Back to @RFA_Chinese's profile

自由亚洲电台 engagement report

@RFA_Chinese - 1.8M followers on X

Measured over 30 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.01%
of 1.8M followers
Per impression
0.304%
56K views on a typical post
Reach
3.20%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
170
interactions (median)
Saved
0.022%
12 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.47/day
active 73% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 170 interactions against 1.8M followers, an engagement rate of 0.01%. Measured over 30 original posts, its engagement rate beats 45% of 3,809 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 56K times each, and 0.304% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.20% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 30 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 43% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.4K interactions, about 8.3x its own typical post.

Measured over 30 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

自由亚洲电台's engagement rate beats 45% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,809 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 27% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.01%, 自由亚洲电台 sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,960 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.435%
p902.10%
p99159.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,960 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,518 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.435%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile159.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%73K
11:00 UTC-3%79K
12:00 UTC-2%87K
13:00 UTC-2%96K
14:00 UTC-4%99K
15:00 UTC-2%102K
16:00 UTC-3%99K
17:00 UTC-2%92K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-2%80K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%67K
22:00 UTC-2%58K
23:00 UTC-1%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%233K
Monday0%292K
Tuesday-3%284K
Wednesday-1%253K
Thursday-2%246K
Friday-3%255K
Saturday+3%229K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jul 26, 20268.3x their median

    【一只流浪狗之死,以及随之而来的公众愤怒和压制】 一只流浪狗的死亡,为什么会让无数中国网友愤怒,甚至把讨论推向足球场、美日意各国 ,还引发海外动物保护组织关切?不过,要求立法保护动物的呼声,却不断受到压制,有参与声援的网民被警察“关切”;在上海,一场平常的动物领养活动也被迫取消。与此同时,网络审查持续升级。与“旺旺事件”有关的内容难以正常发布,即使成功发出,也往往会遭到限流或删除。

    1.1K218741371K viewsView on X
  • Jul 15, 20267.0x their median

    【香港国安警再对两家书店动手 拘捕五人】 香港两间独立书店,留下书舍,及田园书屋,15日遭到香港警方上门搜查,并采取拘捕行动。香港多家媒体报导,留下书舍的三人,及田园书屋的两人,被指涉嫌触犯23条下的煽动罪被捕。15号下午四点半及五点50分,警方在两书店内将店员带走,并从书店取走多箱物品。 https://t.co/J2gB5oGlRv

    83517315126109K viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 20265.8x their median

    【境外网站写加班经历 中国网民被控寻衅滋事】 一名中国网民在境外网站填写前公司的作息和加班情况,发布不足12小时,被公安局以“涉嫌寻衅滋事罪”刑事拘留。 https://t.co/9uD5uaz619

    7991087015108K viewsView on X
  • Jul 25, 20264.3x their median

    【香港言论红线模糊 禁书台湾大卖】 香港警方搜查两家独立书店,被拘捕店员穿着“我是书店店员”T恤,抬头挺胸被拘捕的画面引发震撼,也成为香港出版历史上一个标志性象征。 在台湾,文化界再掀起一波支持香港言论自由的声浪。“我是书店店员”成为响亮的口号。而列为“禁书”之一的“唯红花绽放”也大卖。 香港紧缩出版自由,使得台湾更珍惜民主空间,但无论北京或香港,似乎都不再在意外界的反应或对台的反作用力?

    58210337772K viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 20264.2x their median

    【专访】中国社会活动人士孙愿平抵达澳大利亚寻求政治庇护。他向本台讲述多年被限制出境,以及最终离开中国的经历。 https://t.co/fNErkp4gJQ

    54849120185K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20263.7x their median

    武汉八九学运人士张毅在拉萨向藏人展示达赖喇嘛照片后被警方带走,随后因涉嫌“煽动分裂国家罪”被捕。 从最初被告知“15天”,到收到正式逮捕通知,张毅之子张弘远接受RFA专访,讲述父亲被捕经过。 https://t.co/sssL88CIyL

    36375175976K viewsView on X
  • Jul 14, 20263.5x their median

    【三十款VPN被列入识别名单】 【中国翻墙用户遭流量筛查】 网络安全主题账号NetAskari发布一组“VPN翻墙识别情报库”页面截图,并指相关文件来自中国网络安全企业任子行。相关识别文件在7月初多次更新。 截图列出蓝灯、迷雾通、天喵VPN、绿茶VPN等三十多款代理软件。截图显示,相关识别文件在7月1日、3日、4日和8日连续更新,其中8日一天出现两个版本。部分文件说明提到网络地址频繁变化、区域流量集中和传输模式异常等特征。

    424621062182K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20262.7x their median

    香港高等法院裁定,已经解散的香港支联会及两名前领导人“煽动颠覆国家政权罪”成立。本案的争议焦点之一,是支联会长期提出的政治主张,“结束一党专政”。 1989年学生运动领袖王丹认为,这项判决意在进一步压缩香港公开纪念六四的空间。他说,“沉默的纪念也是一种纪念”。 https://t.co/pOQswY6xmm

    3075389662K viewsView on X
  • Jul 16, 20262.3x their median

    【洪水之后广西上演现实版“动物大逃亡”】 近日,广西遭遇严重洪涝灾害,官方通报已造成至少39人死亡、约13万人紧急转移。随着洪水退去,人们却发现另一场危机正在上演:动物园围栏被冲毁,斑马、鸵鸟等动物四处逃散;一家蛇类养殖场也被淹没,数百条蛇被洪水冲出,其中包括眼镜蛇。 与此同时,当地部分刚完成重建的水利设施发生垮塌,也引发不少网民质疑工程质量和防洪能力。 一场洪水,带来的不仅是眼前的灾情,也暴露出更多值得关注的公共安全问题。

    3195515150K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20262.2x their median

    中国艺术家高兟在2005年至09年以多部创作批判毛泽东,前天被河北省三河市法院以“侵害英雄烈士名誉、荣誉罪”判处有期徒刑3年。这项起诉、判决被质疑:为什么能以现在才通过生效的法律,去追诉十几、二十年前的创作行为? (图为宣判当天,前来关注高兟案的欧盟、美国及另一国外交代表被拒绝进入法院旁听。)

    19045137357K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 170 interactions against 1.8M followers, an engagement rate of 0.01%. Measured over 30 original posts, its engagement rate beats 45% of 3,809 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 56K times each, and 0.304% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.20% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 30 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 43% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.4K interactions, about 8.3x its own typical post.

What is 自由亚洲电台's engagement rate on X?
自由亚洲电台 (@RFA_Chinese) has an engagement rate of 0.01%, based on the median interactions across 30 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,754,286 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.01%, 自由亚洲电台 sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,960 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @RFA_Chinese have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 45% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,809 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @RFA_Chinese post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.47 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going