Candace Owens engagement report
@RealCandaceO - 7.8M followers on X
Measured over 76 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 11K interactions against 7.8M followers, an engagement rate of 0.147%. Measured over 76 original posts, its engagement rate beats 89% of 3,739 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 908K times each, and 1.26% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 76 posts sampled, 46% carry an image or video and 14% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 94K interactions, about 8.2x its own typical post.
Measured over 76 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Candace Owens's engagement rate beats 89% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,739 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 63% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.147%, Candace Owens sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,378 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.08% to 0.432%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.08% |
| 75th percentile | 0.432% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 161.0% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 50K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 51K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 50K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 53K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 43K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 42K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 48K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 52K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 60K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 69K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 72K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 78K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 86K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 94K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 97K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 97K |
| 17:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 84K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 79K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 74K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 66K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 57K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 51K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +4% | 230K |
| Monday | 0% | 286K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 276K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 251K |
| Thursday | -1% | 244K |
| Friday | -3% | 252K |
| Saturday | +3% | 227K |
Best tweets
- May 31, 20268.2x their median
I’m not sure what I was expecting but I wasn’t expecting this. Moscow is an unbelievably beautiful city. https://t.co/q35ZthjxxK
- Aug 14, 20267.7x their median
Andrew Wilson’s finest moment will be remembered as the time that a woman made him look like a retard seven times over in front of millions of people. https://t.co/zmQ2MwL5HH
- Aug 14, 20267.3x their median
Been saying a lot lately on the show that I am finally able to smile more when I reflect on Charlie. The anger and grief has transformed into something else: Like he’s with us, somehow. Charlie was the one who aggressively trained me how to debate. With flashcards— on the topic of BLM. Day in and day out. “Stay calm” “Know the subject inside and out” “Stay away from personal attacks”. I can almost hear him. Today felt like an absolute cakewalk of a debate on a subject that I care about, deeply. The student has become the master, Charlie.
- Aug 14, 20266.3x their median
How does one agree to pay $300,000 to debate a criminal case when they don’t even know what the suspect is charged with? What is that? 💀
- Aug 15, 20265.6x their median
Just seeing that our debate yesterday has eclipsed 3.1 million views in 18 hours. Truly amazing. Thank you to everyone who took the time to watch. This really was such a great win for those of us who have kept our heads down and studied this case from the very first filing, while being relentlessly attacked from people who, as Andrew Wilson so perfectly demonstrated, know literally nothing about it. Will have much more to say on Monday but wanted to just thank our audience for taking the time to watch. 🙏 https://t.co/XzuXfuSmDn
- Aug 31, 20264.0x their median
So many memories that make me smile now. ✝️ https://t.co/OkBiIO32Yp
- Aug 11, 20263.9x their median
I’m not above admitting that I’m enjoying the absolute crash out from people attempting to cope with the uncompressed images of maroon boy in the parking garage. Through their many tears and false hopes that we somehow edited the image (we did not), what they are actually doing is conceding that it does not look anything like Tyler Robinson. We win. Give them time. Everybody grieves differently.
- Aug 9, 20263.7x their median
Okay now that I’ve learn that it is a Jewish woman, Clarissa Goldemberg, who is the admin of the chat of 92 people who were sharing information about me and my family, I am actually am going to file a report. You will recall last year we had a would-be Jewish terrorist who was plotting my murder on a group chat that similarly grew increasingly radical and obsessive until the FBI stepped in. That man is currently in prison after he pled guilty. I have learned that within this “protect Erika Kirk” group chat they not only were sharing our personal information, but were sharing photos and trying to match my kitchen according to a Russell Brand interview I did. I am of the belief that when an actual member of the chat opts to leave because it is growing too deranged, you should take their word for it and protect your children. Britta Weidner sending 4,040 tweets about me in the span of just 10 months is evidence of a real obsessive derangement. @iamcoachcolin —you were also discussed in this chat and they were trying to run your personal information as well. @paramounttactcl specifically was looking for your personal information and I have the messages if you need them.
- Aug 14, 20263.7x their median
🚨 THIS is the moment that will be remembered from the entire debate. Andrew Wilson was asked to name ONE charge against Tyler Robinson. He couldn’t. Andrew started spiraling as Candace Owens proceeded to name all 7 charges from memory. Andrew then accused Candace of secretly receiving the answer through a text message—only for moderator PBD to verify that she received NO messages. No text. No assistance. All from memory. Andrew got completely outclassed in this exchange. This is the clip that will haunt him for a LONG time. 👇
- Aug 12, 20263.7x their median
Just reminding everyone that Andrew Wilson quite literally offered to debate me (or Baron Coleman) on OUR respective platforms for 300k. I literally accepted the public offer that he made. He also demanded that we negotiate the exact terms of that debate publicly here on X (which took a day and a half) so that none of us could edit the agreed upon terms thereafter. Now Andrew is posting hostage videos, complaining that when Joe Rogan offered to host us thereafter, I would not agree to let him suddenly edit the painfully and publicly negotiated terms which he insisted upon. He’s upset I accepted HIS initial offer followed HIS initial demands and wouldn’t suddenly pivot and agree to fly down to Texas to instead allow Joe Rogan to host the debate. Is this the first time anyone in Andrew Wilson’s life required him to be a man of his word? Because he seems genuinely hurt and confused by it.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 11K interactions against 7.8M followers, an engagement rate of 0.147%. Measured over 76 original posts, its engagement rate beats 89% of 3,739 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 908K times each, and 1.26% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 76 posts sampled, 46% carry an image or video and 14% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 94K interactions, about 8.2x its own typical post.
- What is Candace Owens's engagement rate on X?
- Candace Owens (@RealCandaceO) has an engagement rate of 0.147%, based on the median interactions across 76 original posts from the last 30 days against 7,811,824 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.147%, Candace Owens sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,378 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @RealCandaceO have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 89% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,739 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @RealCandaceO post?
- Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 5.87 posts per day across the measured window.