Back to @PeterDiamandis's profile

Peter H. Diamandis, MD engagement report

@PeterDiamandis - 416K followers on X

Measured over 52 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.208%
of 416K followers
Per impression
3.02%
28K views on a typical post
Reach
6.87%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
860
interactions (median)
Saved
0.181%
52 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.93/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 860 interactions against 416K followers, an engagement rate of 0.208%. Measured over 52 original posts, its engagement rate beats 79% of 4,085 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 28K times each, and 3.02% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.84% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 52 posts sampled, 6% are part of a thread and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.7K interactions, about 9.0x its own typical post.

Measured over 52 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Peter H. Diamandis, MD's engagement rate beats 79% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (4,085 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 81% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.208%, Peter H. Diamandis, MD sits above the 50th percentile of the 39,683 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.082% to 0.442%.

p100.002%
p250.013%
p50 (median)0.082%
p750.442%
p902.09%
p99149.3%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 39,683 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 93,337 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.013%
50th percentile0.082%
75th percentile0.442%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile149.3%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%55K
01:00 UTC-2%56K
02:00 UTC-4%55K
03:00 UTC-4%58K
04:00 UTC-6%47K
05:00 UTC-4%46K
06:00 UTC-5%53K
07:00 UTC-5%57K
08:00 UTC-4%66K
09:00 UTC-4%76K
10:00 UTC-3%79K
11:00 UTC-3%85K
12:00 UTC-2%94K
13:00 UTC-3%103K
14:00 UTC-3%106K
15:00 UTC-1%109K
16:00 UTC-3%106K
17:00 UTC-2%99K
18:00 UTC-1%92K
19:00 UTC-2%87K
20:00 UTC-1%81K
21:00 UTC-1%72K
22:00 UTC-1%62K
23:00 UTC-2%56K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%246K
Monday+1%315K
Tuesday-3%330K
Wednesday-3%278K
Thursday-2%256K
Friday-3%267K
Saturday+3%240K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 22, 20269.0x their median

    The best longevity advice right now is embarrassingly simple: sleep 8 hours, move your body, eat real food, manage your stress, and cultivate an optimistic mindset. Don't die from something stupid.

    6.8K60522768232K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20267.7x their median

    Everyone knows the trillion-dollar version of SpaceX. Almost nobody remembers that Elon's first rocket failed three times, and there was money for exactly only one more attempt. DO NOT be afraid to fail.

    6.3K2518814234K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20266.0x their median

    Elon predicted 100x gains in AI intelligence at fixed model size. It was at the edge of plausibility when he said it. Turns out it's now a fact. We are nowhere near the ceiling.

    4.9K19711315340K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20265.3x their median

    Most of what is frightening you about the future was probably written by people with no intention of building any of it.

    3.9K49919731529K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20263.9x their median

    While pessimism sounds smart, optimism makes money by turning life-changing technologies into reality.

    2.7K36822130365K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20262.4x their median

    Reusable rockets broke the cost curve, and when the price of orbit collapses, we're going to open an entire economy above your head. Welcome to [soon] to space.

    1.8K125137486.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20262.4x their median

    Optimists live 11–15% longer and are far more likely to reach age 85. That's not a motivational poster... If you don't believe me, it's peer-reviewed research on a study of 70,000+ people.

    1.8K1679745300K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20262.3x their median

    A robot outran Usain Bolt. A personalized cancer vaccine passed Phase 3. A virtual human cell went live. A million daily drone deliveries got announced. That was ONE week. What's the most underrated story I missed?

    1.7K1531111464K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20262.2x their median

    Scarcity is NOT the natural state of the world. Did you know we produce food to feed 10 billion people, have enough sunlight to power all of civilization, and now have unlimited access to humanity's entire knowledge?  This is a LOGISTICS problem.

    1.5K1641732539K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20262.1x their median

    Imagine I handed you 10,000 brilliant employees tonight. What would you do with them tomorrow morning? That's exactly what AI agents are about to give you. Most people have no answer.

    1.4K1292352756K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 860 interactions against 416K followers, an engagement rate of 0.208%. Measured over 52 original posts, its engagement rate beats 79% of 4,085 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 28K times each, and 3.02% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.84% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 52 posts sampled, 6% are part of a thread and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.7K interactions, about 9.0x its own typical post.

What is Peter H. Diamandis, MD's engagement rate on X?
Peter H. Diamandis, MD (@PeterDiamandis) has an engagement rate of 0.208%, based on the median interactions across 52 original posts from the last 30 days against 416,236 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.208%, Peter H. Diamandis, MD sits above the 50th percentile of the 39,683 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @PeterDiamandis have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 79% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (4,085 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @PeterDiamandis post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.93 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going