Back to @VICENews's profile

VICE News engagement report

@VICENews - 908K followers on X

Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.001%
of 908K followers
Per impression
0.095%
14K views on a typical post
Reach
1.51%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
13
interactions (median)
Saved
0.022%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.5/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 13 interactions against 908K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 14% of 3,791 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 0.095% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.51% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.5 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 556 interactions, about 43x its own typical post.

Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

VICE News's engagement rate beats 14% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,791 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 7% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.001%, VICE News sits below the 10th percentile of the 36,759 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.434%
p902.10%
p99160.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,759 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,964 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.434%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%79K
12:00 UTC-2%87K
13:00 UTC-3%95K
14:00 UTC-4%98K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-4%99K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%58K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%232K
Monday0%290K
Tuesday-2%281K
Wednesday-1%252K
Thursday-2%245K
Friday-3%254K
Saturday+3%228K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jul 20, 202643x their median

    What would you do if you were seated next to a serial killer? Sean Penn recalls the story of living next to serial killer Richard Ramirez for 30+ days in an L.A. county jail. Full interview on YouTube. https://t.co/Ejvfdpipv1

    4981739240K viewsView on X
  • Jun 9, 202628x their median

    When AI started to work for itself. https://t.co/WmQnYA6yog

    2529013811K viewsView on X
  • Jun 18, 202627x their median

    The UFO conversation has gone from fringe to the Senate floor. @shanesmith30 and @Dan_Farah, director of @ageofdisclosure, discuss what brought about this change and the 80-year cover-up of the existence of non-human intelligent life. Full episode on YouTube. https://t.co/E9EOUGMnz5

    2785015319K viewsView on X
  • Jun 22, 202617x their median

    Did NASA photograph a UAP on the moon 54 years ago? The Pentagon recently declassified an Apollo 17 photograph from 1972 and has no official explanation for three dots in a triangular formation in the lunar sky. @Dan_Farah, director of @ageofdisclosure, explains what this means. https://t.co/mvhodW6vk1

    1723014121K viewsView on X
  • Jun 19, 202616x their median

    Shane Smith is digging through the newly released UAP files ahead of his interview with "The Age of Disclosure" director @Dan_Farah Want to see what he’s looking at? Explore the same files in our @Acrobat PDF Space: https://t.co/usuICvlnYm https://t.co/QFu2ejHK6n

    541446113K viewsView on X
  • Jul 27, 20269.5x their median

    Why the Democrats lost to Trump, according to former Republican strategist @Timodc. https://t.co/rsmdKkC76N

    10589123K viewsView on X
  • Jul 16, 20269.1x their median

    Sean Penn has spent much of his life going places most people only experience through headlines, including wartime Kyiv alongside Volodymyr Zelenskyy. His message to everyone with strong opinions about Ukraine? Go there. https://t.co/XXq4qaBJnO

    83258216K viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 20266.8x their median

    Did the Civil War ever end? Former Republican strategist Tim Miller discusses how President Trump gave Republican Party voters what they always wanted. https://t.co/yWardhjSYi

    7765121K viewsView on X
  • Jun 11, 20264.9x their median

    Shane Smith and Andrew Callaghan sit down with the anonymous creator behind Explosive Media, the Iranian team whose AI-generated LEGO videos became one of the most viewed and controversial media phenomena of the recent Iran-Israel conflict. Full interview on YouTube. https://t.co/c9ejJnxSPQ

    5580112K viewsView on X
  • Jun 23, 20264.2x their median

    Flying orb sightings go back further than you think. @Dan_Farah, director of @ageofdisclosure, on why these objects have been documented for a century, and why they're almost certainly not manmade. https://t.co/lWi9hHLp1Z

    3712329.2K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 13 interactions against 908K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 14% of 3,791 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 0.095% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.51% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.5 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 556 interactions, about 43x its own typical post.

What is VICE News's engagement rate on X?
VICE News (@VICENews) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 15 original posts from the last 30 days against 907,981 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.001%, VICE News sits below the 10th percentile of the 36,759 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @VICENews have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 14% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,791 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @VICENews post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.5 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going