We Have It All engagement report
@WeAreWoke1776_3 - 161K followers on X
Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 26, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 256 interactions against 161K followers, an engagement rate of 0.159%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 67% of 21,624 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.1K times each, and 4.20% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.78% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 75% carry an image or video, 5% are part of a thread and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 32K interactions, about 124x its own typical post.
Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 26, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
We Have It All's engagement rate beats 67% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,624 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 82% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.159%, We Have It All sits above the 50th percentile of the 217,857 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.149% to 0.705%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.149% |
| 75th percentile | 0.705% |
| 90th percentile | 2.63% |
| 99th percentile | 82.6% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 75% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 10% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 75% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 10% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 136 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Jun 5, 2023124x their median
When this all breaks wide open, you’ll either be mentally prepared or you’ll be in shock. #Prepare your mind, heart & soul. It’s really ugly. https://t.co/q0b8Lb9NbJ
- Sep 21, 2026115x their median
https://t.co/eZr8ViTY4t
- Oct 22, 2026104x their median
Ilhan Omar… January 3, 2019: Sworn in January 17, 2019: Appointed to House Foreign Affairs Committee In just 14 days… Ilhan was receiving sensitive Classified Info on US Foreign Policy and National Security. This is a National Security crisis.
- Sep 19, 202639x their median
DRAIN THE SWAMP FINISH THE JOB
- Oct 23, 202630x their median
Ilhan Nur Said Elmi aka Ilhan Abdullahi Omar Isn’t the only one… Foreign members of Congress: Senate: 6 House: 26 None had FBI background checks. None had to disclose dual citizenship. All got classified info. Read that again. How is this not a National Security risk?
- Oct 23, 202613x their median
Dear Voters: The Democrats' long-stated goal is to destroy American fossil fuels. Do you *really* think Democrats will bring down high fuel prices? Don't get duped.
- Oct 21, 202613x their median
PHOTO 1: Ilhan Nur Said Elmi PHOTO 2: Ilhan Abdullahi Omar https://t.co/MC73Pc0cTj
- Oct 23, 202612x their median
HOLEE CRAP HOW DID I MISS THIS ONE?? "Psyop" "Ya ever hear of the Smith Mundt Act" 🤩 Big HT to @RamboAndFrens for sharing this on the RQUNDTABLE earlier today. This video from August 12,2026 and the YT link is not viewable in the USA ✌️ https://t.co/vMao6tUFVS
- Oct 23, 202612x their median
Science: A New Golden Age https://t.co/xnGEXzISNC
- Sep 18, 202611x their median
BREAKING: Warren Buffett steps down as Berkshire Hathaway chairman, to remain chairman emeritus; son Howard to take over company https://t.co/SzLMuxxYqs
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 256 interactions against 161K followers, an engagement rate of 0.159%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 67% of 21,624 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.1K times each, and 4.20% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.78% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 75% carry an image or video, 5% are part of a thread and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 32K interactions, about 124x its own typical post.
- What is We Have It All's engagement rate on X?
- We Have It All (@WeAreWoke1776_3) has an engagement rate of 0.159%, based on the median interactions across 20 original posts from the last 30 days against 160,836 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.159%, We Have It All sits above the 50th percentile of the 217,857 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @WeAreWoke1776_3 have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 67% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,624 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @WeAreWoke1776_3 post?
- Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.43 posts per day across the measured window.