Back to @ZaidBalll's profile

(fan) Zaid βœπŸΌπŸ‡ΎπŸ‡ͺ engagement report

@ZaidBalll - 474K followers on X

Measured over 37 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.467%
of 474K followers
Per impression
6.60%
34K views on a typical post
Reach
7.08%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.2K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.033%
11 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.37/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 2.2K interactions against 474K followers, an engagement rate of 0.467%. Measured over 37 original posts, its engagement rate beats 90% of 3,899 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 34K times each, and 6.60% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.07% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 37 posts sampled, 73% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 72K interactions, about 32x its own typical post.

Measured over 37 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026. Recurring tag: #areyouabaleba.

Compared with accounts its own size

(fan) Zaid βœπŸΌπŸ‡ΎπŸ‡ͺ's engagement rate beats 90% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,899 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 95% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.467%, (fan) Zaid βœπŸΌπŸ‡ΎπŸ‡ͺ sits above the 75th percentile of the 37,701 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.439% to 2.10%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99156.3%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,701 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 104,204 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile156.3%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%53K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%52K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%63K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%75K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%90K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-3%101K
15:00 UTC-2%105K
16:00 UTC-4%102K
17:00 UTC-3%95K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%69K
22:00 UTC-2%60K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%238K
Monday0%302K
Tuesday-3%302K
Wednesday-1%257K
Thursday-2%250K
Friday-3%259K
Saturday+3%233K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • May 25, 202432x their median

    WHAT A PICTURE!πŸ˜πŸ”΄ https://t.co/jfPKKioYJl

    63K7.5K3112287.8M viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20263.6x their median

    🚨Manchester United will FACE Atletico Madrid AWAY!!!πŸ‘€ https://t.co/N8bjxV3GqC

    7.7K2391613165K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20263.0x their median

    Mazraoui - Bayern Munich De Ligt - Bayern Munich Bruno Fernandes - Sporting Lisbon Benjamin Sesko - RB Leipzig Matheus Cunha - RB Leipzig Returns for many of our players in the UCL.

    6.2K32616263K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20262.8x their median

    Yanited representation at the PFA Awards. πŸ˜… https://t.co/kukeErZjqX

    5.9K2014934253K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20262.6x their median

    🚨Bruno Fernandes on which player owes him the most dinners because he created the most chances for them: β€œI will give you three. Anthony Martial, Marcus Rashford. I would say even if it’s still a small period Benjamin Sesko” [Beast Mode on Podcast] https://t.co/dSvmFRwQkR

    5.5K1418594K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20262.5x their median

    You can have four beautiful pictures.❀️😍 https://t.co/rA2lzJ3OEE

    5.3K2746341K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20262.4x their median

    A lovely return for Bruno Fernandes away at Sporting Lisbon in the Champions League. https://t.co/C5XPyBamBk

    5.2K15211445K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20262.3x their median

    Beating Villareal away in the UCL? Easy for some. https://t.co/VIzfdZe2lw

    4.9K1076137K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20262.2x their median

    You’ll notice in all your favourite midfielders which everyone rates in the Premier League there’s always one man that has β€œmore.” That man is Bruno Fernandes.πŸ‡΅πŸ‡Ή https://t.co/U5zzgfsMYP

    4.7K25314971K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20261.9x their median

    🚨Man Utd will FACE Bayern Munich at Old Trafford! https://t.co/3uTYPAe9DU

    4.2K589339K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#areyouabaleba

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.2K interactions against 474K followers, an engagement rate of 0.467%. Measured over 37 original posts, its engagement rate beats 90% of 3,899 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 34K times each, and 6.60% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.07% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 37 posts sampled, 73% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 72K interactions, about 32x its own typical post.

What is (fan) Zaid βœπŸΌπŸ‡ΎπŸ‡ͺ's engagement rate on X?
(fan) Zaid βœπŸΌπŸ‡ΎπŸ‡ͺ (@ZaidBalll) has an engagement rate of 0.467%, based on the median interactions across 37 original posts from the last 30 days against 473,757 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.467%, (fan) Zaid βœπŸΌπŸ‡ΎπŸ‡ͺ sits above the 75th percentile of the 37,701 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ZaidBalll have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 90% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,899 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ZaidBalll post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going