Uldouz engagement report
@Uldouz - 421K followers on X
Measured over 4 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026.
Engagement
Early reading. We have captured 4 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.
A typical post picks up 44 interactions against 421K followers, an engagement rate of 0.011%. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 0.335% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.16% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 4 posts sampled, 75% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.3K interactions, about 97x its own typical post. Only 4 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
Measured over 4 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.011%, Uldouz sits above the 10th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.081% |
| 75th percentile | 0.439% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 158.1% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 52K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 53K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 51K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 55K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 44K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 43K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 50K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 54K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 62K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 72K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 74K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 81K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 89K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 98K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 101K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 104K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 102K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 94K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 88K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 83K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 77K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 68K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 59K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 53K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 237K |
| Monday | 0% | 300K |
| Tuesday | -3% | 299K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 256K |
| Thursday | -1% | 249K |
| Friday | -3% | 258K |
| Saturday | +3% | 232K |
Best tweets
- Jan 24, 202397x their median
RT if you like! Urgent! Sign My Petition To Urge Congress To Pass The Protect Act, To Protect Children, Women & Men From Being Exploited Online! Sign It Now Or Be A Part Of The Problem! https://t.co/nuTjHPTA4k
- Jun 20, 202620x their median
EXCELLENT ARTICLE details how the @katiehobbs vetoes damaged Arizona by - Allowing Sharia Law - Protecting hormone therapy for children - Giving illegals bank services - Photo fines of $200 not $75 Busy Veto Pen: Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs nixes 88 bills https://t.co/frHOjYOt9F https://t.co/kmG4ZcI9cH
- Jun 24, 20263.8x their median
Today on Social Media Harms Victim Remembrance Day, we honor those we've lost and the families advocating for change. I worked to pass the TAKE IT DOWN Act to combat AI-generated deepfakes, and I'll keep fighting for stronger protections for children and greater accountability for social media companies.
- Jul 21, 20262.9x their median
🤣🤣🤣 https://t.co/LcfdzJHtfZ
- Jun 22, 20262.8x their median
🚨Hobbs Vetoes Bill to Stop Child and Revenge Porn Before It Spreads Rep. Nick Kupper’s Protect Act would have required commercial porn sites to verify age and consent before publishing sexual material “Governor Hobbs and nearly every Democrat in the Legislature chose party politics over children and victims. My bill would have stopped unverified material before it went online and spread beyond a victim’s control. “Consent is not optional, and protecting children should not be partisan. I will bring the Protect Act back next year, and hopefully we will have a governor who actually cares about protecting children from exploitation.” -@AZHouseGOP Rep. @realnickkupper, sponsor of HB 2133. FULL STATEMENT👇 https://t.co/hnDbob4e1K #AZHouseGOP #AZLeg
- Aug 19, 20261.7x their median
X is refusing to pay me for my subscriptions, should I sue? @elonmusk
- Aug 4, 2026
Woman Sparks Debate After Saying, “Men Call Women Gold Diggers, But Nobody Calls Men Labor Diggers” https://t.co/8d8cpijWdM
- Aug 8, 2026
WHY MODERN LIFE FEELS SO ALIENATING - FROM WORK AND COMMUNITY TO SOCIAL https://t.co/YMAmaCpf13
- Aug 1, 2026
Dating apps are losing users as more people say they’re exhausted by ghosting, endless swiping, fake connections, and conversations that go nowhere. People aren’t necessarily giving up on love—they may just be giving up on swipe culture. Have dating apps made dating easier, or just more draining? Read the full article on PostGaze. Dating Apps Are Losing Paying Users as Burnout, Ghosting and Swipe Fatigue Push Singles Away https://t.co/vsckAbWwP2
- Jun 22, 2026
X stole over 1200 of my subscription payments @elonmusk @premium @Support
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 44 interactions against 421K followers, an engagement rate of 0.011%. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 0.335% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.16% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 4 posts sampled, 75% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.3K interactions, about 97x its own typical post. Only 4 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
- What is Uldouz's engagement rate on X?
- Uldouz (@Uldouz) has an engagement rate of 0.011%, based on the median interactions across 4 original posts from the last 30 days against 420,971 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.011%, Uldouz sits above the 10th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @Uldouz have real engagement?
- There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
- When does @Uldouz post?
- Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.2 posts per day across the measured window.