The Vigilant Fox 🦊 engagement report
@VigilantFox - 2.0M followers on X
Measured over 59 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 8.7K interactions against 2.0M followers, an engagement rate of 0.441%. Measured over 59 original posts, its engagement rate beats 97% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 391K times each, and 2.23% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 19.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 59 posts sampled, 95% carry an image or video and 69% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 54K interactions, about 6.2x its own typical post.
Measured over 59 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
The Vigilant Fox 🦊's engagement rate beats 97% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 79% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.441%, The Vigilant Fox 🦊 sits above the 75th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.433% to 2.10%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.08% |
| 75th percentile | 0.433% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 160.5% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 03:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 51K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 52K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 50K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 53K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 43K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 42K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 48K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 52K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 61K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 70K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 72K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 78K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 86K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 94K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 97K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 101K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 98K |
| 17:00 UTC | -2% | 91K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 85K |
| 19:00 UTC | -1% | 80K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 74K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 66K |
| 22:00 UTC | -1% | 57K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 52K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +4% | 231K |
| Monday | 0% | 288K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 278K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 251K |
| Thursday | -1% | 245K |
| Friday | -3% | 253K |
| Saturday | +3% | 227K |
Best tweets
- Aug 11, 20266.2x their median
Neri (and I) had seven miscarriages trying to have a second child during Covid and then the time ran out. WTF was he thinking?
- Aug 12, 20265.7x their median
A Bush White House spokesman drops a bomb on CNN that nobody saw coming: Barack Obama got on the 2008 Indiana primary ballot with FRAUDULENT signatures. And he says it to Obama’s own strategist, David Axelrod, sitting three feet away. AXELROD: [Mocking] "In Arizona, [Trump] hired the cyber ninjas..." SEAT: “I’ll give you an example of where it [election fraud] has been determinative. And that’s in my home state of Indiana, Saint Joseph County. The gentleman you previously worked for, David Axelrod, Barack Obama got on the ballot because Democrats in that county submitted fraudulent ballot petition signatures. People, including the Democrat county chair, went to jail over that. Barack Obama should not have been on the primary ballot in the state of Indiana.” KINZINGER: “But that’s not a voting issue. Like that’s something—” PETE SEAT: “It is a voting issue because he was on the ballot and people could vote for him, and he shouldn't have been.” AXELROD: “How did how did that get determined?” SEAT: “It was finally exposed two years later. It went through the courts, and several people found themselves in jail. But that’s the problem. It didn’t happen. They didn’t find it before he was on the ballot. It took years after.” Pete Seat is right. In 2013, four Indiana Democrats were convicted for forging signatures on the 2008 presidential primary petitions, and county party chair Butch Morgan went to jail for orchestrating it. They literally copied names off old petitions, including a former governor who confirmed he never signed. Election fraud is not a conspiracy theory. It happens, and a county chairman of a major party sat in a jail cell for it.
- Aug 17, 20264.8x their median
Adam Carolla says Chris Cuomo texted him UPSET that he retweeted one of Cuomo's "bad looks" from COVID. Carolla's message to Cuomo is brutal: CAROLLA: "You said a lot of STUPID SH*T during COVID, and I got a lot of sh*t foisted on me thanks to people LIKE YOU saying a lot of stupid sh*t." "Perhaps you should have shut the f*ck up back then... You ATTACKED people, and now people are rubbing it back in your face. That's how the world works." SIDE NOTE: When Chris Cuomo tried to debate Dave Smith on COVID, he literally got BOOED ON STAGE after he denied shaming people for taking ivermectin. Then Dave Smith played the clip and exposed him on the spot. That clip is in the comment below.
- Aug 29, 20264.6x their median
MSNBC contributor tries to corner Byron Donalds on measles and demands to know if he vaxxes his kids. His answer left her looking stupid. And Bill Maher even piled on at the end. MOLLY JONG-FAST: “You’ve had to say some stuff. Like last week on Margaret Brennan’s show, you said rampant illegal immigration was the cause for this measles outbreak and not not being vaccinated. I’m curious. Like, I have three kids. You have three kids. Do you not vaccinate your kids?” BYRON DONALDS: “My oldest son is 23 years old. The vaccination schedule for him was less intense than the vaccination schedule for my 15-year-old son. And if you have talked to my mom, the vaccination schedule for me, being 47 years old, was not nearly as intense as it is for newborns today. “So I think there are parents, there are mothers who have real concerns about the frequency of vaccines for young infants into just being a toddler. And so I think the order that came out the other day from the White House was, well, let’s just spread the vaccination schedule back out. Let parents have an ability to make those decisions for their children with informed consent. And then the last piece is, let’s also make sure that the human body in its infancy can actually manage the amount of vaccines that are being put into their child. I don’t think there’s anything wrong with that.” BILL MAHER: “I don’t either.” JONG-FAST: “We have people dying of measles. We had two people in Ohio die of measles. We were almost eradicated from measles and now we have measles again, and there’s a reason for that. And the idea that you said illegal immigration causes—” DONALDS: “Under the previous administration, more than 10 million people came into the country illegally, and I know for a fact, just like everybody else — you can read your notes too — they weren’t checking their vaccination schedules coming into the United States. That’s a fact. That’s number one. “Number two, there was a measles outbreak in a couple of the detention facilities on the southern border. There was a measles outbreak in El Paso, Texas. There was also one in Chicago at another illegal immigration facility. Those are the facts. “So when you let that many people come into your country, when we already know in other countries they don’t have the vaccination schedule that we have, and then when the Department of Health and Human Services is talking about American children, now you’re finding fault with vaccination schedules for American children? I don’t think that’s an accurate way to look at it.” MAHER: “I had measles as a kid. I loved it. I was home for two weeks. I ate ice cream every day.” CDC schedule, 1983: 11 vaccine doses. CDC schedule, 2024: 70+ vaccine doses.
