Back to @Tendar's profile

(((Tendar))) engagement report

@Tendar - 453K followers on X

Measured over 34 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.608%
of 453K followers
Per impression
5.68%
49K views on a typical post
Reach
10.7%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.8K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.094%
46 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.2/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 2.8K interactions against 453K followers, an engagement rate of 0.608%. Measured over 34 original posts, its engagement rate beats 93% of 21,624 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 49K times each, and 5.68% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 34 posts sampled, 94% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 25K interactions, about 9.2x its own typical post.

Measured over 34 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

(((Tendar)))'s engagement rate beats 93% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,624 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 91% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.608%, (((Tendar))) sits above the 50th percentile of the 218,281 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.149% to 0.705%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.149%
p750.705%
p902.63%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 218,281 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 21,721 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.149%
75th percentile0.705%
90th percentile2.63%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video94% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 94% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 310 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 25, 20269.2x their median

    Imagine being a CEO of an US energy company and thinking that you work with close associates of the Trump family, only to find out that behind them is a sanctioned Russian company, really pulling the strings. This happened in Alaska. Polar Train LNG's CEO, Joel Riddle, stepped down after finding out that the Russian "Novatek" company, which is under US sanctions, has been involved in a $25 billion energy project in Alaska. The CEO thought that he was working with Gentry Beach, a close friend of Donald Trump Junior. Reportedly, that project was also discussed between Witkoff and Jared Kushner when they were with Putin. The White House admitted that the project was talked about "briefly". We are witnessing the greatest corruption scandal the USA has ever witnessed. It all leads to Trump, his family and the Russians, and apparently they were even ready to sell riches of Alaska to the Russians. The people in Alaska just need to look over to Russia, where the richest regions in terms of minerals and hydrocarbon resources have been stripped-mined, transferring all the wealth to Moscow and Saint Petersburg and leaving a scarred landscape in extreme poverty. That is the result of rampant corruption. We are starting to see more details why Trump and his friends are trying so strongly to bully Ukraine into surrender. This is most certainly only the tip of the iceberg.

    17K7.1K338419256K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20267.7x their median

    We’re in orbit! And just made European history: This is the first time a privately developed rocket reached orbit from continental Europe; and a testament to the dedication, expertise, and teamwork of everyone involved.

    18K2.1K6504312.1M viewsView on X
  • Mar 10, 20265.6x their median

    Three professional drone teams from Ukraine have arrived in the Middle East in order to support efforts to neutralize Iranian drones. The first 3 countries being supported are Saudi Arabia, Qatar and United Arab Emirates. This has been confirmed by President Zelenskyy. https://t.co/MEAI76sarr

    12K2.4K325278916K viewsView on X
  • Oct 23, 20265.2x their median

    Poland’s Foreign Ministry Sikorski not only reminds Elon Musk that the USA haven’t been paying a cent to Ukraine in almost two years and in fact even benefited from the arms sales, but also schooled him that he is only damaging his brands when meddling in foreign countries. https://t.co/f6v57eMKV7

    12K2.4K9239130K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20263.2x their median

    The amount of Patriot interceptor missiles the US are using to counter Iranian attacks is mind-boggling. Between 60 and 100 missiles, possibly even more, fired in a matter of minutes, the majority being PAC-3 MSE interceptors. It is obvious that Iran is deliberately exhausting US stockpiles using rather cheap missiles. The political backlash in the US is already huge, and any further uncoordinated escalation is primarily hurting the US and the West altogether. The Iranian regime has also nothing seriously to fear from the Trump administration, because of the wasted time in the beginning of the year. Only a full-scale invasion would change their calculus, but of course, there is virtually a zero chance that this is going to happen. Hence, they are feeling emboldened. The White House is even not capable to grasp or admit that Tehran is clearly coordinating with Russia. The coordination is certainly going beyond providing target coordinates of US troops. Not to mention the surging oil price which helps them both. The only good news is that Ukraine is depleting Russia, and by extension Iran. But Washington is clearly squandering that momentum. Without any serious grand strategy by the US administration, which would also consider the inclusion of allies and partners, this whole war is a blunder of epic proportions. It is only the latest example how important a clear strategy, solid alliances and trust are.

    6.8K1.6K278127300K viewsView on X
  • Oct 24, 20263.1x their median

    The “Ozon“ warehouse in Omsk, Russia, is now completely on fire. This was a direct hit. https://t.co/qJWFFQqh0w

    7.6K931892767K viewsView on X
  • Oct 18, 20263.0x their median

    President Zelenskyy stated that the US refused to share intel regarding ballistic missile strikes for three days. Like I said, it has zero to do with oil prices.

    7.2K97533979K viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 20262.9x their median

    The Wildberries logistics hub in Ryazan, Russia, is basically gone. There is nothing to salvage here. https://t.co/HJPQKH1uIy

    6.8K6839336165K viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 20262.7x their median

    Turkish forces deployed five F-16 fighter jets to Estonia, supporting the Baltic flank of NATO. https://t.co/SlbYdiB1Oa

    6.9K6017524252K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20262.7x their median

    Less than 24h after the terrorist attack in Brandenburg, another electrical substation has been attacked, this time in Bergheim, NRW, Germany. The police suspects sabotage. https://t.co/M2MjyggGb0

    5.9K1.4K10085242K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.8K interactions against 453K followers, an engagement rate of 0.608%. Measured over 34 original posts, its engagement rate beats 93% of 21,624 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 49K times each, and 5.68% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 34 posts sampled, 94% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 25K interactions, about 9.2x its own typical post.

What is (((Tendar)))'s engagement rate on X?
(((Tendar))) (@Tendar) has an engagement rate of 0.608%, based on the median interactions across 34 original posts from the last 30 days against 452,935 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.608%, (((Tendar))) sits above the 50th percentile of the 218,281 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Tendar have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 93% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,624 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Tendar post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going