Back to @PeteButtigieg's profile

Pete Buttigieg engagement report

@PeteButtigieg - 3.8M followers on X

Measured over 29 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.104%
of 3.8M followers
Per impression
3.04%
128K views on a typical post
Reach
3.41%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
3.9K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.041%
53 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.3/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 3.9K interactions against 3.8M followers, an engagement rate of 0.104%. Measured over 29 original posts, its engagement rate beats 85% of 3,809 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 128K times each, and 3.04% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.41% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 29 posts sampled, 72% carry an image or video, 7% are part of a thread and 14% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 97K interactions, about 25x its own typical post.

Measured over 29 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Pete Buttigieg's engagement rate beats 85% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,809 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 86% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.104%, Pete Buttigieg sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,960 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.08% to 0.435%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.435%
p902.10%
p99159.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,960 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,518 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.435%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile159.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%73K
11:00 UTC-3%79K
12:00 UTC-2%87K
13:00 UTC-2%96K
14:00 UTC-4%99K
15:00 UTC-2%102K
16:00 UTC-3%99K
17:00 UTC-2%92K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-2%80K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%67K
22:00 UTC-2%58K
23:00 UTC-1%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%233K
Monday0%292K
Tuesday-3%284K
Wednesday-1%253K
Thursday-2%246K
Friday-3%255K
Saturday+3%229K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jun 26, 202625x their median

    This week someone targeted my family for harm with a false report. We’re physically OK, but that doesn’t mean we weren’t harmed. I am beyond furious. Whatever your politics, this is awful, wrong, and can never become normal. https://t.co/72wxaVLzVT

    71K11K13K1.7K13M viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 202610.0x their median

    President Trump tried to kill the single biggest transportation project in America — the Hudson Tunnel project — for nakedly political reasons, eliminating tens of thousands of jobs. That’s illegal, so the courts stopped him. Now he's appealing. America deserves so much better than a President putting political revenge ahead of jobs and safety.

    30K6.7K1.6K128474K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20267.7x their median

    Republicans are losing because they can't run on their record. They can't run on covering up the Epstein files. They can't run on cutting Medicaid. They can't run on stripping SNAP or imposing tariffs. Americans see what is happening - and we are hungry for change. https://t.co/KsaDbP3S2q

    21K5.2K3.9K260366K viewsView on X
  • Jul 24, 20267.2x their median

    When Trump said “I’m not going to start a war,” many Americans believed that promise - and voted for him. When he said his Iran war would be over in a few weeks, many believed that too. Americans today are fed up with the cost of this war - and the lies. https://t.co/HUjC7XjvKF

    21K4.4K2.2K125284K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20266.7x their median

    This is a big deal: Brandon Dukes just flipped a Pennsylvania state House seat held by Republicans for almost 30 years. His victory in Butler County reflects voters' readiness for change, and the trust that he has earned in his district. I'm proud to be in his corner.

    23K2.6K47046231K viewsView on X
  • Jul 11, 20266.5x their median

    You are not alone if you believe that every American should have access to affordable health care, good roads, and great public schools. You are in fact part of a powerful American majority. https://t.co/5kx4m16Efm

    18K3.2K3.6K187367K viewsView on X
  • Jun 19, 20266.4x their median

    Today in Chicago, @BarackObama and @MichelleObama reminded Americans how we can be our best as a country, just as they did during their eight years in the White House. It was a great honor to participate in today’s opening for the Obama Presidential Center, whose purpose of empowering people to make positive change is timely and needed.

    21K2.6K1.3K50225K viewsView on X
  • Jun 13, 20266.3x their median

    The Supreme Court is allowing Republican politicians to wipe out Black political representation and power. We need to make it impossible for politicians or the courts to manipulate these maps once and for all. https://t.co/QOGE2f1Okg

    16K4.1K4.6K308382K viewsView on X
  • Jun 30, 20266.2x their median

    If there's one thing Americans can agree on, it's that there's too much money in politics. But the Supreme Court just decided to demolish some of the last safeguards we had left - creating an even bigger role for special interest spending. We must do whatever it takes - including a constitutional amendment if necessary - to combat the influence of money in our political system.

    19K3.8K1.1K115334K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20266.0x their median

    There will not be another like the Queen of Country, Dolly Parton. Her music spoke to millions across generations, including in our family. And America is a better place because the inspiring and unifying example she set with her spirit of generosity and belonging will endure far into the future, just like her timeless music.

    22K1.4K14913149K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 3.9K interactions against 3.8M followers, an engagement rate of 0.104%. Measured over 29 original posts, its engagement rate beats 85% of 3,809 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 128K times each, and 3.04% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.41% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 29 posts sampled, 72% carry an image or video, 7% are part of a thread and 14% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 97K interactions, about 25x its own typical post.

What is Pete Buttigieg's engagement rate on X?
Pete Buttigieg (@PeteButtigieg) has an engagement rate of 0.104%, based on the median interactions across 29 original posts from the last 30 days against 3,758,224 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.104%, Pete Buttigieg sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,960 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @PeteButtigieg have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 85% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,809 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @PeteButtigieg post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going