- Aug 12, 20264.2x their median
Stephen A. Smith drops a blunt reality check on Indiana Fever Coach Stephanie White. SMITH: "There are folks in Indiana at a home game BOOING YOU! You ain’t the road team. You’re the home team... and they’re booing YOU!" "Sophie Cunningham and Caitlin Clark can speak up for you all they want to... but that’s not going to be enough. "[You say] ‘We will go high. Love, grace, humility will win.’ And then you tell everybody to ‘go to hell.’ You think that’s going to work for you, Coach White?" “How are you the head coach... and you didn’t see the play? ... It’s your job to... watch the game. How did you not see the play?!” When asked about Dijonai Carrington clotheslining Sophie Cunningham in the face, Coach White claimed: "I didn't see the play in real time. I went straight to a press conference. I thought the play got called right. Thankfully, Sophie's okay. Was it egregious? Absolutely. When you have a chance to watch that over and over and over on replay, you can see that. I didn't have that in real time." Pictures are now surfacing online and contradicting that statement, because she was staring straight at Dijonai Carrington and Sophie Cunningham when the vicious foul happened.
- Aug 11, 20264.1x their median
An outraged Ainsley Earhardt says the RAGE of mothers who lost unborn babies to the COVID shot is going to unleash HELL on “the experts” who told us it was safe. Now even people like Meghan McCain are saying Fauci needs to be JAILED. EARHARDT: “This is going to open a whole new can of worms. People are going to SUE because they’re going to be so upset about this.” “They lost their children... How many children are in Heaven because of that misinformation?” In January 2021, Fauci privately told the then-CDC director and surgeon general that vaccination, specifically the second dose, “could be associated with miscarriage in the 1st trimester.” Not a word about the miscarriage risk was ever spoken publicly. Instead, people like Rochelle Walensky told the public that “it is absolutely safe” for pregnant women to get vaccinated and that there is “no bad time” to get jabbed. After learning about this, Meghan McCain wrote on X in all caps: “PUT FAUCI IN JAIL!!!!” “I am a woman who was pregnant and had a miscarriage during COVID.” People will accept a lot of bullshit without putting up a fight. But when you mess with a mother and her baby, there’s no coming back from that.
- Aug 15, 20263.2x their median
CNN commentator earns applause from Bill Maher's liberal audience after heaping PRAISE on Trump Accounts. ANDERSON: "Regardless of what you think about Donald Trump, this is a ‘You got to hand it to him.’ These Trump accounts for young kids... are enormously valuable!" “Compound interest is insane. This is an incredible way to help kids, the next generation." [Applause] The architect of the Trump Accounts recently did the math live for Maria Bartiromo on what a $10/week investment becomes over time. BRAD GERSTNER: “If you start with $1,000 and it’s matched at birth and you save… $10 a week.” “It’s $50,000 at age 18…” “$200,000 at age 30…” “And it’s $1,000,000 at age 55.”
- Aug 12, 20263.1x their median
Sophie Cunningham (6'1" guard) runs halfway across the court to BLOCK 6'11" Chinese center Han Xu at the 3-point line. Han goes back to the bench, shaking her head. https://t.co/iOUAOSIMB6
- Aug 10, 20263.0x their median
Stephen A. Smith breaks down how the WNBA is now TRAPPED after Enes Kanter Freedom and Royce White declared for the league. Not only do they risk LEGAL ACTION if they deny them entry, but the commissioner alone cannot take care of the issue. The players themselves have to help define who is and who is not eligible to play, and good luck to them on figuring that out 😂
- Aug 31, 20262.7x their median
Stephen A. Smith says he only took home ONE-THIRD of his annual income living in California. His ESPN salary alone is $20,000,000 a year. That means the government took over $13,300,000 in taxes. He now lives in Florida. SMITH: "I can't stand high taxes. And if y'all think I'm lying, federal income tax is nearly 40% for people in my range. And then on top of it all is an additional 13.6% in the state of California. And we ain't even getting the LA city tax, and we ain't getting the FICA, and Social Security and disability." "You walking home with less than 34% of your money messing around in California! I got a problem with that." "It's similar in New York. I got a problem with that. So because of that, I speak out against liberal policies that come to take your money." Here is what the tax breakdown looks like on a $20,000,000 salary: • Federal income tax (37% top rate): ~$7,360,000 • California income tax (13.3% top rate): ~$2,630,000 • California SDI payroll tax (1.2%, no cap): ~$240,000 • Medicare (2.35% for top earners): ~$470,000 • Social Security (capped): ~$11,000 TOTAL: Over $10,700,000 a year, before property taxes, sales taxes, and city business taxes. Florida state income tax: $0. That means Smith saves over $2,870,000 a year ($7,860 a day) on state income taxes alone. Sales tax is also 2.75% cheaper in Florida. No wonder he moved.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 8.7K interactions against 2.0M followers, an engagement rate of 0.441%. Measured over 59 original posts, its engagement rate beats 97% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 391K times each, and 2.23% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 19.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 59 posts sampled, 95% carry an image or video and 69% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 54K interactions, about 6.2x its own typical post.
- What is The Vigilant Fox 🦊's engagement rate on X?
- The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) has an engagement rate of 0.441%, based on the median interactions across 59 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,975,824 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.441%, The Vigilant Fox 🦊 sits above the 75th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @VigilantFox have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 97% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @VigilantFox post?
- Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.13 posts per day across the measured window.