Back to @WanjunXie's profile

谢万军 Wanjun Xie engagement report

@WanjunXie - 169K followers on X

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 26, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.051%
of 169K followers
Per impression
0.515%
16K views on a typical post
Reach
9.80%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
82
interactions (median)
Saved
0.05%
8 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.93/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 82 interactions against 169K followers, an engagement rate of 0.051%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 47% of 21,624 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 0.515% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.40% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.7K interactions, about 33x its own typical post.

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 26, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

谢万军 Wanjun Xie's engagement rate beats 47% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,624 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 27% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.051%, 谢万军 Wanjun Xie sits above the 25th percentile of the 217,635 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.148%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.148%
p750.704%
p902.63%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 217,635 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 21,696 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.148%
75th percentile0.704%
90th percentile2.63%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video88% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link6% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 88% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 6% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 151 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Apr 9, 202433x their median

    【中国民主党中央党部诚邀天下仁人志士秘密加入中国民主党】做为一名心系国家,心怀正义和坚守个体自由的有识之士,一定会盼望中国能摆脱中共的独裁统治,14亿中国人能获得自由,国家能走向民主,但是,面对邪恶无比,强大无比的中共政权,个人的力量显得太渺小了。个人与中共政权对抗,自然会感到无奈和诅丧,甚至绝望。 中国民主党就是要广聚天下的仁人志士,为国民的自由和解放而奋斗,为国家的民主和文明而奋斗。如果有千千万万的中国民主党党员,每个人都能拿出1%的时间和精力,为中国的自由民主事业做一些事,就会形成巨大的政治能量,使得中国民主党能在历史转折关头,有能力和机会改变国民的命运,改变国家的命运。 70多年来,我们几代人遭受中共的独裁统治,我们不能让我们的子孙继续遭受中共的独裁统治了,为此,中国民主党中央党部恳请您能考虑加入中国民主党,成为一名秘密党员,在确保你的安全,在不影响你的正常工作和生活的前提下,能为中国的民主事业做出一些贡献。有您的参与和支持,将是中国民主党的荣耀。 中国民主党入党申请:195064@gmail.com,zgmzd1998@gmail.com,cdpf2001@hotmail.com,或者通过推特私信直接回复。来信请提供一个中文化名和六位数密码(党禁解除后,将通过化名、密码和党员号码来确认秘密党员身份)。为了保护你的安全,回信中请勿透漏任何你个人的背景和资讯。详情请浏览中国民主党网站:https://t.co/5nxTTUeRsI。

    890891.7K143.0M viewsView on X
  • Oct 25, 202621x their median

    看一看金正恩的耳朵,就可以看出,10月24日,访问中国丹东的金正恩是替身。用替身访问中国,还由中共党内第三号人物李强、第四号人物王沪宁亲自配合演戏,这说明,金正恩已经去世了的传言,应该是真实的。 https://t.co/EGJTQvNA1k

    1.3K20416223508K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 202612x their median

    It is rumored that Ren Zhengfei and Meng Wanzhou fell to their deaths on the evening of September 20th! Other rumors also claim...Ren Zhengfei and Meng Wanzhou did not commit suicide, but were murdered, and the order to murder them came from the top leadership of the Chinese Communist Party. As originally planned, Chinese Communist Party General Secretary Xi Jinping was scheduled to visit the United States on September 24. During this visit, the US would inevitably request the extradition of Ren Zhengfei and Meng Wanzhou to the US for trial, making this a top priority in Sino-US negotiations. At this crucial and sensitive moment, the Chinese authorities would naturally arrange for Ren Zhengfei and Meng Wanzhou to commit suicide. Of course, the Chinese Communist Party authorities may also arrange for Ren Zhengfei and Meng Wanzhou to fake their deaths. This would both save their lives and deceive the United States, preventing the US from prosecuting them.

    7121578925297K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20266.4x their median

    据传,在9月21日召开中央政治局会议上,由习近平亲自提出,在中共内部,不再进行路线斗争,不再清理派系。以后,在中共党内,所有官员,可以主张马列主义、毛泽东思想、邓小平理论、三个代表、科学发展观和习近平思想,但是,他们必须忠诚于习近平,忠诚于习家。 据称,习近平家族内部决定,要加速将习近平的女儿习明泽,扶持到中共党政军最高领导人的位置上。习近平家族计划在五中全会后,由习明泽以代理中央办公厅副主任的名义,担任习近平与中共党政军高级官员之间的唯一联络人,届时,任何官员必须通过习明泽的安排,才能见到习近平。此外,习近平家族还计划,在中共21大召开前,将由习明泽代表习近平,与所有副省军级以上官员一对一进行谈话,以确认这些官员是否会效忠习明泽。对于那些拒绝效忠习明泽的官员,将由习近平出面,迅速予以清除。这样,在中共21大召开时,所有党政军高级官员就都会效忠习明泽。到那时,习明泽就变成了能接任中共党政军最高领导人唯一人选了。 习近平开始安排后事了,中国也将出现女皇帝了!

