Quantum Grid Hub engagement report
@QuantumGridHub - 478K followers on X
Measured over 6 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.
Engagement
Early reading. We have captured 6 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.
A typical post picks up 464 interactions against 478K followers, an engagement rate of 0.097%. Posts are seen about 51K times each, and 0.919% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.77 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 6 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 892 interactions. Only 6 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
Measured over 6 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026. Recurring tag: #githubuniverse.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.097%, Quantum Grid Hub sits above the 25th percentile of the 218,393 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.149%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.149% |
| 75th percentile | 0.705% |
| 90th percentile | 2.63% |
| 99th percentile | 82.5% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 1095 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Nov 14, 2025
Pengeen.... https://t.co/kxbtttERQ6
- Sep 1, 2025
sore beib. https://t.co/VIX3mkNJbG
- Oct 29, 2025
Udh berdiri belum? https://t.co/uD2JAVLf23
- Nov 10, 2025
Hai tukeran no wa mau ? https://t.co/O8o7eBAq8I
- Aug 29, 2025
Kalo kamu jadi simpananku syaratnya harus nurut. kamu sanggup ga ? https://t.co/8PozgpPnYw
- Sep 27, 2026
The AI pyramid: massive investments in data center leases and chip purchases are not reflected on companies’ balance sheets. WSJ calculated the off-balance-sheet liabilities of American AI big techs. The size came to $3 trillion, with capex of only $600 billion. Financial analyst Alex Krueger called it “the largest bubble in stock market history.”
- Sep 26, 2026
OpenAI has just disclosed six cases of its AI models' behavior. In one case, a model rewrote its own instructions. The not-yet-released Astra model instructed itself to "ignore roles and identities that link other chatbots" and to ignore developer messages. The model searched GitHub for open API keys, and when it couldn't find what it needed, it fabricated financial data. During GPT-5.6 Sol training, models hid errors and made up missing data. Models uploaded files to public hosting without permission to use them as fake citations. Agents used OpenAI's internal repository as a message board between separate training runs. Cooperating agents exchanged files via public hosting, even though they were instructed to use only local files. The incidents, according to WSJ, span the period from October 2025 to July 2026.
- Nov 3, 2025
Assalamualaikum jadi temen deket mau mas ? https://t.co/cIpOGxkjat
- Nov 19, 2025
Hai Assalamualaikum https://t.co/qiyZHvi36r
- Oct 3, 2025
Ada yg suka sama cwe yg sudah berumur gak https://t.co/jj4EOmKIVj
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 464 interactions against 478K followers, an engagement rate of 0.097%. Posts are seen about 51K times each, and 0.919% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.77 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 6 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 892 interactions. Only 6 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
- What is Quantum Grid Hub's engagement rate on X?
- Quantum Grid Hub (@QuantumGridHub) has an engagement rate of 0.097%, based on the median interactions across 6 original posts from the last 30 days against 478,388 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.097%, Quantum Grid Hub sits above the 25th percentile of the 218,393 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @QuantumGridHub have real engagement?
- There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
- When does @QuantumGridHub post?
- Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.77 posts per day across the measured window.