R E P L I C A N T engagement report
@Roybattyforever - 267K followers on X
Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 29, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 311 interactions against 267K followers, an engagement rate of 0.116%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 62% of 21,624 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 2.26% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.14% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 65K interactions, about 210x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #urda, #clayface, #fiestadelcine.
Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 29, 2026. Recurring tags: #urda, #clayface, #fiestadelcine.
Compared with accounts its own size
R E P L I C A N T's engagement rate beats 62% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,624 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 66% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.116%, R E P L I C A N T sits above the 25th percentile of the 218,281 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.149%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.149% |
| 75th percentile | 0.705% |
| 90th percentile | 2.63% |
| 99th percentile | 82.5% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 90% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 13% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 90% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 13% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 688 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 4, 2026210x their median
'Spider-Noir' has been canceled by Prime Video after one season https://t.co/aq4FfubMwH
- Oct 24, 202657x their median
En Mayo de 1996, Jim Carrey presentó "Saturday Night Live" y entró con un sketch que hizo historia. Dos hermanos con un único talento en la discoteca: mover la cabeza como posesos al ritmo de "What Is Love", de Haddaway. Will Ferrell a un lado, Chris Kattan al otro y Carrey en medio, con cara de intento de ligón de discoteca poseído. Las chicas huyeron despavoridas, pero aquel gag con cabezazos sincronizados dio lugar a una película, "Una noche en el Roxbury" (1998), y sigue estando en el imaginario colectivo como uno de los sketches más endiabladamente divertidos de SNL. https://t.co/lUlqyJB0YL
- Nov 17, 202456x their median
Mi opinión sobre #GladiatorII (sin spoilers) Es imposible competir contra una leyenda, así que deberíamos ser cuidadosos a la hora de valorar la secuela de una de las más grandes películas de todos los tiempos. "Gladiator II", por si misma, es un mastodóntico blockbuster que👇 https://t.co/thkoqQJ41U
- Sep 22, 202637x their median
Resident Evil (2026) Fan movie poster art. Had a blast drawing this one up. Enjoy 🤘🏻 #ResidentEvil #ResidentEvilㅤ #movieposter https://t.co/tZpJ1R6syP
- Oct 22, 202631x their median
Who’s the WORST person to watch a film with? #filmtwt https://t.co/Ry9ZkGwere
- Sep 13, 202617x their median
The visuals of “Akira” remain unmatched. https://t.co/Aen4aVlZPC
- Sep 5, 202514x their median
Michael Keaton cumple años. Este versátil actor ha demostrado que puede romper los esquemas físicos y prejuicios con sus enormes actuaciones. Aquí os presento curiosidades sobre su vida y carrera. Os sorprenderá. Va hilo👇👇👇 https://t.co/Pt9Jvf3x2L
- Oct 24, 20267.1x their median
Paramount quería hacer “Forrest Gump” con un presupuesto que se quedaba muy corto. Para sacarla adelante, Tom Hanks y Robert Zemeckis aceptaron cambiar sus honorarios fijos por un porcentaje de la taquilla. Hanks se jugó el sueldo a una película sobre un señor de bajo cociente intelectual y pocas garantías de éxito. Incluso pagó junto al director parte de las escenas de la carrera por Estados Unidos, que el estudio se negaba a financiar. La apuesta le salió muy bien: 678 millones recaudados en todo el mundo y unos 40 millones para Hanks, aunque otras fuentes hablan de 70 millones. Tonto es el que hace tonterías.
- Oct 23, 20264.9x their median
Danny DeVito produjo Pulp Fiction. Su productora, Jersey Films, fichó a Tarantino en 1991 tras una charla de seis minutos, cuando “Reservoir Dogs” aún no se había estrenado. DeVito tenía en TriStar un acuerdo que le daba el montaje final de sus proyectos y se lo cedió a Tarantino con un apretón de manos, sin firmar nada. Él mismo ha contado que veinte personas abandonaron la sala durante uno de los primeros pases, pero aún así, nadie tocó un fotograma. También fue él quien plantó cara a Harvey Weinstein, que quería a Daniel Day-Lewis como Vincent Vega😳. Tarantino quiso a Travolta y el resto es historia.
- Aug 31, 20264.9x their median
Vasquez. Talks like the rent is due and she is the landlord. Goldstein does not play tough. She plays done. The smartgun is punctuation. Hudson does the screaming. She does the scoring. Let’s rock. End of brief. https://t.co/4Fake5ez5o
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 311 interactions against 267K followers, an engagement rate of 0.116%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 62% of 21,624 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 2.26% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.14% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 65K interactions, about 210x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #urda, #clayface, #fiestadelcine.
- What is R E P L I C A N T's engagement rate on X?
- R E P L I C A N T (@Roybattyforever) has an engagement rate of 0.116%, based on the median interactions across 31 original posts from the last 30 days against 267,126 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.116%, R E P L I C A N T sits above the 25th percentile of the 218,281 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @Roybattyforever have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 62% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,624 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @Roybattyforever post?
- Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.8 posts per day across the measured window.