    3167511421166K viewsView on X
  • Oct 25, 20266.4x their median

    这是中俄官媒发部的,10月24日,王沪宁和金正恩走在鸭绿江大桥上的视频中的照片。看看左图中的旗帜,都被大风吹成平面了,这说明,当时正刮着大风。再看右图,中朝两国的女翻译,在大风中,在毫无遮挡的大桥上,头发竟然没有被吹变形。这明显不是拍摄的视频,而是用AI生成的视频。 用AI生成的视频来为金正恩已经出事了的传言辟谣,这反倒证实了,金正恩已经出事了的传言,很可能是真实的。

    40066517164K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20265.0x their median

    据传,经过医疗专家团队的准备,万一习近平在访美期间再次发生严重的脑中风,其死亡和瘫痪的概率会降至10%以下,因此,习近平本人决定,他将如期访问美国。 据称,9月21日中央政治局召开了会议,会上多数委员主张习近平推迟或取消访问美国的计划,因为他们担忧习近平万一再次发生严重的脑中风,会危及习近平的生命安全。 据称,习近平还亲自安排了医疗专家,向中央政治局汇报了他的身体健康状况,以及出访美国的健康风险,和医疗团队即将采取的应急措施。医疗专家建议,为习近平治疗和做手术的心血管医疗专家团队,可以全员随习近平前往美国,同时,所有治疗心血管疾病的医疗设备和手术设备,都安装在习近平的专机上。习近平在访问途中,万一发生意外,飞机可在就近的机场降落,并在飞机上进行紧急治疗和手术。如果飞机仍在太平洋上空飞行,不得已的情况下,也可以在飞机上做应急治疗。 据称,经过医疗专家的准备,习近平万一再次发生严重脑中风时,其死亡的概率会降至10%以下。据此,习近平本人在中央政治局会议上做出决定,他将如期访问美国。

    25266831056K viewsView on X
  • Oct 24, 20263.9x their median

    其实,习近平的目标很明确,就是为了建立习家世袭政权,为了让习明泽顺利接班,为了让习明泽能顺利当上中国的女皇帝,为了习家世世代代能统治中国,而不断的杀人。现在,不论谁挡了路,习近平就杀谁。这真是,人当杀人,佛挡杀佛,已经杀疯了。至于习近平高喊的,为了国家,为了人民,要“从严治党”,那只是扯犊子!

    23422594119K viewsView on X
  • Oct 25, 20263.3x their median

    10月24日,广西北海市市政府门前,民众冲塔,警察开枪镇压! https://t.co/mvBEGey38k

    1863048359K viewsView on X
  • Oct 23, 20262.7x their median

    据传,习近平的首席护卫和打手,公安部长王小洪,因身体健康原因即将退休。据称,王小洪为习近平夺取独裁权力,立下了汗马功劳,但是,习近平也担心,一旦自己去世,王小洪可能会被背叛其继任者习明泽,并参与推翻习明泽皇权的政变。习近平此时让王小洪退休,已经是很给王小洪面子了。 据称,在2024年7月,中共三中全会上,张又侠发动会场政变时,王小洪没有率领在会场中的公安部特勤局部队进行抵抗,反而选择与张又侠合作。最为明显的事件,是三中全会刚一结束,王小洪赴贵州考察时,不再提习近平了,这与他先前,开口讲话前,必先提习近平,然后才开始讲话的表现,大相径庭。这反映出,习近平掌权时,王小洪是一副嘴脸,习近平失去权力后,王小洪又是另一副嘴脸。这大概就是习近平极其反感的所谓“两面人”了吧。 由于王小洪帮助习近平成功抓捕了前中央军委副主席张又侠和前中央军委联合参谋部参谋长刘振立,并帮助习近平夺回了权力,所以,王小洪对习近平是有功劳的。估计,习近平是看在王小洪的这份功劳上,才让他以身体健康为由退休的,而不是把他送到秦城监狱去。 不论如何,我们都会看到,习近平在处理王小洪一事上,看出了习近平过河拆桥和卸磨杀驴的本性,也看到了飞鸟尽良弓藏,狡兔死周狗烹这句成语的精妙之处。

    1863201111K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20262.6x their median

    据传,格力集团公司董事长董明珠被逮捕! https://t.co/cQLWKg8osb

    1502236433K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 82 interactions against 169K followers, an engagement rate of 0.051%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 47% of 21,624 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 0.515% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.40% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.7K interactions, about 33x its own typical post.

What is 谢万军 Wanjun Xie's engagement rate on X?
谢万军 Wanjun Xie (@WanjunXie) has an engagement rate of 0.051%, based on the median interactions across 17 original posts from the last 30 days against 169,327 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.051%, 谢万军 Wanjun Xie sits above the 25th percentile of the 217,635 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @WanjunXie have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 47% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,624 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @WanjunXie post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.93 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going