Back to @StartupGrind's profile

Startup Grind engagement report

@StartupGrind - 498K followers on X

Measured over 4 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.004%
of 498K followers
Per impression
0.276%
7.1K views on a typical post
Reach
1.42%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
20
interactions (median)
Saved
0.043%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.4/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
22:00 UTC
Wednesday

Early reading. We have captured 4 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 20 interactions against 498K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Posts are seen about 7.1K times each, and 0.276% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.42% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 4 posts sampled, 25% carry an image or video and 50% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.5K interactions, about 225x its own typical post. Only 4 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 4 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.004%, Startup Grind sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.433%
p902.10%
p99160.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,654 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,977 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.433%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 22:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-3%98K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-1%57K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%231K
Monday0%288K
Tuesday-2%278K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%245K
Friday-3%253K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jun 29, 2026225x their median

    James Dumoulin (@tvmjames) has built an audience by asking one simple question: What financial lessons did you learn the hard way? The cofounder and face of The School of Hard Knockz reaches millions with content promoting financial literacy, alongside brand partners including Burger King, Microsoft Copilot and Celsius. Explore the full #ForbesTopCreators 2026 list: https://t.co/CzD26jfPM1 ๐Ÿ“ธ: Amanda Edwards via Getty Images

    4.0K38511345175K viewsView on X
  • Jun 17, 202668x their median

    Weโ€™ve raised a $310M Series B to accelerate world models! We believe AI that can understand and simulate the world will be one of the most important technologies of our time. We're excited to partner with Natural Capital, Amazon, GV, AMD, IQT, and others to bring this to life. https://t.co/788Mt2Tyxs

    99217413849486K viewsView on X
  • May 18, 202611x their median

    This is Startup Grind, baby. ๐Ÿ˜œ If you were there, you know. And if you werenโ€™t, make sure to join us next year as we make the Startup Grind Conference anniversary the biggest one yet, together. Early interest list is open now. Link in reply. https://t.co/XBrv41xDwb

    26184807.6K viewsView on X
  • Jul 16, 2026

    Fireworks AI (@FireworksAI_HQ) just closed a $1.5B Series D at a $17.5B valuation. 40 trillion tokens a day, 95%+ specialized models running in production. @lqiao was on our Startup Grind Conference stage this year, incredible to watch what's come since. Huge one ๐Ÿ‘

    194002.3K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 2026

    We've watched too many founders build something great and then wonder why nobody showed up. It's not the product. It never was. The hardest problem in startups is still the same one ๐Ÿงต

    1821011K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 2026

    Everyone's obsessed with the AI stack right now. Infrastructure, agents, models, who's building on what. Useful. But it quietly skips the part that actually decides which startups make it and which ones don't. Three layers nobody maps ๐Ÿงต

    122607.6K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 2026

    For 15 years, this stage has held some of the people who shaped what tech looks like today. Sam Altman. Eric Schmidt. Fei-Fei Li. Jan Koum. And thousands of founders nobody knew yet, the ones still figuring it out, still pitching, still building. That mix has always been the point. The names you know and the names you're about to, in the same room, working on the same hard problems. Next year, the Startup Grind Conference turns 15. Our biggest edition yet. Same core it's always had: AI, startups, and the capital that moves them forward, now at the center of the whole AI economy. 15 years in. The best one is still ahead. ๐ŸŒŸ

    114313.7K viewsView on X
  • Jul 14, 2026

    Everyone's building with AI right now. Very few founders can answer one question: which layer are you building on? Infrastructure: models, compute. The giants own it, that fight's over. โ€จAgents: tools on top. Great demos, brutal to defend. โ€จCompanies: your data, your distribution, an edge no model update can erase. We've spent 15 years around founders, and the pattern doesn't change: the people who win aren't the ones with the best tech. They're the ones who turn it into a company. Which layer are you on? ๐Ÿ‘‡

    103502.3K viewsView on X
  • Apr 30, 2026

    Every chapter has a heartbeat. And behind it, a person who shows up. Month after month, city after city, opening the door so no founder ever has to walk this path alone. With over 600 chapters around the world, Startup Grind is only as strong as the people leading them. This year's Directors of the Year. ๐ŸŒŸ Alexandra Poelstra, Carlos Zarate, David Stengle, Rajiv Nathan, Corey Hart, Daniel Gomez, Michael Thaney, James Gee, Sid Khaitan, Reuben Levinsohn, Emma Loedel and Jason Kraus. Thank you for everything you give to this community. ๐Ÿซถ

    141201.0K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 2026

    . @tvmjames brought The School of Hard Knocks to the Startup Grind Conference and did what only he does: cold-approached billionaires in the hallways. @amasad. @justinkan. @aplusk. All in one video ๐Ÿงต

    92116.5K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 20 interactions against 498K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Posts are seen about 7.1K times each, and 0.276% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.42% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 4 posts sampled, 25% carry an image or video and 50% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.5K interactions, about 225x its own typical post. Only 4 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Startup Grind's engagement rate on X?
Startup Grind (@StartupGrind) has an engagement rate of 0.004%, based on the median interactions across 4 original posts from the last 30 days against 498,240 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.004%, Startup Grind sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @StartupGrind have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @StartupGrind post?
Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going