Back to @PatrickByrne's profile

Patrick Byrne engagement report

@PatrickByrne - 447K followers on X

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 29, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.497%
of 447K followers
Per impression
5.52%
40K views on a typical post
Reach
9.01%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.2K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.818%
330 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.43/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 2.2K interactions against 447K followers, an engagement rate of 0.497%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 91% of 21,624 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 40K times each, and 5.52% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.01% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 99K interactions, about 44x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #blackexcellence, #ovens, #ovensforpedophiles.

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 29, 2026. Recurring tags: #blackexcellence, #ovens, #ovensforpedophiles.

Compared with accounts its own size

Patrick Byrne's engagement rate beats 91% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,624 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 91% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.497%, Patrick Byrne sits above the 50th percentile of the 218,281 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.149% to 0.705%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.149%
p750.705%
p902.63%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 218,281 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 21,721 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.149%
75th percentile0.705%
90th percentile2.63%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video90% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link10% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 90% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 10% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 348 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 28, 202644x their median

    TERRIFYING: During a TikTok live battle, an Algerian Muslim influencer asks a girl why she’s wearing a cross. She says she’s a Lebanese Christian. He then becomes enraged and says he’d spit on her, and threatens to rape her and kill her, declaring that Christians deserve nothing but to be tortured in this world and the afterlife. He has half a million followers and has illegally arrived in France via Spain just a few days ago. This is Islam. And this is how much they hate Christians. Imagine when they become the majority. https://t.co/kiX0NKSM1i

    70K25K2.0K1.2K2.0M viewsView on X
  • Oct 24, 202618x their median

    THIS IS THE MOST POWERFUL F U TO THE DEMOCRATS I HAVE EVER SEEN!!! https://t.co/ugYeEou6Rb

    28K10K1.0K643340K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 202616x their median

    Retard says she would support her 6 and 8 yr old granddaughters getting puberty blockers. She drew the line at tattoos because they are permanent 😂 Retard logic. https://t.co/aNb2TjQumQ

    29K4.3K849307397K viewsView on X
  • Oct 28, 202611x their median

    ¿Por qué los musulmanes odian tanto a las personas que los acogieron como refugiados? ¿NINGUNA GRATITUD? Una anciana blanca está siendo pisoteada por musulmanes en una parada de tren. https://t.co/kXoR6qGwfY

