Back to @RSherman_25's profile

Richard Sherman engagement report

@RSherman_25 - 1.8M followers on X

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.005%
of 1.8M followers
Per impression
0.088%
97K views on a typical post
Reach
5.42%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
86
interactions (median)
Saved
0.007%
6 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.7/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 86 interactions against 1.8M followers, an engagement rate of 0.005%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 35% of 3,791 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 97K times each, and 0.088% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.42% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.7 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 58% carry an image or video and 75% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 41K interactions, about 459x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #samdarnold, #mikemacdonald, #superbowl.

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026. Recurring tags: #samdarnold, #mikemacdonald, #superbowl.

Compared with accounts its own size

Richard Sherman's engagement rate beats 35% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,791 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 7% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.005%, Richard Sherman sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,759 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.434%
p902.10%
p99160.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,759 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,964 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.434%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%79K
12:00 UTC-2%87K
13:00 UTC-3%95K
14:00 UTC-4%98K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-4%99K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%58K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%232K
Monday0%290K
Tuesday-2%281K
Wednesday-1%252K
Thursday-2%245K
Friday-3%254K
Saturday+3%228K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Apr 19, 2026459x their median

    Draft week blockbuster: The Giants are trading three-time Pro Bowl defensive tackle Dexter Lawrence to the Bengals in a deal that will include the 10th overall pick going to New York, per ESPN sources. The Giants now head into Thursday night with the 5th and 10th overall picks. https://t.co/cV6Qobp6Aq

    32K4.0K1.8K3.5K13M viewsView on X
  • Apr 9, 2026296x their median

    The Jaguars are officially making Travis Hunter a full-time cornerback, per @RapSheet. Hunter will have some gadget plays on offense, but no longer the 50/50 split as he did winning the Heisman at Colorado. https://t.co/STbttdScOq

    22K1.3K8601.1K8.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 2026149x their median

    The fact that Richard Sherman fought EA to get his entire unit the spotlight was so fire https://t.co/THjOG9SyUO

    13K4123915642K viewsView on X
  • Apr 18, 202664x their median

    One of the best seasons ever Thrown at 35 times 4 completions 10 INT 21 PBU 0 TD’s allowed 85 tackles 1 fumble recovery And changed his entire stance & technique when this ppl said you can’t do that https://t.co/7f8I6ujbBM

    5.0K4434070487K viewsView on X
  • Apr 28, 202659x their median

    Less interceptions. Same elite play. So what changed? “Man, f*** them hands.” Charles Woodson on why DBs aren’t getting picks anymore… https://t.co/ldlwi6zYqE

    4.7K3339267879K viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 202637x their median

    Some big names eligible for the @ProfootballHOF in 2027 👀 https://t.co/NHLETbiien

    2.8K24310952635K viewsView on X
  • Mar 18, 202634x their median

    .@champbailey talks who was the BEST DB and GOAT Corners! “#CharlesWoodson is the BEST DB to EVER play the Game” - @champbailey NEW EP: https://t.co/uLtYL5Qu6h https://t.co/RfGBzOxTG4

    2.2K468107126303K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 202631x their median

    Sherm enters the Hall of Fame conversation. @RSherman_25 https://t.co/4RhWIFzDz5

    2.4K2312416116K viewsView on X
  • Apr 10, 202616x their median

    🤷🏾‍♂️ makes sense to me

    1.3K62584327K viewsView on X
  • May 2, 202613x their median

    "I'm a Seahawk now" https://t.co/nDc600J879

    1.1K5546254K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#samdarnold#mikemacdonald#superbowl

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 86 interactions against 1.8M followers, an engagement rate of 0.005%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 35% of 3,791 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 97K times each, and 0.088% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.42% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.7 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 58% carry an image or video and 75% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 41K interactions, about 459x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #samdarnold, #mikemacdonald, #superbowl.

What is Richard Sherman's engagement rate on X?
Richard Sherman (@RSherman_25) has an engagement rate of 0.005%, based on the median interactions across 12 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,792,354 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.005%, Richard Sherman sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,759 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @RSherman_25 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 35% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,791 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @RSherman_25 post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.7 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going