Back to @Restrictfootage's profile

Restricted footage engagement report

@Restrictfootage - 501K followers on X

Measured over 37 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.063%
of 501K followers
Per impression
0.913%
34K views on a typical post
Reach
6.84%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
313
interactions (median)
Saved
0.175%
60 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.57/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
10:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 313 interactions against 501K followers, an engagement rate of 0.063%. Measured over 37 original posts, its engagement rate beats 60% of 3,862 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 34K times each, and 0.913% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.85% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 37 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 36x its own typical post.

Measured over 37 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Restricted footage's engagement rate beats 60% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,862 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 48% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.063%, Restricted footage sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.081%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99158.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,582 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 105,409 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile158.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%52K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%62K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%74K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%89K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-4%101K
15:00 UTC-2%104K
16:00 UTC-3%102K
17:00 UTC-3%94K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%68K
22:00 UTC-2%59K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%237K
Monday0%300K
Tuesday-3%299K
Wednesday-1%256K
Thursday-1%249K
Friday-3%258K
Saturday+3%232K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 24, 202636x their median

    Se busca obrero de la construcciΓ³n, estΓ© no creΓ³ que vuelva maΓ±ana πŸ™ƒπŸ€” https://t.co/zd29Meevx0

    11K386131162.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 202625x their median

    Terrifying footage as sudden flash flood sweeps through the Nepal Tibet region, forcing people to run for life safety. 😨 https://t.co/yyASeQTpdj

    6.8K94711666953K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202623x their median

    I'm really surprised that people don't know what this girl does. https://t.co/UPAcl3eyeE

    6.7K218228186.9M viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 202622x their median

    She's like a modern day Gidget!! I can’t even get out of my beach chair that gracefully. I’ve never considered surfing as an elegant sport until now, she’s ethereal & graceful. ❣️πŸ’₯πŸ„β€β™€οΈ https://t.co/NoHbtKcKxV

    6.1K62815554725K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 202613x their median

    JAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJJAA https://t.co/3HgpEv67PC

    3.6K4851214120K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202612x their median

    https://t.co/mI3ZtcZpYd

    3.7K22611.9M viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20262.6x their median

    seriously 😦 πŸ˜³πŸ˜±πŸ’€ https://t.co/D7LnEURivi

    753403554K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20262.1x their median

    What bad luck, hahahaha πŸ˜¬πŸ˜‚ https://t.co/s3hd6XDnbQ

    641154152K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20262.0x their median

    Attention: the bathroom is now free for men πŸ˜‚ https://t.co/CtYXFuYjC6

    6271030138K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20262.0x their median

    Necklace magic ✨ https://t.co/LuUbBrD3A4

    61794051K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 313 interactions against 501K followers, an engagement rate of 0.063%. Measured over 37 original posts, its engagement rate beats 60% of 3,862 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 34K times each, and 0.913% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.85% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 37 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 36x its own typical post.

What is Restricted footage's engagement rate on X?
Restricted footage (@Restrictfootage) has an engagement rate of 0.063%, based on the median interactions across 37 original posts from the last 30 days against 500,762 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.063%, Restricted footage sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Restrictfootage have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 60% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,862 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Restrictfootage post?
Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.57 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going