Open Society Foundations engagement report
@OpenSociety - 2.4M followers on X
Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 44 interactions against 2.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 23% of 3,791 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 32K times each, and 0.136% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.32% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 68% carry an image or video, 9% are part of a thread and 36% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 192K interactions, about 4366x its own typical post.
Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026. Recurring tag: #votingrightsact.
Compared with accounts its own size
Open Society Foundations's engagement rate beats 23% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,791 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 13% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.002%, Open Society Foundations sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.08% |
| 75th percentile | 0.433% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 160.5% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 51K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 52K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 50K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 53K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 43K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 42K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 48K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 52K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 61K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 70K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 72K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 78K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 86K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 94K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 97K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 101K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 98K |
| 17:00 UTC | -2% | 91K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 85K |
| 19:00 UTC | -1% | 80K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 74K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 66K |
| 22:00 UTC | -1% | 57K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 52K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +4% | 231K |
| Monday | 0% | 288K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 278K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 251K |
| Thursday | -1% | 245K |
| Friday | -3% | 253K |
| Saturday | +3% | 227K |
Best tweets
- Jul 28, 20264366x their median
I don’t want an AI overview, just give me the Google results! https://t.co/YyA1m9nNCM
- Aug 12, 2026662x their median
Today is the GOAT’s 96th birthday. Love you, dad! 🐐❤️🎂 https://t.co/0HWBTAMh9g
- Jun 19, 202610x their median
On this day in 1865, after white Southerners had extended the enslavement of countless Black people by concealing the Civil War’s end for months, Union troops arrived in Texas. #Juneteenth https://t.co/AlNI2ZdCx6
- Jun 22, 20269.8x their median
“If we want to stop future wars, we must punish the states and their political and military leadership for starting them,” writes Oleksandra Matviichuk (@avalaina). In modern history we have only one precedent: the Nuremberg and Tokyo war crimes trials following World War II. Subsequent tribunals focused on war crimes but not the act of planning and initiating war. While Nuremberg and Tokyo were an essential step toward establishing accountability and justice in the last century, they have created the impression that justice is a privilege of the winners of a settled conflict. But justice is not a bonus— it is an essential human right. In May, 36 countries and the European Union committed to joining a Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression against Ukraine. The efforts were supported by the Center for Civil Liberties (@ccl_ua), the Ukrainian human rights organization led by Matviichuk. “We must break the circle of impunity and establish a special tribunal on aggression to hold them accountable, not just for people in Ukraine, but in order to prevent a next Russian attack to the next nation.”
- Aug 10, 20267.3x their median
Opinion: Donald Trump’s vow to dismantle the international court will inaugurate a new era of impunity. https://t.co/HZ9K3X4VNH https://t.co/p4RKIZcfre
- Aug 4, 20263.3x their median
Meet Nation Station: A grassroots initiative born in response to the Beirut Port explosion in 2020 that continues to show up for its communities. The day after one of the largest non-nuclear explosions in history, Geitawi neighborhood resident Josephine Abou Abdo and four of her neighbors gathered at an abandoned gas station on their street. They quickly started organizing, turning the gas station into a distribution point for crowdsourced bottled water, fresh fruits and vegetables, tarps, and cooked meals. Nation Station, an Open Society grantee, became a staple in the neighborhood, with its restaurant introducing apertivo nights, hosted by migrant or refugee community kitchens to cook their specialty dishes, to generate revenue to subsidize food distribution programs. In 2024, as the war between Israel and Hezbollah destroyed homes and infrastructure across south Lebanon, the mutual aid group launched an emergency response, cooking more than 4,000 meals a day and sending them to shelters in Beirut and Mount Lebanon. In 2026, as Israel has continued to launch attacks on southern Lebanon and other areas, triggering a mass displacement crisis that has overwhelmed state and international relief efforts, Nation Station distributed about 20,000 food packages a week to vulnerable households in heavily impacted areas. Despite the widespread destruction of homes and livelihoods and the daily threat of violence, communities in Lebanon are still coming together to support those in need. Read more about Nation Station: https://t.co/t1pHC1Dznk
- Jun 23, 20262.9x their median
Happy Pride Month 🏳️🌈! We’re celebrating LGBTQI+ wins from across the world that are expanding protections, upholding fundamental human rights, and ensuring justice for everyone. https://t.co/fQfw4l3AGn
- Jun 24, 20262.2x their median
In a lawsuit filed today, the Open Society Justice Initiative @OSFJustice is representing Kimberly Prost, one of the International Criminal Court (ICC) judges who are subject to U.S. sanctions issued by the Trump administration. The suit challenges the legality of these sanctions, which the U.S. government imposed against the judges in connection with their decisions on ICC investigations into alleged crimes in Afghanistan and Palestine. These sanctions are tantamount to a financial death penalty and include asset freezes and travel restrictions. “These judges are being punished for discharging their judicial duties independently by rendering decisions with which the Trump administration disagrees. This is an effort to pressure them to render future decisions more to the administration's liking,” said James A. Goldston, executive director of the Open Society Justice Initiative. This is the fifth lawsuit against these sanctions. In prior cases, courts have found them unconstitutional. This is the first time ICC judges have gone to court themselves to challenge their designation. Judge Prost is venerated for her contributions to international justice. She has been a judge at the ICC since March 2018 and previously held numerous high-level legal positions in Canada and abroad, including within Canada’s Department of Justice, the Commonwealth Secretariat, and the United Nations.
- Jul 4, 20262.1x their median
For many Americans, the 250th anniversary of the nation’s independence is a complicated moment, writes Laleh Ispahani @lispahani in The Contrarian. The country is deeply divided as the White House pursues a war of choice in Iran that most Americans oppose, rounds up members of communities and tears families apart in immigration sweeps, dismantles civil rights protections, and engages in corrupt self-dealing. Love of country doesn’t mean we should overlook its faults. Rather, we should speak up when it falls short of its values: That all people are created equal. That liberty and justice are guaranteed. That a government’s legitimacy comes from the consent of the governed. These shared values define the U.S. as a nation, which is historically rare when other nations are defined by ancestry, religion, or shared history. On this Fourth of July, let’s celebrate the promise and unity inherent in our shared values and continue the work to fulfill them.
- Jun 26, 20262.0x their median
Punishing people who use illegal drugs doesn’t work—and only worsens health, racial, and economic inequities. Harm reduction works. It is a nonjudgmental and evidence-based approach of meeting people who use illegal drugs where they are and helps them to save their own lives and strengthen their families and communities. Harm reduction doesn’t withhold help or support even if people cannot or won’t stop using drugs. It also brings compassion to drug policies and ensures that people who use drugs have their voices heard in policy debates. Examples of harm reduction include administering naloxone to reverse the effects of opioid overdose, overdose prevention sites, and housing first programs. Open Society’s Judy Chang gives three facts about harm reduction.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 44 interactions against 2.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 23% of 3,791 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 32K times each, and 0.136% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.32% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 68% carry an image or video, 9% are part of a thread and 36% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 192K interactions, about 4366x its own typical post.
- What is Open Society Foundations's engagement rate on X?
- Open Society Foundations (@OpenSociety) has an engagement rate of 0.002%, based on the median interactions across 22 original posts from the last 30 days against 2,447,590 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.002%, Open Society Foundations sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @OpenSociety have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 23% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,791 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @OpenSociety post?
- Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.