Back to @RicBucher's profile

Ric Bucher engagement report

@RicBucher - 596K followers on X

Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.002%
of 596K followers
Per impression
0.061%
19K views on a typical post
Reach
3.17%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
12
interactions (median)
Saved
0.005%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.4/day
active 73% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 12 interactions against 596K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 15% of 3,829 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 19K times each, and 0.061% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.17% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 46% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 58% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.5K interactions, about 129x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #nba, #findingtheseams, #basketball.

Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026. Recurring tags: #nba, #findingtheseams, #basketball.

Compared with accounts its own size

Ric Bucher's engagement rate beats 15% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,829 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 4% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.002%, Ric Bucher sits above the 10th percentile of the 37,071 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.435%
p902.10%
p99158.3%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,071 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 105,527 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.435%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile158.3%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%71K
10:00 UTC-2%73K
11:00 UTC-3%80K
12:00 UTC-2%88K
13:00 UTC-2%96K
14:00 UTC-4%99K
15:00 UTC-2%103K
16:00 UTC-3%100K
17:00 UTC-2%92K
18:00 UTC-1%86K
19:00 UTC-2%81K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%67K
22:00 UTC-1%58K
23:00 UTC-1%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%234K
Monday0%294K
Tuesday-3%288K
Wednesday-1%253K
Thursday-2%247K
Friday-3%256K
Saturday+3%230K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 18, 2026129x their median

    The narrative of transgender athletes 'descending' upon women's sports is inflated. In the NCAA, only 10 out of over 550,000 athletes identify as transgender. Misogyny poses a far greater threat than a few individuals defining their gender identity. #WNBA #TransAthletes #Sports https://t.co/iLRNYWdLpI

    7181056824098K viewsView on X
  • Jul 14, 202644x their median

    Brunson bet $113M on himself, defying Knicks history. The NBA system forces great players to take less than they're worth to improve team wins. His decision paid off, and his ambition will be remembered by fans everywhere. #NBADefies #PlayerPower https://t.co/5rVvn9oTx9

    469539147K viewsView on X
  • Jul 22, 202621x their median

    Rich Paul presenting LeBron's best team fits on a podcast signals a shift in leverage. It's not about lack of interest, but adjusting to a new reality. Fans cling to a mythologized version of LeBron, lashing out when reality hits. #LeBronJames #NBA https://t.co/C0jKeiqUBw

    1652556540K viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 202620x their median

    Jonathan Kuminga has the physical tools to be a superior defender and a more dynamic offensive player than Lou Dort. Yet, he was let go, and Dort was acquired. That should be a wake-up call for JK. #NBADraft #PlayerDevelopment https://t.co/849EHFIPJB

    1972417450K viewsView on X
  • Apr 24, 202620x their median

    New episodes drop every week - Tune in now🎙️ https://t.co/ShUn4cuuzK

    2620310023K viewsView on X
  • Jul 30, 20268.8x their median

    Embiid's playoff defense was surprisingly poor, with a high blow-by rate and lack of rim protection. Pairing him with LeBron raises concerns about defensive consistency and hustle, especially with multiple high-usage players demanding the ball. #NBA #BasketballAnalysis https://t.co/yC9gJmMoNE

    541135625K viewsView on X
  • Jul 13, 20265.1x their median

    Sports are losing their soul to AI and replays. We chase perfect accuracy, forgetting the human element captivates us. Overanalyzing incidents with slow-mo and snapshots isn't justice; it's the opposite. #WorldCup https://t.co/XMD85pRm5u

    4777021K viewsView on X
  • Aug 2, 20263.7x their median

    Experimenting with free throw rules in the game disrespects its core principles. Instead of tinkering with fundamentals, let's cap instant replay reviews at 60 seconds. The integrity of the game should be the priority. #Basketball #GameChangers https://t.co/Cci2CepqAH

    3275019K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 20263.2x their median

    For most NBA players, winning isn't the priority. Maximizing earnings is. This isn't a flaw—it's a reflection of how many equate money with happiness. A choice many would make, even if they wouldn't advertise it. #NBADiscussion #PlayerPriorities https://t.co/dCm9jRoSfh

    2366319K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20262.3x their median

    The NBA's opening night matchups reveal who the league wants to promote. Interestingly, stars like Anthony Edwards, Kevin Durant, and Luka Dončić aren't featured, sparking questions about emerging talent. #NBA #Basketball https://t.co/NvBjmOMuO2

    1575018K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#nba#findingtheseams#basketball#ontheball#sixers

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 12 interactions against 596K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 15% of 3,829 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 19K times each, and 0.061% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.17% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 46% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 58% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.5K interactions, about 129x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #nba, #findingtheseams, #basketball.

What is Ric Bucher's engagement rate on X?
Ric Bucher (@RicBucher) has an engagement rate of 0.002%, based on the median interactions across 24 original posts from the last 30 days against 595,768 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.002%, Ric Bucher sits above the 10th percentile of the 37,071 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @RicBucher have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 15% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,829 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @RicBucher post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going