Back to @YourAnonOne's profile

Anonymous engagement report

@YourAnonOne - 1.7M followers on X

Measured over 94 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.017%
of 1.7M followers
Per impression
0.503%
59K views on a typical post
Reach
3.41%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
296
interactions (median)
Saved
0.032%
19 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.13/day
active 67% of days
Peak time
11:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 296 interactions against 1.7M followers, an engagement rate of 0.017%. Measured over 94 original posts, its engagement rate beats 55% of 3,739 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 59K times each, and 0.503% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.41% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 94 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 85K interactions, about 287x its own typical post.

Measured over 94 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Anonymous's engagement rate beats 55% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,739 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 39% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.017%, Anonymous sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.431%
p902.10%
p99160.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,137 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.431%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%51K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%69K
10:00 UTC-2%71K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%93K
14:00 UTC-3%96K
15:00 UTC-2%100K
16:00 UTC-3%97K
17:00 UTC-2%90K
18:00 UTC-1%84K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%229K
Monday0%284K
Tuesday-2%273K
Wednesday-1%250K
Thursday-2%243K
Friday-3%251K
Saturday+3%226K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 21, 2026287x their median

    There is a wave of "superheroes" trying to hunt down the GTA 6 leaker. Imagine having zero shame doing free detective work for a billion-dollar corporation that couldn't care less about its consumers.

    77K7.6K5711961.2M viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202644x their median

    Why can't they find him? It's starting to feel like... https://t.co/ke91RiISEJ

    12K3855316422K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 202631x their median

    According to their official Telegram, the hacker group 808mafia claims to have an old Xbox build of GTA 6. They are offering to trade it with Cyberleek, who reportedly has a PC build of the game.

    8.8K3206634524K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 202629x their median

    PlayStation sent out a reminder about its Terms of Service. Here are the key points you need to know: -You do not own digital games; you only buy a license to use them. -If your account gets suspended or closed, you lose access to all purchased digital games. -PlayStation can monitor your activities, including communications, gameplay, and IP addresses. -Your shared content can be used in their ads without any compensation to you.

    7.2K1.0K280104578K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202621x their median

    Don't download any GTA 6 files online. They are fake and usually contain viruses or malware that use your computer to mine cryptocurrency. Even if real files could leak at any moment.

    5.7K3755317221K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 202619x their median

    Do not download any supposed GTA 6 files from websites like Reddit. These downloads are completely fake and are actually malware designed to infect your devices.

    5.1K3836820221K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202618x their median

    New rumors claim the GTA 6 leaker CyberLeek has a build of the game fully ready to drop online. Reports suggest he is manually delaying the release, warning the files will automatically upload if anything happens to him.

    5.2K2285015233K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 202618x their median

    Some people think the GTA 6 leaks are a communication strategy by Rockstar, but this is completely false. The leaks caused their parent company to lose $2.8 billion in market value.

    5.1K217657166K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202616x their median

    Rockstar confirmed that GTA 6 was built without any generative AI. Every single asset in the game was created by human artists, including well over 600,000 hand-crafted NPC animations. https://t.co/zMQrxakCI4

    4.5K123507101K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 202615x their median

    The leaker behind the footage showing the very beginning of the GTA 6 prologue "CyberLeek" dropped a concerning message regarding the state of the game. "This build is actually recent and the game is not ready at all. The work required to reach gold is way too much for so little time left."

    4.1K187889573K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 296 interactions against 1.7M followers, an engagement rate of 0.017%. Measured over 94 original posts, its engagement rate beats 55% of 3,739 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 59K times each, and 0.503% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.41% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 94 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 85K interactions, about 287x its own typical post.

What is Anonymous's engagement rate on X?
Anonymous (@YourAnonOne) has an engagement rate of 0.017%, based on the median interactions across 94 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,724,812 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.017%, Anonymous sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @YourAnonOne have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 55% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,739 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @YourAnonOne post?
Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going