Back to @TheChrisWoodard's profile

Chris engagement report

@TheChrisWoodard - 376K followers on X

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.84%
of 376K followers
Per impression
0.98%
322K views on a typical post
Reach
85.7%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
3.2K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.06%
194 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1/day
active 47% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 3.2K interactions against 376K followers, an engagement rate of 0.84%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 86% of 3,775 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 322K times each, and 0.98% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 85.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 45% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 138K interactions, about 44x its own typical post.

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Chris's engagement rate beats 86% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,775 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 42% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.84%, Chris sits above the 75th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.433% to 2.10%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.433%
p902.10%
p99160.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,654 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,977 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.433%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-3%98K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-1%57K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%231K
Monday0%288K
Tuesday-2%278K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%245K
Friday-3%253K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • May 29, 202644x their median

    how do i shoplift online omg plz

    129K9.2K2593403.7M viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 202626x their median

    ‘GROWN UPS 3’ has begun filming. Coming soon to Netflix. https://t.co/EI2bPjJIBH

    76K4.4K1.1K1.2K2.9M viewsView on X
  • Jul 9, 202625x their median

    A Chinese restaurant in the Bay Area is fining parents for their out-of-control kids. The owner of Chez Xue says he has had enough of poorly behaved children in his restaurant, so he is now fining parents. You You Xue says one customer changed a dirty diaper next to another customer who was dining. "We are not a playground. Please ensure children REMAIN SEATED at all times and respectful of fellow guests and the dining environment," the restaurant's policy says. "Running around, shouting, making noise with utensils, etc. WILL NOT BE TOLERATED!" One parent was charged $327 after their child smashed a credit card machine. Another parent was charged $109 after their kid carved designs into a table with a utensil. One more parent was charged $5 after a child smashed a teacup. "I honestly put this notice on my menu because I didn't want to put my employees in the position of parenting other people's children. It should not be their job," the owner said. This guy is awesome.

    67K8.5K1.4K6993.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 20268.8x their median

    JUST IN: Anthropic CEO reportedly increasingly concerned that new hires are working there for a paycheck, as opposed to the company’s mission.

    22K9682.3K2.6K11M viewsView on X
  • Jul 14, 20268.6x their median

    “I don't even know how this is legal.” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is questioning how lawmakers can disappear from Congress for months without public explanation after Sen. Mitch McConnell revealed previously undisclosed health issues that kept him away from the Capitol. AOC says medical emergencies happen, but argues extended absences without transparency have “crossed” a line. @foxnewspolitics

    22K1.3K3.3K3979.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20267.7x their median

    BANKER: “Your account is overdrawn by $47.” CUSTOMER: “I know. My paycheck comes in tomorrow.” BANKER: “You’ll also be charged a $35 overdraft fee.” CUSTOMER: “Wait… I’m being charged $35 because I’m short $47?” BANKER: “That’s the policy.” CUSTOMER: “So I’m already struggling, and the solution is to take another $35 from me?” BANKER: “I don’t make the rules.” CUSTOMER: “But you work here.” The banker sighed. BANKER: “Look, I understand. But I can’t remove the fee.” The customer looked at the screen. Then smiled. CUSTOMER: “Okay. Close my account.” The banker paused. BANKER: “You want to close it over $35?”

    22K1.7K532536.0M viewsView on X
  • Jul 26, 20267.7x their median

    JUST IN: Georgia police supervisor arrested for allegedly using Flock cameras to track her boyfriend’s vehicle more than 30 times

    21K2.3K3694531.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 20267.2x their median

    A man opened up about seeing his high school friend ashamed and hiding his face while working the McDonald’s drive-thru 🍟🧑🏾‍🍳 “We come from being homeless, it doesn’t matter where you work at” https://t.co/p97twNziZi

    21K1.7K23878415K viewsView on X
  • Apr 26, 20266.5x their median

    U.S. government is accepting donations to pay off its $39 trillion debt via PayPal and Venmo.

    14K1.3K2.0K2.8K4.8M viewsView on X
  • May 10, 20266.2x their median

    I agree with this! If you can’t afford a tip, stay home https://t.co/JQh1T5ZdVR

    2.7K23816K9541.0M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 3.2K interactions against 376K followers, an engagement rate of 0.84%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 86% of 3,775 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 322K times each, and 0.98% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 85.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 45% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 138K interactions, about 44x its own typical post.

What is Chris's engagement rate on X?
Chris (@TheChrisWoodard) has an engagement rate of 0.84%, based on the median interactions across 11 original posts from the last 30 days against 376,070 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.84%, Chris sits above the 75th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @TheChrisWoodard have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 86% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,775 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @TheChrisWoodard post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going