Back to @Rewkang's profile

Andrew Kang engagement report

@Rewkang - 423K followers on X

Measured over 4 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.067%
of 423K followers
Per impression
0.35%
81K views on a typical post
Reach
19.2%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
284
interactions (median)
Saved
0.095%
77 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.9/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Tuesday

Early reading. We have captured 4 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 284 interactions against 423K followers, an engagement rate of 0.067%. Posts are seen about 81K times each, and 0.35% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 19.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.9 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 4 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 75% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.3K interactions, about 4.7x its own typical post. Only 4 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 4 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.067%, Andrew Kang sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.433%
p902.10%
p99160.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,654 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,977 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.433%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-3%98K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-1%57K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%231K
Monday0%288K
Tuesday-2%278K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%245K
Friday-3%253K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 27, 20264.7x their median

    After so many demos, models, pilots, robots are still struggling to land real deployments with real customers. Until now. Today we’re excited to share that our robots have successfully crossed the ROI threshold, and Din Tai Fung, one of the highest revenue per location restaurant chain in the US, is rolling out Dyna robots across its extensive restaurant network. This brings our rollouts across hotels, logistics, data centers, and many other use cases to a fleet that reaches hundreds of robots by the first half of 2027. And we’re just getting started. It’s been a wild year, and today we’re double clicking on the battlefield stories and sharing a few learnings about scaling robot deployments. We are just scratching the surface. Read the full blog post: https://t.co/8QVEoQuzBY

    1.1K1375198298K viewsView on X
  • Jul 15, 20263.9x their median

    Announcing @REK - Become a REAL Robot Pilot with our humanoid fighting sim. Top 2 players this weekend qualify for REK2: The first 6 foot tall Humanoid fight in the West on August 15 (Fighting T800s!) Thank You to 8VC and RoboStrategy for co-leading our seed round last year! https://t.co/3LxXDBwuCu

    8331228972517K viewsView on X
  • Jul 27, 20262.0x their median

    https://t.co/XzLSqiKGYY

    431545437258K viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 20262.0x their median

    There’s a 400k welder labor shortage in the US alone and the average welder is 55 years old @PathRobotics is training robot dogs and other general purpose robots to weld https://t.co/W8dP4Du5Mr

    4862240782K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 2026

    The notion that all hardware is a commodity business is going to be flipped on its head this decade Unitree's IPO filings show that it has ~60% gross margins, higher than most AI labs Durable, high quality robots are going to be supply constrained. Developer and skill ecosystems will create moats around certain robot platforms. Companies that can create an amazing product will command brand premiums The force of capitalism is expanding beyond bits https://t.co/IuABRqQXtZ

    2552326569K viewsView on X
  • Jul 30, 2026

    Bringing private robotics exposure to the public markets https://t.co/XGYHNtdJeO

    2252029139K viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 2026

    RoboStrategy Portfolio - July 20, 2026 https://t.co/1yxuPhv5BC

    213162611106K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 2026

    RoboStrategy published our first Shareholder Letter, and in it we discuss our outlook on Robotics industry. While we've already reached the GPT-3 era, there won't be a ChatGPT moment. The adoption curve will be somewhere between AI chatbots and autonomous vehicles. There will be no single day where it clicks for the global consciousness, but nonetheless a rapid permeation of new autonomous machines of all shapes and sizes. Physical AI is already getting really good for a variety of use cases, but we can't instantly supply millions of robots to customers like we can with AI instances. By next year, intelligence will no longer be the bottleneck, it will be the actual robots. https://t.co/ZqzJwj81nc

    2181525031K viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 2026

    In 2009 we had a too big to fail tailwind for established companies In this era of government, we have a too important to not succeed mandate for smaller companies Golden era for venture capital and entrepreneurs in critical industries

    1971118036K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 2026

    Path has signed a $600M+ agreement with @wearehii (part of the $900M HII HYPR project). When I started Path eight years ago, I believed AI and robotics could give the world abundant skilled labor, helping people build the things that matter. Stronger infrastructure. A revitalized industrial base. The ships, factories, and critical systems our country depends on. Today is a major step toward that vision. In this agreement we'll deliver not only welding, but also dexterous assembly, enabling raw components to be turning into finished products. Unlocking throughput that was previously impossible, and unthinkable, without physical AI. Path was never just a welding company. The goal was always physical AI for all manufacturing and excited to take that next step at scale. Time to keep building.

    11013161293K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 284 interactions against 423K followers, an engagement rate of 0.067%. Posts are seen about 81K times each, and 0.35% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 19.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.9 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 4 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 75% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.3K interactions, about 4.7x its own typical post. Only 4 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Andrew Kang's engagement rate on X?
Andrew Kang (@Rewkang) has an engagement rate of 0.067%, based on the median interactions across 4 original posts from the last 30 days against 422,573 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.067%, Andrew Kang sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Rewkang have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @Rewkang post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.9 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going