Back to @TrendSpider's profile

TrendSpider engagement report

@TrendSpider - 707K followers on X

Measured over 63 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.054%
of 707K followers
Per impression
0.507%
75K views on a typical post
Reach
10.6%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
382
interactions (median)
Saved
0.048%
36 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
5.13/day
active 80% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 382 interactions against 707K followers, an engagement rate of 0.054%. Measured over 63 original posts, its engagement rate beats 59% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 75K times each, and 0.507% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 63 posts sampled, 98% carry an image or video and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.1K interactions, about 8.0x its own typical post.

Measured over 63 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

TrendSpider's engagement rate beats 59% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 35% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.054%, TrendSpider sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.433%
p902.10%
p99160.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,654 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,977 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.433%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-3%98K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-1%57K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%231K
Monday0%288K
Tuesday-2%278K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%245K
Friday-3%253K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 13, 20268.0x their median

    🚨 CEO Buy Alert The CEO of Boston Scientific $BSX just dropped $9,000,000 on his own stock while shares are down nearly 50% YTD... 🌶️ https://t.co/RzOXnkAwKe

    2.7K2357833844K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20266.4x their median

    BREAKING: Nvidia $NVDA just disclosed updated stock positions. They own: -$30B worth in $INTC stock -$21B worth in $SPCX stock -$4.6B worth in $CRWV stock -$3B worth in $COHR stock -$2.2B worth in $NOK stock -$2.1B worth in $SNPS stock -$328M worth in $NBIS stock -$14M worth in $GENB stock

    2.0K2949336805K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20266.0x their median

    🚨 Stanley Druckenmiller is betting BIG on Amazon. He increased his $AMZN share position more than 10x this quarter, from 45,800 shares to 541,600. He also more than doubled his position in $AMZN calls to more than 4,500 contracts. https://t.co/NWR8j3YU0G

    2.1K1405132276K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20265.8x their median

    BREAKING: U.S. forces have begun conducting strikes on Larak Island in Iran. This marks the first U.S. military strikes against Iran in weeks. Futures open in less than 3 hours.

    1.9K1648063362K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20264.7x their median

    BREAKING: President Trump just announced “the biggest oil deal in world history” Venezuela will give the U.S. “majority control” of more than 65 BILLION barrels of oil. Yes, BILLION. This would account for more than 20% of Venezuela’s estimated total of 300 billion barrels in reserve. The transaction “more than doubles” U.S. oil reserves.

    1.5K12315431196K viewsView on X
  • Jun 9, 20264.3x their median

    Are we gonna look back and say this was a no-brainer? $PLTR https://t.co/VAOSiXL3xX

    1.5K95546428K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20264.1x their median

    BREAKING: The SEC has launched an investigation into the trading of Leopold Aschenbrenner's Situational Awareness fund, per NYT. The SEC sent subpoenas to multiple banks who gave Situational Awareness money to trade with, asking for details about the timing of trades and how Situational Awareness communicated with lenders.

    1.3K1089758462K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 20263.8x their median

    If you invested $10,000 in $TSLA stock 4 years ago, you'd be up $200 (+2%) right now. https://t.co/VUGIJx4arW

    1.2K7711935460K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20263.4x their median

    BREAKING: Michael Burry has shared updated positions. He says he opened a new short position on CoreWeave $CRWV and added to short positions on: -Micron $MU -Semi ETF $SOXX -Palantir $PLTR https://t.co/g0UC9Gn0Vz

    1.0K8117926949K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20263.0x their median

    No AI. No semis. No software. No tech. Just energy drinks. $1,000 invested before 2004 is worth over $1,000,000 today Now that's a monster. $MNST https://t.co/80hDBbjd7r

    1.0K573816228K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 382 interactions against 707K followers, an engagement rate of 0.054%. Measured over 63 original posts, its engagement rate beats 59% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 75K times each, and 0.507% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 63 posts sampled, 98% carry an image or video and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.1K interactions, about 8.0x its own typical post.

What is TrendSpider's engagement rate on X?
TrendSpider (@TrendSpider) has an engagement rate of 0.054%, based on the median interactions across 63 original posts from the last 30 days against 707,351 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.054%, TrendSpider sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @TrendSpider have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 59% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @TrendSpider post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 5.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going