Back to @Valeria_Martell's profile

Valeria Martell engagement report

@Valeria_Martell - 1.5M followers on X

Measured over 90 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.01%
of 1.5M followers
Per impression
1.51%
10K views on a typical post
Reach
0.66%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
154
interactions (median)
Saved
0.029%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
9.07/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 154 interactions against 1.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.01%. Measured over 90 original posts, its engagement rate beats 46% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 10K times each, and 1.51% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.659% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 9.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 90 posts sampled, 57% carry an image or video and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 120x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #adopta, #cdmx, #edomex.

Measured over 90 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026. Recurring tags: #adopta, #cdmx, #edomex.

Compared with accounts its own size

Valeria Martell's engagement rate beats 46% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 68% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.01%, Valeria Martell sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.433%
p902.10%
p99160.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,654 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,977 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.433%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-3%98K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-1%57K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%231K
Monday0%288K
Tuesday-2%278K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%245K
Friday-3%253K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 15, 2026120x their median

    Una persona que no sienta empatía por un animal, es una mala persona. Sencillo.

    16K2.8K8440143K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 2026100x their median

    No, pendejo. Que le quiten la visa a Andrés Manuel López Beltrán no es “intervencionismo extranjero” ni un “atentado contra la soberanía”. Es un país ejerciendo su derecho a decidir a quién deja entrar a su territorio y a quién no. Y resulta que estamos hablando de un señor que pasó de ser el hijo mantenido del presidente a moverse entre lujos y una riqueza bastante difícil de explicar, mientras sobre él y su círculo pesan señalamientos gravísimos por presunto enriquecimiento ilícito, tráfico de influencias y vínculos con el huachicol. México puede decidir quién entra a México. Estados Unidos puede decidir quién entra a Estados Unidos. Soberanía también es eso. Aunque solo les guste cuando la ejerce Morena.

    12K2.8K18920157K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 202653x their median

    🫡🫡 https://t.co/PXT0r6FCp0

    7.1K7472916853K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 202646x their median

    Amigos, ¡les tenemos una MEGA noticia! 🥹🩷 ¡Una adopción totalmente inesperada! 🥹🐶 Hace unos días nos escribieron para preguntarnos por Benito y fueron a conocerlo a la pensión. Quedaron encantados con él, pero hay gatitos en casa, así que el domingo Benito fue de visita para conocerlos… ¡y todo salió de maravilla! 🥰 Mañana se va a prueba de adopción y estamos muy felices, porque Benito apenas lleva dos semanas con nosotros y ya está a un paso de encontrar una familia para siempre. 🥹❤️ Ya guardó lo poquito que tiene en su mochilita 🎒🥹 y Frankie, su amigo que hizo en la pensión, ya se está despidiendo de él. 💔🐶 Nos da mucha ternura verlos así, pero estamos felices de que Benito tenga esta oportunidad. 🥹🩷 Mándenle todos sus buenos deseos a nuestro gordito. 🙏🏻✨

    6.2K6492062161K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 202642x their median

    https://t.co/3LOjLeJ6J7

    4.9K1.5K371327K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 202640x their median

    Amigos… lo de “farmear aura” es cosa de la chaviza. Por eso no le entendemos. ¿Da cringe? UN CHINGO. ¿Parecen pendejos? DEFINITIVAMENTE. ¿Le hacen daño a alguien? NO. Nosotros también fuimos adolescentes, también parecíamos pendejos y también hacíamos cosas que daban un chingo de cringe. La diferencia es que no había TikTok para dejar evidencia en 4K de nuestras mamadas. Ya crecimos, dejamos de hacer el ridículo (bueno, algunos) y ahora nos toca ver cómo las nuevas generaciones encuentran sus propias maneras de verse bien pendejas. Y miren, para ser honesta: entre todas las modas raras de internet, prefiero mil veces a un morro farmeando aura que a los inútiles de los therian.

    5.4K48826736142K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 202636x their median

    Dios mío, líbrame de los que fingen quererme.

    4.1K1.3K237691K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 202633x their median

    😉 https://t.co/qwfG8dYoUs

    4.4K562801854K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 202627x their median

    Por favor, no se olviden que en Vargas hay muchos perros y gatos esperando que alguien los adopte. No se van a arrepentir. Son la mejor compañía que alguien puede tener.

    2.3K1.8K9929K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20269.2x their median

    ¿Por qué las mujeres quieren estar casadas, yo no entiendo? Después solo les toca cocinar, lavar... Y todo gratis 😒🤨

    809784695458K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#adopta#cdmx#edomex#esteriliza#naucalpan

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 154 interactions against 1.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.01%. Measured over 90 original posts, its engagement rate beats 46% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 10K times each, and 1.51% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.659% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 9.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 90 posts sampled, 57% carry an image or video and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 120x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #adopta, #cdmx, #edomex.

What is Valeria Martell's engagement rate on X?
Valeria Martell (@Valeria_Martell) has an engagement rate of 0.01%, based on the median interactions across 90 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,546,349 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.01%, Valeria Martell sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Valeria_Martell have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 46% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Valeria_Martell post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 9.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going