Back to @Rumoreconomy's profile

财经真相 engagement report

@Rumoreconomy - 936K followers on X

Measured over 88 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.021%
of 936K followers
Per impression
0.453%
44K views on a typical post
Reach
4.74%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
201
interactions (median)
Saved
0.039%
18 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.97/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
03:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 201 interactions against 936K followers, an engagement rate of 0.021%. Measured over 88 original posts, its engagement rate beats 46% of 3,739 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 44K times each, and 0.453% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.74% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 88 posts sampled, 40% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.8K interactions, about 14x its own typical post.

Measured over 88 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

财经真相's engagement rate beats 46% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,739 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 30% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.021%, 财经真相 sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,378 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.432%
p902.10%
p99161.0%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,378 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,364 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.432%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile161.0%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 03:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%69K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%100K
16:00 UTC-3%97K
17:00 UTC-2%90K
18:00 UTC-1%84K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%230K
Monday0%286K
Tuesday-2%276K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%244K
Friday-3%252K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 27, 202614x their median

    华为法务部的威胁 https://t.co/F2lmUtVTLd

    2.1K22440822318K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20269.0x their median

    十五年后,随着财政崩溃,中国庞大的基建设施由于得不到维护,会逐渐破烂化 上海某些偏远的地铁站里,会陆续出现屎尿味,机场高铁垃圾堆,地铁发车间隔十分钟以上,而且票价极贵 随着失业率失控,三四线偏远地铁会出现大批流浪汉,单身女性再也不敢独身去这些地方,犯罪率越来严重,警察维护难以为继

    1.2K7648713260K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20267.0x their median

    央行发布了老江的一元硬币,这算是给足了面子 https://t.co/oUmJAp3xpj

    1.0K353127577K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20266.4x their median

    中国女生为何对老外这么主动热情? 很多人说是媚外,其实大错特错! 小仙女找老外本质就是借外国没有天价彩礼,放纵自己的性欲,跟老外玩完拍屁股回国,家人朋友都不知道,然后再找国男接盘 对外开放放纵压抑的性欲,对内保守要责任要担当 自己有性需求,却不能对国男承认,否则就没法要彩礼了

    864723508142K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20265.9x their median

    王水牛睡的几百女生,大概率最后还是由上海的男生来接盘,而且还是要车房和彩礼! 有人说这事是你请我愿,跟别人无关 假如美国人统治上海,然后对上海女行使初夜权,你会怎么想? 你可以给这件事各种辩解,但从结果来看是不是都是国男接盘? 唯一区别后者你尚且知道恨,前者你连抱怨都不行

    746394027133K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20264.3x their median

    国内大厂的中高层,据说被全行业招聘封杀,原因是“国企味太浓! 嘴上太假大空,实际干活能力几乎为零,而且薪资要天价,被坑的企业太多了 以前去大厂是镀金,现在是抹屎!

    579272591129K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20263.6x their median

    许家印给老家五亿捐建的家印高中,改回了太康县第一中学,后来觉得太不好,就用横幅遮盖住了 https://t.co/uZx7eVhYXu

    466272294511K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20263.3x their median

    老许被判无期徒刑,按照剧本再关个三五年,他就可以顺利的“病死了” 他欠的债也就此烟消云散,一场瓜分盛宴结束了! 普通人只是被告知自己的钱被许家印拿走了,他真的可以拿走两万亿吗? https://t.co/asgI13WR5j

    509461068176K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20263.3x their median

    冷知识,乌克兰打仗五年,军费行动(含援助)近3300亿美元 而一个恒大2.4万人民币,约合三千亿美元 一个恒大够乌克兰打五年

    50926127084K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20263.2x their median

    中国现在灵活就业人数3.2 亿,去年时还是2.8亿,再继续拖下去明年可能会达到接近4亿,而且这些人之间竞争也是愈演愈烈,收入会越来越少,这些人生活困境也会更加恶劣,这局改怎么破??

    46918154498K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 201 interactions against 936K followers, an engagement rate of 0.021%. Measured over 88 original posts, its engagement rate beats 46% of 3,739 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 44K times each, and 0.453% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.74% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 88 posts sampled, 40% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.8K interactions, about 14x its own typical post.

What is 财经真相's engagement rate on X?
财经真相 (@Rumoreconomy) has an engagement rate of 0.021%, based on the median interactions across 88 original posts from the last 30 days against 936,162 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.021%, 财经真相 sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,378 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Rumoreconomy have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 46% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,739 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Rumoreconomy post?
Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.97 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going