Rupert Lowe MP engagement report
@RupertLowe10 - 890K followers on X
Measured over 51 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 29, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 14K interactions against 890K followers, an engagement rate of 1.55%. Measured over 51 original posts, its engagement rate beats 99% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 167K times each, and 8.23% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 18.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 51 posts sampled, 33% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 98K interactions, about 7.1x its own typical post.
Measured over 51 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 29, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Rupert Lowe MP's engagement rate beats 99% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 98% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 1.55%, Rupert Lowe MP sits above the 75th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.434% to 2.10%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.08% |
| 75th percentile | 0.434% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 160.7% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 50K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 51K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 50K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 53K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 43K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 42K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 48K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 52K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 60K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 69K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 72K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 78K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 86K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 94K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 97K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 97K |
| 17:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 84K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 79K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 74K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 66K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 57K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 51K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +4% | 230K |
| Monday | 0% | 286K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 276K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 251K |
| Thursday | -1% | 244K |
| Friday | -3% | 252K |
| Saturday | +3% | 227K |
Best tweets
- Aug 20, 20267.1x their median
Portugal's burqa ban has been enacted today. Good news. Britain should do the same.
- Aug 25, 20263.9x their median
An app designed for reporting 'islamophobia' is now campaigning for me to be banned from Parliament. We are reaching ever increasing heights of delusion, fear and nuttiness.
- Aug 25, 20263.8x their median
Banning cousin marriage is the right thing to do.
- Aug 21, 20263.5x their median
Our Restore Britain investigation has uncovered that the British taxpayer is funding condoms and lubricant for illegal migrants detained in immigration removal centres. This is not a joke. A Restore Britain Government will end the piss-take.
- Aug 20, 20263.0x their median
I do not want third world scumbags who have broken into our country allowed to freely roam our communities. If that makes me some far-right bigot, then I'm proud to wear that label.
- Aug 24, 20262.8x their median
The Guardian is attacking me over receiving money from X. Trust me, if I wanted to make money, I would NOT be in politics. I donate my entire net MP salary to charity. This is the most expensive job I’ve ever had, comfortably!
- Aug 17, 20262.8x their median
With the British people's approval, a Restore Britain Government will put the Eritrean man who raped a pensioner outside a church to death.
- Aug 19, 20262.6x their median
Our prisons are overflowing and nobody in Government has seriously thought to deport the 10,134 foreign criminals in our prisons. They are either remarkably thick or ill-intentioned, to put it mildly.
- Aug 18, 20262.2x their median
As usual, there is an immense amount of fake information circulating around Restore Britain’s immigration policy. I will spell it out. Read this, and let me know if you think it’s ‘nazism’, 'far-right' or whatever else… Where would we start? Illegal migrants. The entire illegal population will be removed. Man, woman and child. I don’t have to justify why. Restore Britain has published the most comprehensive deportation policy ever released in Britain. They will all be removed. No excuses. We’ve detailed exactly how we will do that. That is step one, along with the foreign criminals in our prisons. Don’t need to explain further. Step two? Legal migrants who can’t speak English, refuse to work, claim benefits, live in social housing, hate our way of life or even actively want to do us harm? They go too - hopefully voluntarily. If not, they will be removed. Dual national Islamists who want us dead? Strip them off their British citizenship and send them back to Pakistan or wherever else. That will mean millions and millions of people will leave the country over the first parliament of a Restore Britain Government. All done with drastic reductions of the number of people settling in the country, and I mean drastic. An almost entire border closure - immigration inwards will be in the thousands, not hundreds of thousands. Far more people will leave than arrive. The population will fall, drastically. Ultra-high skilled migrants are welcome to fill the gaps until we can train our own. That, and foreign spouses of Brits from countries not on the ‘Red List’. That process will be simplified and made more affordable so that British men and women can build a life with their loved ones in our country. That is positive immigration. If their presence benefits the British people, that is acceptable. This is not complicated. What is our ‘Red List’? If a country is proven to supply us with sex pests, rapists, criminals and illegals? We will shut off immigration. Entirely. That's step three, all implemented concurrently. Pakistan, Afghanistan, Eritrea, Sudan, Somalia to name a handful… The asylum system will be abolished. Entirely. No more asylum seekers. Benefits for foreign nationals would be cancelled. Social housing currently filled with foreigners would be emptied for British families. This is all just common sense. I have been very clear that I am uncomfortable with the rapidly changing demographics of our country following the impact of mass immigration - particularly the growing Islamic influence which continues to transform our communities. Restore Britain will reverse the islamification of our country. I make no apologies for that. The process of obtaining British citizenship will change beyond recognition. We will not simply encourage foreign nationals to obtain a citizenship in order to access benefits. Those numbers will be drastically reduced in the most extraordinary way. Will any of this be particularly straightforward? No. But we are publishing detailed policy laying out exactly how we will achieve this - our 'Red List' document is very much on the way... This is the very top level. If you want to know more, please examine our 100+ page deportation policy document. With plenty more detail to come. The media will abuse and harass me. So be it. I want to do one thing and one thing only. Put the British people first. There is finally a political party that is dedicated to doing exactly that. Restore Britain.
- Aug 26, 20262.2x their median
Mass deportation is now fully in the political mainstream, and that is Restore Britain's greatest achievement to date.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 14K interactions against 890K followers, an engagement rate of 1.55%. Measured over 51 original posts, its engagement rate beats 99% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 167K times each, and 8.23% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 18.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 51 posts sampled, 33% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 98K interactions, about 7.1x its own typical post.
- What is Rupert Lowe MP's engagement rate on X?
- Rupert Lowe MP (@RupertLowe10) has an engagement rate of 1.55%, based on the median interactions across 51 original posts from the last 30 days against 890,436 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 1.55%, Rupert Lowe MP sits above the 75th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @RupertLowe10 have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 99% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @RupertLowe10 post?
- Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.83 posts per day across the measured window.