Back to @TheFootballFeed's profile

The Football Feed engagement report

@TheFootballFeed - 376K followers on X

Measured over 50 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.059%
of 376K followers
Per impression
0.246%
91K views on a typical post
Reach
24.1%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
224
interactions (median)
Saved
0.013%
12 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.9/day
active 83% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 224 interactions against 376K followers, an engagement rate of 0.059%. Measured over 50 original posts, its engagement rate beats 44% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 91K times each, and 0.246% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 24.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 50 posts sampled, 94% carry an image or video and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15K interactions, about 69x its own typical post.

Measured over 50 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

The Football Feed's engagement rate beats 44% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 14% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.059%, The Football Feed sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,459 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.081%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.438%
p902.10%
p99159.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,459 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,523 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.438%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile159.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%52K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%62K
09:00 UTC-3%71K
10:00 UTC-2%74K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%89K
13:00 UTC-2%97K
14:00 UTC-3%100K
15:00 UTC-2%104K
16:00 UTC-4%101K
17:00 UTC-3%94K
18:00 UTC-1%87K
19:00 UTC-2%82K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%68K
22:00 UTC-1%59K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%236K
Monday0%298K
Tuesday-3%295K
Wednesday-1%255K
Thursday-1%249K
Friday-3%257K
Saturday+3%231K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 21, 202669x their median

    Defeat at the Emirates. ⏹️ https://t.co/SJUpMg0Gc1

    13K6571.3K426991K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 202647x their median

    Nottingham Forest have completed the signing of 22 year old Ousmane Diomande... https://t.co/WhOqe7aQ3K

    9.2K3537423352.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 202644x their median

    Unbelievable from Arsenal 👏🏻 https://t.co/7rQLtipu1b

    9.4K218105371.8M viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 202641x their median

    He's not wrong... https://t.co/djm3bGjRtV

    9.0K18563223K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202625x their median

    "Arsenal are just such an awful team to watch aren't they" https://t.co/P7GxCBdNWI

    4.9K35231456135K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202624x their median

    DOM BALLARD that is INSANE, goal of the season is already in boys and girls 🤯🔒 https://t.co/rpHu9uPMKD

    4.9K37143119780K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 202619x their median

    Nah Van Dijk that is GRIM 😭 I think VAR should be getting involved and punishing van Dijk for this 🤧 https://t.co/g3prtu9hl1

    3.7K2151851945.5M viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 202610x their median

    LATE DRAMA! 😱 Raul Jimenez cooly converts from the penalty spot, deep into added time to save a point for Wolves 🔥 https://t.co/5h2lMxcHNU

    2.1K6068682.6M viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20267.4x their median

    Perfect analogy 😂 https://t.co/lruwweD3sa

    1.5K13123884K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20267.0x their median

    Hull fans were enjoying themselves after taking a 2-0 lead against Man United 🐯 We are SO back 😂 https://t.co/YOR0HUb66R

    1.4K841334163K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 224 interactions against 376K followers, an engagement rate of 0.059%. Measured over 50 original posts, its engagement rate beats 44% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 91K times each, and 0.246% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 24.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 50 posts sampled, 94% carry an image or video and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15K interactions, about 69x its own typical post.

What is The Football Feed's engagement rate on X?
The Football Feed (@TheFootballFeed) has an engagement rate of 0.059%, based on the median interactions across 50 original posts from the last 30 days against 376,402 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.059%, The Football Feed sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,459 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @TheFootballFeed have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 44% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @TheFootballFeed post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.9 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going