Sassafrass84 engagement report
@Sassafrass_84 - 641K followers on X
Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 1.9K interactions against 641K followers, an engagement rate of 0.296%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 86% of 3,848 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 15.2% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.94% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 39% carry an image or video and 9% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 19K interactions, about 10x its own typical post.
Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Sassafrass84's engagement rate beats 86% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,848 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 100% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.296%, Sassafrass84 sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,320 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.081% to 0.436%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.081% |
| 75th percentile | 0.436% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 160.1% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 52K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 53K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 51K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 55K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 44K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 43K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 49K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 53K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 62K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 71K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 74K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 80K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 88K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 97K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 100K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 103K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 100K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 93K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 87K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 82K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 76K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 67K |
| 22:00 UTC | -1% | 58K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 52K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 235K |
| Monday | 0% | 296K |
| Tuesday | -3% | 292K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 254K |
| Thursday | -2% | 248K |
| Friday | -3% | 256K |
| Saturday | +3% | 230K |
Best tweets
- Aug 25, 202610x their median
Strangulation takes up to 5 to 10 minutes until death! Lindsay Clancy did this 3 times to each child, even chasing her little son! She's guilty and criminally responsible for premeditated murder! End of story! https://t.co/WroeTmMN7E
- Aug 25, 20263.0x their median
Sorry, ladies, this is going to be unpopular with some of you, but it needs to be said. The “same Lindsay” types are exactly why women should not be handed positions of real power. One emotional meltdown and it’s bombs away. Especially with liberal American women. Their judgment is consistently broken. Wrong on almost every major issue. No moral compass. Can you imagine if Kamala had actually won? Where would this country be right now? If you can’t regulate your own emotions (whether as a mother or just as an adult) you have no business holding authority over anyone. None. I used to want to see a woman become president. I don’t anymore.
- Aug 25, 20262.4x their median
President Trump decided the fly the flags at half mast for 1 week in honor of Dolly Parton. Instead of appreciating the beautiful gesture that our president is doing for our beloved Dolly, the radical left is still being ugly about it. Things said like it should have been you. Wrong 80 year old. There is nothing this man can do that will ever change their minds or at least have compassion and human decency towards him or anything he does. People are truly deranged. Sick. And we have to share a country with these miserable people. What are they going to do when President Trump leaves office? 🤦♀️
- Aug 25, 20262.2x their median
Just another psa: I also refuse to follow people who sympathize with Lindsay Clancy. She murdered her children. And then the internet dehumanized her babies. There is no excuse in the world that you can give me that would justify what she did to those children. Somebody has to defend the innocent children. And push back against all these disgusting women who support Lindsay. I stand for justice with Cora, Dawson, and Callan.
- Aug 25, 20261.7x their median
Jelly Roll should have taken some tips from Dolly Parton and stayed out of the political arena. Doesn’t he know that everything woke turns to 💩? It’s your career bro.
- Aug 25, 20261.6x their median
The face of nightmares. Her eyes are dead. Her soul is gone. This is the face of a demon. Hurts my heart to know those kids suffered at the hands of this monster. The person they trusted the most. The mother who was supposed to protect them. Lindsay chose to end their lives. This woman deserves to rot in prison.
- Aug 25, 2026
Damn it. Another one gone. I loved Dolly Parton. Rest in peace Dolly. Picture by people magazine. https://t.co/0kHsB68qe2
- Aug 25, 2026
History repeats itself. It’s important that America takes precautions and maintains our borders and immigration policies. https://t.co/nMjXMIom7I
- Aug 25, 2026
A mother murders her three children… and people start making excuses. This video nails the real issue: You spent years calling babies in the womb “clumps of cells.” Now act surprised when that same mindset starts applying to kids who are already born. You can’t spend decades treating the most vulnerable humans as disposable and then pretend to be shocked when some people stop seeing them as fully human. We knew this would happen. We knew it. Video credit: leelorising on tik tok.
- Aug 25, 2026
So let me get this straight. Hormones are “dangerous” for pregnant women and new moms, but perfectly safe when injected into healthy kids to permanently alter their bodies? Make that make sense.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 1.9K interactions against 641K followers, an engagement rate of 0.296%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 86% of 3,848 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 15.2% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.94% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 39% carry an image or video and 9% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 19K interactions, about 10x its own typical post.
- What is Sassafrass84's engagement rate on X?
- Sassafrass84 (@Sassafrass_84) has an engagement rate of 0.296%, based on the median interactions across 23 original posts from the last 30 days against 640,547 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.296%, Sassafrass84 sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,320 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @Sassafrass_84 have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 86% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,848 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @Sassafrass_84 post?
- Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.1 posts per day across the measured window.