RaFi engagement report
@RoanRafi - 158K followers on X
Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 27, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 5 interactions against 158K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 10% of 21,624 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.8K times each, and 0.271% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.16% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 82% carry an image or video, 43% are part of a thread and 21% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.8K interactions, about 959x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #base, #jump, #airdrop.
Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 27, 2026. Recurring tags: #base, #jump, #airdrop.
Compared with accounts its own size
RaFi's engagement rate beats 10% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,624 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 14% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.003%, RaFi sits below the 10th percentile of the 218,393 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.149% |
| 75th percentile | 0.705% |
| 90th percentile | 2.63% |
| 99th percentile | 82.5% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 82% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 21% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 82% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 21% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 754 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 17, 2026959x their median
đš BREAKING: Marco Rubio has officially announced that anyone who dares to criticize Israel will be denied a US visa. By the way, this doesn't apply if you criticize the US itself. https://t.co/kMcQiSlJ2C
- Sep 21, 2026678x their median
big week
- Oct 2, 2026171x their median
thanks for making the jump see you at TGE đ«Ą
- Sep 16, 2026125x their median
India Sends 47 Lakh Litres Of Diesel To Bangladesh via Friendship Pipeline @MickyGupta84 reports https://t.co/I4grXBORu3 https://t.co/pB04XzzYCG
- Oct 26, 2026100x their median
https://t.co/7GO3lKIy4o
- Sep 17, 202617x their median
Traders didnât sell $ARC because the tech failed. They sold because the livestream showed a face they didnât expect. In crypto, that face instantly triggers an old fear: âIndian team = rug incoming.â Itâs not analysis. Itâs pattern recognition from 100 previous rugs. The fear isnât just losing money. Itâs being the last one holding the bag while everyone else already ran. One viral âI sold everythingâ tweet + thin liquidity + confirmation bias = instant dump. Doesnât mean the project is dead. It means the market still prices ethnicity faster than it prices fundamentals. #Base #Jump #Arc
- Oct 9, 202613x their median
How many wallets actually get the $JUMP airdrop? Jumper has about 2.81 million wallets with XP. The average is ~88. That number is not the recipient list. Community pulls of the leaderboard look like this: - 100+ XP: ~493,000 wallets - 200+ XP: ~273,000 - 500+ XP: ~86,000 - ~1,000 XP: ~29,000 - ~1,500 XP: ~13,000 - ~2,000 XP: ~6,000 The top wallet sits around 7,900 XP. Most of the board is dust. The formula is not published. What is published is how Jumper already filtered. On the #Legion sale, more than 55% of the allocation went to the community by Jumper Pass level. Arjun Chand said they used above level 20 as the filter for an allocation and above level 30 for higher priority, so enough users would get a sufficient size. Even after that cut, almost 1,000 people above level 20 bid 2-3x the target. He also said top Jumper users will always be rewarded, and that you cannot farm XP into a higher level in a month. Level 20 was a sale rule, not an airdrop cutoff. The logic still matters. Teams do not split a community bucket across everyone who touched the app. $Monad is the reference. It had ~311 million testnet addresses. The community tranche that received the heavy allocation was 5,935 accounts. Raw onchain count was not the list. If Jumper applies the same filter, eligibility is not 2.8 million wallets. It is the top of the pass: something like 35,000, 13,000, or 5,000. A few thousand would not be a surprise. It would be the cut they already used when they had to make an allocation worth holding. #JUMP #BASE #ZRO #AIRDROP
- Oct 8, 202611x their median
Jumper Loyalty Pass levels may matter more than raw XP for the $JUMP airdrop. A 24 Sep 2026 snapshot maps pass levels directly to minimum XP and qualified wallets: Level 10 requires 500 XP and covers 86,131 wallets. Level 12 requires 900 XP and covers 35,163 wallets. Level 15 requires 1,500 XP and covers 13,177 wallets. Level 20 requires 2,500 XP and covers only 3,058 wallets. During the recent Legion sale, the team already used Loyalty Pass levels as the main filter for community allocations, with a reported cutoff around level 20+ and higher priority for level 30+. That precedent makes a level-based airdrop threshold more likely than a pure XP cutoff. If the airdrop targets Level 10 to Level 15, the eligible set lands between roughly 13K and 86K wallets. That is far tighter than LayerZeroâs $ZRO distribution, which reached over 1.2 million wallets with 8.5% of supply. XP already embeds volume, transaction count, and chain activity through the old badge system. A Loyalty Pass floor would simply turn that history into a clearer tier. Volume and multi-chain usage would still separate rewards inside the same level, but the gate itself would be the pass rank. Final rules are not public yet. The open question is whether Jumper repeats the sale logic and concentrates the airdrop on higher Loyalty Pass tiers, or opens a wider window closer to Level 10. @jumperapp @arjunnchand curious how the team is weighing Loyalty Pass level versus raw XP for the community allocation. #JUMP #BASE #AIRDROP
- Sep 15, 202610x their median
The Senate just killed the CLARITY Act on a 50-50 cloture vote. It needed 60. Years of lobbying, hundreds of millions spent, and the biggest U.S. crypto market-structure bill of this cycle is now stalled. Hereâs what actually changes, and what doesnât. 1. No permanent rulebook. The bill would have written CFTC vs SEC jurisdiction into law and given digital commodities a statutory home. That doesnât happen. The industry stays under agency guidance that a future administration can rewrite with a memo. Durability just died. 2. The calendar slammed shut. The House already cancelled late-September weeks. The Senate heads into midterm campaign mode. The realistic next window is the next Congress, not this one. 2026 passage is effectively over. 3. Institutions stay in the gray zone. Banks, asset managers, and tokenizers keep building, but they keep navigating a fragmented, enforcement-heavy market. Stablecoin yield fights and bank-lobby resistance donât vanish just because the vote failed. Capital still moves slower than it would have with a statute. 4. Markets already knew. Prediction markets had priced failure. Thatâs why the dump wasnât a crash. It was the last bit of hope getting squeezed out. BTC slipped toward the mid-$70Ks. The obvious short was already crowded. 5. Regulators, not Congress, now run the show. SEC and CFTC keep writing rules. Agency action becomes the only live path for token classification, custody, and DeFi guidance. Faster than legislation, and far easier to reverse. Bottom line: crypto doesnât stop. It just stays American-legal on borrowed time. The industry wanted a law. It got another reminder that politics still outranks market structure. #Base #Jump
- Oct 20, 20269.6x their median
I feel ashamed seeing some Bangladeshi accounts playing the victim card after two Bangladeshis got the death penalty in Saudi Arabia for committing a sexual crime inside a mosque. Who are these people really? The propaganda going around on Bangladeshi social media makes me think Awami League supporters and Indian extremist Hindus are behind it. These people hate Islam intensely. They are using this incident to attack Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Islam itself. The sad part is many Muslims are emotionally joining them too. But they are downplaying such a serious crime. Even after adultery inside a holy mosque some Muslims are showing sympathy for them. It is truly shameful. https://t.co/XnH0l60SMD
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 5 interactions against 158K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 10% of 21,624 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.8K times each, and 0.271% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.16% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 82% carry an image or video, 43% are part of a thread and 21% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.8K interactions, about 959x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #base, #jump, #airdrop.
- What is RaFi's engagement rate on X?
- RaFi (@RoanRafi) has an engagement rate of 0.003%, based on the median interactions across 28 original posts from the last 30 days against 158,250 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.003%, RaFi sits below the 10th percentile of the 218,393 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @RoanRafi have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 10% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,624 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @RoanRafi post?
- Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.33 posts per day across the measured window.