Back to @SpenLC's profile

Spen engagement report

@SpenLC - 185K followers on X

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.146%
of 185K followers
Per impression
2.21%
12K views on a typical post
Reach
6.59%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
270
interactions (median)
Saved
0.025%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.9/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
11:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 270 interactions against 185K followers, an engagement rate of 0.146%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 66% of 21,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 2.21% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.59% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.9 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 59% carry an image or video, 12% are part of a thread and 47% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.6K interactions, about 9.6x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #brawlstars, #bsc26, #cosmobox.

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026. Recurring tags: #brawlstars, #bsc26, #cosmobox.

Compared with accounts its own size

Spen's engagement rate beats 66% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 65% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.146%, Spen sits above the 25th percentile of the 219,576 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.026% to 0.149%.

p100.004%
p250.026%
p50 (median)0.149%
p750.706%
p902.63%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 219,576 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 21,696 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.026%
50th percentile0.149%
75th percentile0.706%
90th percentile2.63%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video59% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link47% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 59% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 47% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 116 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 6, 20259.6x their median

    Mr & Mrs Hendley 💍 The best day of my life ❤️ https://t.co/fgtgsplYMP

    2.4K721620263K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20267.2x their median

    Not the way I wanted the year to end but I’m gonna work harder for 2027. https://t.co/aO4oDPARUs

    1.6K17016036337K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20265.2x their median

    I hate Wendy, I hate Shade, I hate Amber, I hate Gus, I hate Primo, I Hate Nori

    1.3K7751130K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20264.9x their median

    Last ever monthly final as a pro tomo im nervous and excited at the same time. I hope it goes well and can retire happily but whatever is meant to be will be. Thank you everyone for supporting me over the years

    1.2K4768479K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20264.4x their median

    I can’t do this anymore I’m breaking. It has been 2 hours without you Brawl Stars, and I genuinely don’t know how much longer I can survive. My doctor warned me this would happen but I was in denial. Time is running out, there’s not much time left before I go INSANE. What am I supposed to do without my love. My purpose. My oxygen. Without it I can’t breathe. Every second without you a piece of me dies. I want to load into a ranked game, get my teammate to pick Edgar or Tick, lose -100 elo and then Que again. Brawl Stars is my heartbeat and without it I cannot live. So please Supercell if you’re reading, END THIS MAINTENANCE. END THIS SUFFERING. Only Brawl Stars can save me.

    1.1K8922041K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20263.0x their median

    Tier List After Challengers, A few underrated takes in their like chuck, starr nova. But this meta is completely dominated by the top 15 brawlers in the game it makes most other brawlers really irrelevant Watch my vid here: https://t.co/7FKJbOjM4c https://t.co/8KR8xj6uEl

    72229381647K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20262.9x their median

    Cosmo Prestige 2, hard to get consistent damage so his super charge can be frustrating but once you get super you delete everything xD Low S Tier/High A nowhere near as broken as Wendy or Damian on release thankfully 🙏 https://t.co/LH7G6Kw03j

    7611714322K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20262.9x their median

    For all the people asking I won’t be able to attend Worlds this time, that’s now 2 years without worlds after attending all worlds prior 😭 Japan is too expensive sadly 😅

    760523031K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20262.9x their median

    Soon! What do you mean soon. Soon I’m gonna beat your ass Brawl Stars if you don’t open up the servers! https://t.co/HTZqFxnRI2

    7371916124K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 20262.8x their median

    HI it’s Spen from the future the winners are so so EASY CR FUT LOUD TRIBE 4/4

    681205412103K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#brawlstars#bsc26#cosmobox#na#newspray

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 270 interactions against 185K followers, an engagement rate of 0.146%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 66% of 21,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 2.21% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.59% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.9 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 59% carry an image or video, 12% are part of a thread and 47% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.6K interactions, about 9.6x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #brawlstars, #bsc26, #cosmobox.

What is Spen's engagement rate on X?
Spen (@SpenLC) has an engagement rate of 0.146%, based on the median interactions across 17 original posts from the last 30 days against 185,082 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.146%, Spen sits above the 25th percentile of the 219,576 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @SpenLC have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 66% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @SpenLC post?
Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.9 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going