    16K5.5K2.0K4411.2M viewsView on X
  • Jun 9, 20269.9x their median

    What the West Still Doesn’t Get It: Communism’s True Core: The Systemic Lie Most people in the West think they understand communism. They picture bread lines, gulags, failed five-year plans, and the collapsed Soviet Union. They treat it as a discredited economic theory – an experiment that proved that abolishing private property doesn’t work. Case closed, history moved on. This misunderstanding may be the most dangerous intellectual failure of our time. Communism was never primarily an economic system. Economics was the surface. Beneath it lay something far more insidious: a total, systemic, institutionalized commitment to lying. Not occasional dishonesty. Not spin or propaganda in the ordinary sense. Something deeper – a civilizational war against truth itself, waged through every institution, every classroom, every newspaper, every conversation, until reality itself became negotiable and the lie became the air people breathed. The Words We’re Missing The Polish language, forged by decades of living under this system, produced words for this phenomenon that English simply cannot match: Zakłamanie [zah-kwah-MAH-nyeh] – a state of total, pervasive, socially embedded falsehood, a condition in which an entire society is saturated with lies so thoroughly that truth becomes almost inaccessible. Obłuda [ob-woo-dah] – a deep, performative hypocrisy, the gap between what is proclaimed and what is actually practiced, the mask worn so long it begins to feel like a face. These are not words for individual liars. They describe a system – a mode of social organization built on organized mendacity, where the lie is not the exception but the foundation. English has no single word for either concept, and that linguistic gap is not a coincidence. It reflects a gap in experience. Cultures that did not live under communism lack the vocabulary because they lack the wound. And because they lack the vocabulary, they struggle to recognize the thing when it reappears in new clothing. The Continuity: Communism, Leftism, Wokeism What we call wokeism today, or the broader radical left, is not a new phenomenon. It is the same operating system running on updated hardware. The specifics have changed – instead of the proletariat, we have marginalized identity groups; instead of bourgeois class enemies, we have racists and transphobes; instead of socialist realism, we have DEI statements. But the deep structure is the same. That deep structure is this: truth is not discovered, it is assigned. Reality is not something to be understood honestly but something to be narrated strategically. Language is not a tool for communication but a weapon of power. And anyone who resists the approved narrative is not simply wrong – they are dangerous, and must be silenced, shamed, or destroyed. This is zakłamanie in its modern form. This is obłuda wearing a human rights badge. The same movement that insists men can become women will insist, with equal fervor, that questioning this is an act of violence. The same institutions that claim to champion free inquiry systematically suppress dissent. The same people who invoke tolerance as their highest value are among the most intolerant forces in public life. The contradiction is not accidental – it is structural. It is the system working as designed. Why the West Still Doesn’t Get It People who grew up in freedom tend to assume, at some level, that bad actors know they are lying. That somewhere behind the ideological performance, there is a cynical operator who privately acknowledges reality. This assumption is wrong, and it is why Westerners consistently underestimate what they are dealing with. The totalitarian lie, at its mature stage, is not cynical. It is believed. Or rather, it creates a condition in which the distinction between belief and performance collapses entirely. People learn to say things they do not believe so fluently, and for so long, that they lose access to what they actually think. 1/2

    15K5.5K7498882.7M viewsView on X
  • Oct 25, 20269.2x their median

    Black woman explains why she won’t vote for Abdul El-Sayed, and the devastation that Muslims brought to the black community in Michigan. She’s absolutely right to be wary of Arabs and Muslims. All black people should. The Muslim slave trade was 100 times worse than the Atlantic slave trade, and it’s still ongoing. Most Arabs use the term “abeed”, which means slaves, to refer to black people. https://t.co/fAIORARFkE

    15K5.3K264148149K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20268.2x their median

    - SPLC indicted - Heidi Beirich indicted - Gavin Newsom and wife under investigation - Eric Swalwell’s homes raided and electronics seized at the airport - John Bolton plead guilty - James Comey indicted - ActBlue under investigation - Four prosecutors who targeted pro-life activists fired - 3,400 America-hating activist prosecutors fired or resigned. - 455 Medicare and Medicaid fraudsters charged, the most in history. Thank you AG Blanche.

    14K3.8K349176175K viewsView on X
  • Oct 23, 20266.4x their median

    https://t.co/E1cOjUW2dF

    11K2.7K47713675K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20265.7x their median

    Feminists are like Schrödinger’s cat. https://t.co/lHuIYL5V3i

    11K1.6K155138699K viewsView on X
  • Oct 26, 20265.4x their median

    Notice the move. Don’t answer the concern, just laugh at it. When a real worry gets turned into a punchline, the goal isn’t to inform you. It’s to make you feel silly for asking. Ridicule isn’t a rebuttal. Stay sharp, and don’t let anyone laugh you out of your own questions. https://t.co/opxqYdrzFR

    8.7K2.7K406166171K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#blackexcellence#ovens#ovensforpedophiles

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.2K interactions against 447K followers, an engagement rate of 0.497%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 91% of 21,624 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 40K times each, and 5.52% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.01% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 99K interactions, about 44x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #blackexcellence, #ovens, #ovensforpedophiles.

What is Patrick Byrne's engagement rate on X?
Patrick Byrne (@PatrickByrne) has an engagement rate of 0.497%, based on the median interactions across 20 original posts from the last 30 days against 447,431 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.497%, Patrick Byrne sits above the 50th percentile of the 218,281 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @PatrickByrne have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 91% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,624 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @PatrickByrne post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.43 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going