Back to @TheTrueVanguard's profile

True Vanguard engagement report

@TheTrueVanguard - 794K followers on X

Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.021%
of 794K followers
Per impression
0.649%
25K views on a typical post
Reach
3.20%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
165
interactions (median)
Saved
0.014%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.17/day
active 70% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 165 interactions against 794K followers, an engagement rate of 0.021%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 44% of 3,862 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 25K times each, and 0.649% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.20% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 64% carry an image or video and 14% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 43K interactions, about 258x its own typical post.

Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

True Vanguard's engagement rate beats 44% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,862 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 41% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.021%, True Vanguard sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,350 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.081%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.437%
p902.10%
p99159.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,350 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,576 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.437%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile159.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%52K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%62K
09:00 UTC-3%71K
10:00 UTC-2%74K
11:00 UTC-3%80K
12:00 UTC-2%88K
13:00 UTC-2%97K
14:00 UTC-4%100K
15:00 UTC-2%103K
16:00 UTC-3%100K
17:00 UTC-3%93K
18:00 UTC-2%87K
19:00 UTC-2%82K
20:00 UTC-1%76K
21:00 UTC-1%67K
22:00 UTC-1%58K
23:00 UTC-1%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%235K
Monday0%296K
Tuesday-3%292K
Wednesday-1%254K
Thursday-2%248K
Friday-3%256K
Saturday+3%230K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Dec 17, 2025258x their median

    Prove to me you’re an old gamer in one sentence. I’ll drop a like if I’m convinced.

    8.0K23933K1.0K6.2M viewsView on X
  • Jun 22, 2026171x their median

    Someone explains the concept to you for the third time, but you still don't understand. https://t.co/iRESeIDF2F

    25K3.0K3252901.4M viewsView on X
  • Jun 23, 202633x their median

    https://t.co/cb9oRLw5HB

    4.3K4404503352.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 202622x their median

    Bahaha she thought she could hide down there until her team respawned, but Black Cat can buy an item that grounds fliers. https://t.co/2RAQzBDHXh

    3.5K66299109K viewsView on X
  • Jul 16, 202618x their median

    Daily movement routines are becoming one of the hottest wellness trends in 2026 https://t.co/yFsyIRudZv

    2.8K250387461K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202618x their median

    Rewrite the rules with forbidden magic. Warlock's gameplay reveal is here. Wishlist today: https://t.co/GAI6uh5i9g https://t.co/ueM3JhQSKC

    2.3K444110207669K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 202613x their median

    To investigate your mysterious enemy, you and your twin J decide to infiltrate the enemy base. But things don’t exactly go according to plan. Watch a new trailer for The Expanse: Osiris Reborn — Undercover on Ganymede. https://t.co/SEqkiklERT

    1.7K2667659197K viewsView on X
  • Jun 18, 20267.3x their median

    It's a little disappointing to see so many formerly creative people descend into outrage impression farming and reaction content over the Destiny fallout. Remember what made people love your channel and your community to begin with. It's really easy to lose sight of that when the space is filled with voices on opposite hills screaming back and forth at each other. The Destiny community has ALWAYS been at its best when it's welcoming, charitable, and pushing the boundaries of what a community can accomplish in the creative content space. As Deej used to say in his posts and blogs, "be excellent to each other."

    1.0K6991442K viewsView on X
  • Jun 25, 20267.2x their median

    I gave my best years to the Destiny community. My late nights, charity streams, weekends, learning new editing skills just so I could improve the quality of my work. And on a day like today when all I do is post about how I'm praying that the devs losing their jobs will find a good place to land and can provide for their families, this is what I get in response. I have always wanted the best for Destiny, I've pushed for a Destiny 3 for years dating back several expansions. But I moved on, and this is what I get from the community that was once my home. The community that at one point was so supportive that they rallied behind my content and streams to grant more than 10 wishes for Make a Wish kids. Now I get wishes that I'll fail, wishes I'll be boycotted, get called a shill for a game I don't even cover. I still want the best for Destiny, for the devs, and for the franchise that I still care about deeply. But I also mourn the community that used to be a literal city on a hill in the gaming world. And days like today make me feel even more certain that I made the right decision. The Rivals community has been so incredibly supportive of me and my content. Thankfully these comments today are dwarfed in number by the heartfelt kind words I get from the Rivals folks who find value in my content. I know you folks are angry, and you have every right to be. But man do I sure wish you expressed it better than you are lately. These comments will forever, unfortunately, be my final impressions of what used to be one of the most positive influences on my life.

    1.0K31139661K viewsView on X
  • Jun 15, 20265.2x their median

    The only comment I’ll make is this. One cannot praise Jesus and then in their next breath insult a woman for literally no reason other than to stir up hate. American Christians have a responsibility to put Christ above politics and openly condemn things like this. Jesus went out of His way to visit the most hated woman among outcasts, a woman considered gross, a “half-breed Jew,” a sub human among other sub humans. And He spoke with kindness and patience, affirming her worth and offering her communion with God. What we’re seeing on screens and hearing on podcasts today from Christian influencers and celebrities who claim Christ is nothing short of using His name in vain. We have to be better.

    7735233437K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 165 interactions against 794K followers, an engagement rate of 0.021%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 44% of 3,862 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 25K times each, and 0.649% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.20% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 64% carry an image or video and 14% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 43K interactions, about 258x its own typical post.

What is True Vanguard's engagement rate on X?
True Vanguard (@TheTrueVanguard) has an engagement rate of 0.021%, based on the median interactions across 28 original posts from the last 30 days against 793,843 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.021%, True Vanguard sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,350 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @TheTrueVanguard have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 44% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,862 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @TheTrueVanguard post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.17 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going