Back to @Sooothai's profile

Ty engagement report

@Sooothai - 394K followers on X

Measured over 21 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.078%
of 394K followers
Per impression
2.31%
13K views on a typical post
Reach
3.39%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
308
interactions (median)
Saved
0.083%
11 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.23/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
04:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 308 interactions against 394K followers, an engagement rate of 0.078%. Measured over 21 original posts, its engagement rate beats 49% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 2.31% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.39% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 21 posts sampled, 62% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 71K interactions, about 232x its own typical post.

Measured over 21 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Ty's engagement rate beats 49% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 67% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.078%, Ty sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.434%
p902.10%
p99160.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,521 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,166 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.434%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 04:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 04:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 04:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%69K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%100K
16:00 UTC-3%97K
17:00 UTC-2%90K
18:00 UTC-1%84K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%230K
Monday0%286K
Tuesday-2%276K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%244K
Friday-3%252K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 26, 2026232x their median

    Manifesting a night like this in Paris with the loml someday 🥹 https://t.co/ixtYUwGmYc

    60K11K2647572.9M viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 2026137x their median

    🩷 https://t.co/tupDPbSYXE

    36K5.9K96197589K viewsView on X
  • Mar 14, 2026134x their median

    Happy 27th Birthday to the talented Olivia Dean. https://t.co/y6XOb4QSIR

    37K3.2K2135862.2M viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 202631x their median

    NEW: Parents begging for abortion of 'Baby Gabiel' regain custody of the child after the surrogate fled to Texas to have the baby. Nausheen Gilkar, 43, and Omar Ahmed, 45, were trying to have their surrogate, McKenna West, 28, abort the baby after the baby was diagnosed with hypoplastic left heart syndrome. The syndrome causes the left half of the heart to be smaller and unable to pump blood to the rest of the body. West refused to have the baby aborted and fled to Texas after finding a hospital with a high success rate with babies born with that condition. The baby was born, and an immediate life-saving surgery was performed on the baby West named ‘Gabriel.’ ‘Baby Gabriel’ is now in the custody of the parents who so desperately wanted to abort him.

    7.4K9066956126.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 202631x their median

    Hermès is coming to Williamsburg, Brooklyn!🔥 https://t.co/uyiYvCBdYf

    8.8K448912531.7M viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202628x their median

    Sometimes I wonder why life introduces us to people we were never meant to end up with.

    6.9K1.4K120205131K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 202624x their median

    Blueface really wasn't playing about cheating just days after Neveah gave birth 😭 He told her he was going to retrieve his watch from the other girl... and that he'd probably sleep with her. And the new girl had some things to say to his other women: 'Just keep everyone in position, they think they're bigger than the program, but everybody has a role to play.' 👀 This whole thing is getting messier by the day."

    6.1K1765923623.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202614x their median

    I’ll never understand why some Mexicans are so racist toward Black people but are friendly af with white people. This Mexican lady told her daughter to tell my son they couldn’t play because he’s Black...

    4.0K265374956K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20264.1x their median

    Halloween loading ...... https://t.co/4TdanpOlwV

    1.2K1074818K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20263.7x their median

    https://t.co/CsN2Hj2RHG

    1.1K285013K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 308 interactions against 394K followers, an engagement rate of 0.078%. Measured over 21 original posts, its engagement rate beats 49% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 2.31% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.39% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 21 posts sampled, 62% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 71K interactions, about 232x its own typical post.

What is Ty's engagement rate on X?
Ty (@Sooothai) has an engagement rate of 0.078%, based on the median interactions across 21 original posts from the last 30 days against 393,929 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.078%, Ty sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Sooothai have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 49% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Sooothai post?
Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.23 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going