Back to @USGS_Quakes's profile

USGS Earthquakes engagement report

@USGS_Quakes - 324K followers on X

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.091%
of 324K followers
Per impression
1.26%
23K views on a typical post
Reach
7.25%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
296
interactions (median)
Saved
0.03%
7 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.63/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
09:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 296 interactions against 324K followers, an engagement rate of 0.091%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 69% of 21,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 23K times each, and 1.26% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.25% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.63 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 6% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.4K interactions, about 8.2x its own typical post.

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

USGS Earthquakes's engagement rate beats 69% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 53% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.091%, USGS Earthquakes sits above the 25th percentile of the 218,920 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.149%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.149%
p750.706%
p902.63%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 218,920 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 21,716 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.149%
75th percentile0.706%
90th percentile2.63%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video6% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 6% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 163 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 10, 20268.2x their median

    This morning's magnitude 7.4 earthquake in Colombia caused strong shaking across western Columbia. An estimated 1.5 million people experienced shaking near intensity 7, strong enough to cause damage to unreinforced masonry buildings especially. The earthquake occurred at a depth of ~100 km, within the slab of old seafloor sinking beneath the South American continent. These so-called intermediate depth, interslab earthquakes are less dangerous than shallow earthquakes of the same magnitude because the fault break is farther from the earth's surface. But these faults also break in a way that releases energy at frequencies that are damaging to buildings. Intermediate depth earthquakes tend to have fewer aftershocks than more shallow quakes, but strong aftershocks are possible and pose a continuing hazard during rescue and recovery. For more information about this and other earthquakes, see https://t.co/treLGBJizy Map shows estimated distribution of shaking from the 10 August 2026 Colombia earthquake

    1.7K698343693K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 20266.2x their median

    Notable quake, preliminary info: M 8.0 - 14 km SW of Pitaloza Arriba, Panama https://t.co/qnQAspzMXy

    1.2K52831107141K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20266.0x their median

    The ShakeMap for yesterday's magnitude 7.4 earthquake in Colombia has been revised with the analysis of additional data, including eyewitness reports contributed to the USGS Did You Feel It? system. The earthquake did generate stronger shaking than average for the magnitude and location. The USGS estimates that over 6 million people were exposed to intensity 7 to 8 shaking. Towns east of the epicenter, including Pereira, Manizales, and Armenia experienced severe shaking. Our hearts are with the people of Colombia as rescue and recovery operations continue. For up-to-date information about this and other earthquakes, see https://t.co/QOeRZbmKoZ Figure: Updated ShakeMap for 10 August 2026 Colombia earthquake

    1.3K439221670K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20265.8x their median

    Notable quake, preliminary info: M 7.4 - 5 km E of San José del Palmar, Colombia https://t.co/wkV30OXjpo

    1.2K4792843146K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20265.0x their median

    Notable quake, preliminary info: M 7.7 - 68 km NNW of Ende, Indonesia https://t.co/tXVeUk65Sg

    9604353157147K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20263.1x their median

    Notable quake, preliminary info: M 6.7 - 38 km NW of Upahuacho, Peru https://t.co/1AUHBMgDBp

    618244221958K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20262.9x their median

    🌎Week in Earthquakes (August 14-21) 187 earthquakes of magnitude 4.5 or greater were recorded around the world this week. The largest was a destructive magnitude 7.7 earthquake off the north coast of southern Indonesia in the Flores Sea. That area experienced many aftershocks this week. Other notable earthquakes include a magnitude 6.9 in northern Indonesia and a magnitude 6.7 in southern Peru. For more information, please visit https://t.co/QOeRZbniex. 📷Map showing week's earthquakes with tectonic plate boundaries

    58124071645K viewsView on X
  • Jul 17, 20262.4x their median

    Notable quake, preliminary info: M 7.3 - 48 km SW of Aquiles Serdán, Mexico https://t.co/lb0uJuhZ2B

    462220171671K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20262.4x their median

    🌎Week in Earthquakes (August 28-September 4) 108 earthquakes of magnitude 4.5 or greater were recorded around the world this week. The largest was a magnitude 6.3 earthquake off the coast of the central Aleutian Islands, which has had several aftershocks so far. For more information, please visit https://t.co/QOeRZbniex 📸Image shows map of global earthquakes this past week.

    5341495836K viewsView on X
  • Jul 31, 20262.2x their median

    "A Tale of Two Earthquakes" Our hearts go out to those affected by the tragic M6.8 Uto earthquake, which struck southern Japan on July 28, 2026. The earthquake caused widespread damage and a death toll now standing at 35. With its on-land location and locally severe shaking, the earthquake reminds us that moderately large earthquakes, also including the 1994 M6.7 Northridge, California, earthquake, pose a significant hazard in earthquake-prone regions especially. If you feel strong shaking in any location, drop, cover, and hold on. For more information about recent quakes, see https://t.co/QOeRZbmKoZ [Maps show USGS ShakeMaps for 1994 Northridge and 2026 Uto earthquakes.]

    542917351K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 296 interactions against 324K followers, an engagement rate of 0.091%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 69% of 21,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 23K times each, and 1.26% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.25% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.63 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 6% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.4K interactions, about 8.2x its own typical post.

What is USGS Earthquakes's engagement rate on X?
USGS Earthquakes (@USGS_Quakes) has an engagement rate of 0.091%, based on the median interactions across 17 original posts from the last 30 days against 323,601 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.091%, USGS Earthquakes sits above the 25th percentile of the 218,920 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @USGS_Quakes have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 69% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @USGS_Quakes post?
Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.63 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going