Back to @RealMattCouch's profile

Matt Couch engagement report

@RealMattCouch - 914K followers on X

Measured over 47 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.073%
of 914K followers
Per impression
3.08%
22K views on a typical post
Reach
2.38%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
668
interactions (median)
Saved
0.06%
13 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.13/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
23:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 668 interactions against 914K followers, an engagement rate of 0.073%. Measured over 47 original posts, its engagement rate beats 68% of 3,809 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 22K times each, and 3.08% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.38% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 47 posts sampled, 85% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 21K interactions, about 32x its own typical post.

Measured over 47 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Matt Couch's engagement rate beats 68% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,809 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 81% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.073%, Matt Couch sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,960 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.435%
p902.10%
p99159.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,960 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,518 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.435%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile159.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 23:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%73K
11:00 UTC-3%79K
12:00 UTC-2%87K
13:00 UTC-2%96K
14:00 UTC-4%99K
15:00 UTC-2%102K
16:00 UTC-3%99K
17:00 UTC-2%92K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-2%80K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%67K
22:00 UTC-2%58K
23:00 UTC-1%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%233K
Monday0%292K
Tuesday-3%284K
Wednesday-1%253K
Thursday-2%246K
Friday-3%255K
Saturday+3%229K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 14, 202632x their median

    If you can't define what a woman is, you're retarded.

    20K89019736228K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202625x their median

    Correct.. https://t.co/QuVdYe3xvo

    16K55013826227K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202621x their median

    It's been one year since Iryna Zarutska was murdered. She came to America to escape a war, but couldn't survive the soft-on-crime policies in a left-wing city. Never let them forget. https://t.co/6L3d0IDYjl

    12K2.4K27060146K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 202615x their median

    Call it a hunch... https://t.co/Lh3Qb1Xek4

    8.1K1.7K2264039K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 202612x their median

    Gay retard of the day 🥇 https://t.co/ov7hTeCNmP

    7.3K3071601793K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202611x their median

    Mark Cuban lost his mind long ago. https://t.co/MUYmnSKNEx

    7.1K2652032482K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20269.2x their median

    Welcome to Chicago 🤦🏻‍♀️ https://t.co/jQ5xHD8wto

    3.8K8891.3K139259K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20268.7x their median

    🎯 https://t.co/76lSwKXWq7

    4.5K1.2K674238K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20268.3x their median

    Nobody wants to see you washing your feet in the airport. Keep it moving.

    5.0K2522581048K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20267.3x their median

    awww.... memories... https://t.co/UWpldg3J65

    4.1K760451942K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 668 interactions against 914K followers, an engagement rate of 0.073%. Measured over 47 original posts, its engagement rate beats 68% of 3,809 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 22K times each, and 3.08% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.38% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 47 posts sampled, 85% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 21K interactions, about 32x its own typical post.

What is Matt Couch's engagement rate on X?
Matt Couch (@RealMattCouch) has an engagement rate of 0.073%, based on the median interactions across 47 original posts from the last 30 days against 913,593 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.073%, Matt Couch sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,960 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @RealMattCouch have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 68% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,809 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @RealMattCouch post?
Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going