and share if you stand with Maggie Haberman!
- Aug 28, 20266.5x their median
NEW: According to a leaked Pentagon Memo, the US Navy is running out of money and has payroll shortfalls because of Trump’s War Iran. This entire administration is a complete fucking failure. https://t.co/e8HlfO8fQG
- Aug 21, 20264.5x their median
https://t.co/YWBYLu3iwX
- Aug 25, 20264.3x their median
Getting in is the easy part… THE FIX starring Zachary Levi and Liam Neeson is in theaters September 11.
- Aug 31, 20264.1x their median
https://t.co/WCERhUIMHf
- Aug 31, 20263.8x their median
https://t.co/AejpnaBpWr
- Aug 21, 20262.7x their median
BREAKING: SAVAGE! Rosie O’Donnell ends her week subbing for Jimmy Kimmel by burning Trump with a BRUTAL musical parody. On Thursday night, Rosie O'Donnell wrapped up her week guest-hosting Jimmy Kimmel Live! with what might be the most devastatingly clever sign-off of the summer: a full musical parody of "Danny Boy," reimagined as an open letter to Donald Trump. O'Donnell opened by thanking "everyone who's been watching this week, especially the hungry, hungry hypocrite in the White House," before landing one of her sharpest lines yet: "It's kind of weird to think he spent more nights with me this week than Melania." She also joked that her real motivation for guest-hosting wasn't landing her own show, but auditioning to become "the next Golden Bachelorette: Gay Edition" — because, as she put it, "don't you all want to see who gets the final Rosie? God knows I do." But the real showstopper was the finale: a full rewrite of the Irish classic "Danny Boy," dedicated to a "very special boy" and hitting practically every major Trump scandal from this year in one sweeping ballad: "Poor Donny boy, your polls, your polls are falling. Your reflecting pool is green as Mountain Dew. Your wig's a mess, your ballroom is appalling, and with Iran you've bit off more than you can chew. Measles are back, inflation is a-swelling; you post all night, you're sleeping while you work. And what's with all this useless crap you're selling? Hey, sweetie pie, you're driving us all berserk. But there's a way to end this drama. It's time to use that stable-genius brain. Since we all know you'll never be Obama, why not resign and make this country great again?" In four lines, O'Donnell covered a full week's worth of actual news: the botched, algae-green Reflecting Pool renovation, Trump's misbegotten White House ballroom project blocked by federal courts, the resurgence of measles under RFK Jr.'s watch, and the ongoing Iran war stretching well past its promised "few weeks." O'Donnell also thanked Kimmel directly for "reminding everyone that we have the right to free speech in this country, whether Orange Voldemort likes it or not" — a pointed nod to ABC's earlier decision to ban her from performing an unrelated Trump parody song during this same guest-hosting run. Turns out you don't need permission to roast a president. You just need a good melody and better material — and during the week that Rosie O’Donnell subbed for Jimmy Kimmel, Trump gave her plenty of both, as he invariably does. Please like and share to spread O’Donnell’s infectious ditty!
- Aug 21, 20262.7x their median
BREAKING: James Talarico pounces on Ken Paxton's dog torture scandal with the perfect zinger — and then really brings the hammer down on that monster. Texas, your choice could not be more clear... "I wish Ken Paxton would protect puppies the way he protects pedophiles," the Democratic Senate candidate wrote on X. Yesterday, a bombshell story revealed that during his time as state attorney general, Ken Paxton intervened to prevent animal rescue groups from obtaining the research logs for over 400 dogs being experimented on at Texas A&M University. Texas A&M had already disclosed that at least 100 of the animals had experienced pain during the research. Paxton worked hard to keep the truth shielded from the public, because there is simply no cruel, corrupt issue he won't champion. Meanwhile, James Talarico — in addition to being a better candidate by literally every other metric — is also an animal lover. His Christian faith compels him to show stewardship and compassion towards all of God's creation. "You had an event today or earlier today with the Austin Humane Society in which people brought their dogs and puppies. What was that?" news anchor Ali Velshi asked Talarico during an appearance on MS NOW. "What was that about?" "Well, Ken Paxton is anti-puppy and I wish I was joking when I said that, but reports just came out revealing that as Attorney General, Ken Paxton protected a research lab that was notorious for torturing and killing hundreds of puppies," said Talarico. "And then as a state lawmaker in the Texas legislature, Ken Paxton was one of the only votes against a bill to hold animal abusers accountable." "So Ken Paxton never misses an opportunity to do the wrong thing and he won't fight for the little guy, even when the little guy is literally a puppy," continued Talarico. "And so this is a clear contrast in this race. You know, I have four terms in the Texas House where I brought Democrats and Republicans together to pass 60 bipartisan bills," he said. "One of those bills I authored after a fire at a pet resort in my district killed 75 dogs. And that bill requires kennels and pet resorts to have either 24-7 staffing or automatic sprinkler systems. And that bill is going to save the lives of pets across Texas in the years to come." "That's the kind of action we need. I'm going to be a senator for all Texans, including our four-legged Texans," Talarico concluded. Taken in a vacuum, the stark difference between these two candidates on the issue of animals might not be enough to move many voters. But it's part of a much broader pattern of behavior. James Talarico is an upstanding, honest, compassionate man who will advocate for the interests of his constituents. Ken Paxton is a heartless adulterer who accepts bribes and sells out his own voters to increase his own wealth and power. This November, we turn Texas blue! Please ❤️ and share if you're a big fan of James Talarico
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 1.1K interactions against 737K followers, an engagement rate of 0.143%. Measured over 52 original posts, its engagement rate beats 77% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 24K times each, and 4.35% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.30% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 52 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12K interactions, about 12x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #operationepicfailure, #natalieharp, #scottjennings.
- What is Occupy Democrats's engagement rate on X?
- Occupy Democrats (@OccupyDemocrats) has an engagement rate of 0.143%, based on the median interactions across 52 original posts from the last 30 days against 736,758 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.143%, Occupy Democrats sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,378 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @OccupyDemocrats have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 77% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @OccupyDemocrats post?
- Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.23 posts per day across the measured window.