Back to @Thomas1774Paine's profile

Thomas Paine engagement report

@Thomas1774Paine - 270K followers on X

Measured over 32 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 27, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.024%
of 270K followers
Per impression
1.64%
3.9K views on a typical post
Reach
1.45%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
64
interactions (median)
Saved
0.026%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.07/day
active 53% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 64 interactions against 270K followers, an engagement rate of 0.024%. Measured over 32 original posts, its engagement rate beats 35% of 21,624 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 3.9K times each, and 1.64% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.45% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 32 posts sampled, 41% carry an image or video and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 19K interactions, about 298x its own typical post.

Measured over 32 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 27, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Thomas Paine's engagement rate beats 35% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,624 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 56% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.024%, Thomas Paine sits above the 10th percentile of the 218,281 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.149%
p750.705%
p902.63%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 218,281 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 21,721 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.149%
75th percentile0.705%
90th percentile2.63%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video41% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link13% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 41% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 13% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 143 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 6, 2026298x their median

    THE MOST RIGGED ENDING EVER WHERE IS THE EXTRA SECOND? THE BALL IS STILL IN THE AIR. WESTERN MICHIGAN WON THAT GAME. https://t.co/JtIo61jcnx

    16K1.9K3933551.8M viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 2026241x their median

    Darth Vader comes out in favor of Flock cameras https://t.co/YL3jaiwIEx

    13K2.2K279353840K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 2026236x their median

    Stop saying we are in a cult! 😭😭😭😭😭 MAGAMorons https://t.co/gwEreDOlhO

    12K2.2K361287254K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 2026133x their median

    WESTERN MICHIGAN GOT ROBBED REFS PUT 1 SECOND ON THE CLOCK 😭 https://t.co/WwqZl1jD7h

    7.6K53421698342K viewsView on X
  • Oct 25, 202699x their median

    Young, fearless, and draped in red, white, and blue. Fire in her voice, and love for her country in every word. This is the kind of fire we all need in our belly. https://t.co/tOaSS0gH6q

    5.3K9816544129K viewsView on X
  • Oct 15, 202689x their median

    Trump: "I travel with doctors. If people get sick in the audience, they leave them alone. You know what they call them? Collateral damage. If that person right over there, he looks like shit actually. He looks like he's ready to have a heart attack. If he did, my doctors would leave him alone." What the actual fuck? #25thAmendment. NOW. https://t.co/0Tj8BRQuyt

    3.9K1.1K511204273K viewsView on X
  • Oct 12, 202688x their median

    If Annie Andrews can’t define what a woman is, she’s not qualified to be a pediatrician, let alone a United States Senator. https://t.co/FAds97jKRX

    4.0K8127204382K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 202669x their median

    The green dildo has returned to the WNBA. https://t.co/x4iqeGCMbs

    3.6K20653285434K viewsView on X
  • Oct 24, 202661x their median

    Trump: “My uncle invented radar....From MIT. Dr. John Trump....He'll probably be upset that I took out Iran's radar.” Who wants to tell him that radar was invented by Scottish physicist Robert Watson-Watt in 1935? How embarrassing. https://t.co/17mMZ41PA8

    2.9K7621925334K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202645x their median

    Howard Stern is looking good. I think it’s time for another Covid booster shot. https://t.co/SSMWzVoAYf

    2.5K17219317631K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 64 interactions against 270K followers, an engagement rate of 0.024%. Measured over 32 original posts, its engagement rate beats 35% of 21,624 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 3.9K times each, and 1.64% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.45% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 32 posts sampled, 41% carry an image or video and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 19K interactions, about 298x its own typical post.

What is Thomas Paine's engagement rate on X?
Thomas Paine (@Thomas1774Paine) has an engagement rate of 0.024%, based on the median interactions across 32 original posts from the last 30 days against 270,408 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.024%, Thomas Paine sits above the 10th percentile of the 218,281 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Thomas1774Paine have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 35% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,624 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Thomas1774Paine post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going