Back to @Princeton's profile

Princeton University engagement report

@Princeton - 560K followers on X

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.006%
of 560K followers
Per impression
0.5%
7.3K views on a typical post
Reach
1.30%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
36
interactions (median)
Saved
0.055%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 36 interactions against 560K followers, an engagement rate of 0.006%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 28% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.3K times each, and 0.5% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.30% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 56% carry an image or video and 94% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 177 interactions, about 4.9x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #lewiscenterforthearts, #princeton2030.

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026. Recurring tags: #lewiscenterforthearts, #princeton2030.

Compared with accounts its own size

Princeton University's engagement rate beats 28% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 34% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.006%, Princeton University sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.433%
p902.10%
p99160.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,654 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,977 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.433%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-3%98K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-1%57K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%231K
Monday0%288K
Tuesday-2%278K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%245K
Friday-3%253K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 17, 20264.9x their median

    "He was brilliant from the beginning. Even as a graduate student, without experience ... he was very good at getting at the essence of the thing, picking up what matters in a problem." — Princeton professor Alexandru Ionescu on 2026 Fields Medalist Yu Deng *15 https://t.co/w59gY1ygh6

    156192019K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20263.4x their median

    "He's a brilliant problem solver. He can learn anything." — Princeton professor Peter Sarnak on 2026 Fields Medalist Jacob Tsimerman *11 https://t.co/zMaG4QQvzc

    105142013K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20262.3x their median

    They're here! New students and members of #Princeton2030 arrived today. 📦 Welcome home, Tigers. 🐅 https://t.co/4FBBMsF9eQ

    64117211K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20261.7x their median

    Princeton alumni in humanities disciplines learn to think critically and creatively, embrace complexity and navigate uncertainty. These hallmarks of a liberal arts education help them excel wherever their career paths take them. https://t.co/iJWl5rpLn9

    4497112K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20261.7x their median

    "The analytical, academic rigor that I experienced at @PrincetonSPIA has carried over to my career covering sports, especially at a time when we’re interested in the intersection of sports and society." — @seanmgregory '98 🔗: https://t.co/vN3fCdX39P https://t.co/QgPequtDY9

    38173213K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 2026

    Princeton classics professor Barbara Graziosi talks with @WBUR about how "The Odyssey" compares to other adaptations: https://t.co/dlTiXAKCqs https://t.co/pAyPpz6Zn9

    415208.8K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 2026

    While we don’t know with any certainty which research will produce the next blockbuster result or scientific miracle, history tells us they are most likely to come from universities. Nathalie de Leon's cutting-edge work with diamonds is creating (comparatively) stable quantum states, using nitrogen vacancies, that are already useful for precision sensors. She has also identified new properties that her diamond-based quantum sensors can detect, which could lead to developing revolutionary new materials in the decades to come. “With fundamental research, we are expanding the sum of human knowledge," she says. Read more about her work and the next big research breakthrough at Princeton: https://t.co/82BhpuGdy6

    375227.3K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 2026

    Princeton professors Eve Krakowski and Marina Rustow have received grants from @NEHgov for projects connected with Princeton’s @GenizaLab, which studies a cache of more than 400,000 ancient paper and parchment documents recovered from a synagogue in Cairo: https://t.co/cVcOHHdAFV Krakowski received funding or the project "Living with Death in Medieval Egypt: Editions and Translations of a Cairo Geniza Corpus," which explores the social history of death in the medieval Middle East through documents including mourning and condolence letters, service contracts and accounts. Rustow received funding for the project "Indian Ocean Documents from the Cairo Geniza," which will publish editions and translations of three volumes of letters, legal documents and account ledgers by Jewish traders from North Africa, Sicily, Egypt and Yemen as they navigated the medieval Indian Ocean trade with the Mediterranean. These texts date from 1080 to 1250 and will be translated to English from Judeo-Arabic, Hebrew and Aramaic, both in print and digitally.

    357206.7K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 2026

    One of the books Ben Xinzi Zhang, a lecturer in the Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, keeps on his bookshelf is "Braiding Sweetgrass: Indigenous Wisdom, Scientific Knowledge and the Teachings of Plants" by Robin Wall Kimmerer. "So many of the ideas in this book — the gift economy, reciprocity and the sense of place that permeates Indigenous wisdom — are ideas that I use with students. Kimmerer talks about the meaning of harvest and what it means to grow in symbiosis with nature. As scientists, our 'harvest' is the observations we make in the world and the knowledge we produce for the benefit of humanity. Kimmerer discusses the concept of an honorable harvest. I ask my students: What is our place, as aspiring scientists, in that process, and what makes our harvest honorable? We talk about not just the end product of science but about the humility and enrichment you gain in the process of collaboration and discovery." Find more summer reading inspiration from Princeton professors: https://t.co/19rAVJ7rAB

    287307.1K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 2026

    What is associate professor of linguistics Lauren Kalin reading this summer? "A Deadly Education" by Naomi Novik. "This is the first book in the Scholomance trilogy, which I reread with relish every summer. Fantasy is my favorite genre. The Scholomance is a magical, sentient school built to protect young wizards, whose blossoming abilities attract evil creatures. The books center on one girl’s journey coming to terms with her own extraordinarily powerful magic and taking on the problems of the magical community." More summer reads from Princeton professors: https://t.co/jythfQ9rZ0

    323006.8K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#lewiscenterforthearts#princeton2030

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 36 interactions against 560K followers, an engagement rate of 0.006%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 28% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.3K times each, and 0.5% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.30% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 56% carry an image or video and 94% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 177 interactions, about 4.9x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #lewiscenterforthearts, #princeton2030.

What is Princeton University's engagement rate on X?
Princeton University (@Princeton) has an engagement rate of 0.006%, based on the median interactions across 18 original posts from the last 30 days against 560,139 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.006%, Princeton University sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Princeton have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 28% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Princeton post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going