Back to @_brainsofweb3's profile

brains 𓃵 engagement report

@_brainsofweb3 - 376K followers on X

Measured over 32 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.043%
of 376K followers
Per impression
1.25%
13K views on a typical post
Reach
3.42%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
160
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.47/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 160 interactions against 376K followers, an engagement rate of 0.043%. Measured over 32 original posts, its engagement rate beats 38% of 3,775 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 1.25% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.42% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 32 posts sampled, 25% carry an image or video and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.1K interactions, about 44x its own typical post.

Measured over 32 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

brains 𓃵's engagement rate beats 38% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,775 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 48% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.043%, brains 𓃵 sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.433%
p902.10%
p99160.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,654 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,977 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.433%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-3%98K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-1%57K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%231K
Monday0%288K
Tuesday-2%278K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%245K
Friday-3%253K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 28, 202644x their median

    Traders when they overtrade and blow their accounts… https://t.co/0BUlZR5v3C

    5.8K833291111346K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202614x their median

    BRO FUCK MEMECOINS man. If you bout to put any money into this shit don't even fucking do it. I'm keeping it real with y'all man. All these niggas out here fucking lying to y'all. You not finna make a million dollars, you not finna make 200 thousand, you not making shit from here. Dem niggas telling you to buy a coin so they can get the fuck out that coin. That shit gon' drop like crazy, you gon' lose all your fucking money. I had 4 thousand in my account bro, 4 bandz. How the fuck do I have 63 dollars in my fucking account right now. Where the fuck did my money go? Who the fuck took my money? 4 thousand dollars. GONE!!!!!!!! They tell you gon' rich quick. FUCK NO!!!! This shit is literally worse than gambling. It's not even a 50/50 chance you gon' win. It's a 99 to 1 chance yo ass is gon' win. You gon' put all yo money into a coin, that shit is gonna drop!!!! Exit liquidity!

    1.6K8641351201K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20268.0x their median

    Brains was really in the trenches back then. Called SOL below $20. 1,000x Elon. 1,000x Vine. 500x Trump. 1,000x BONK. And that’s just the highlights. Old account got nuked, but the receipts remain in my head. Fuck it. Let’s trench this bull one last time. 😂

    1.0K110128361K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20267.2x their median

    if a coin dumps 80% and still survives you need to hold that shit for life

    861511983760K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20263.1x their median

    Bro turned $88 into $2,4000,000 One trade can change your life https://t.co/0SQk18kw9D

    3971581744K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20261.7x their median

    Fvck the insiders. Fvck the cabals. Daily CTO, straight from the trenches. RT if you’re in. Enough likes and I’ll drop the update.

    2153120013K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 2026

    RT and drop your SOL address below. That’s what I usually do most of the time, but somehow none of you have ever asked for my SOL address before. Show some love today, fvckers! 👇 DZKBnaszm8eMSkbK1L95UuBwy3wfjixuy8GH9nfdMLhQ

    1185367113K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 2026

    Good morning, degens. It costs $0 to say it back.

    1352070112K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 2026

    Brains on PumpFun Brains on FOMO. https://t.co/8GbzTVrYHr

    1512943214K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 2026

    YOU STILL SLEEPING?

    1221661212K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 160 interactions against 376K followers, an engagement rate of 0.043%. Measured over 32 original posts, its engagement rate beats 38% of 3,775 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 1.25% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.42% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 32 posts sampled, 25% carry an image or video and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.1K interactions, about 44x its own typical post.

What is brains 𓃵's engagement rate on X?
brains 𓃵 (@_brainsofweb3) has an engagement rate of 0.043%, based on the median interactions across 32 original posts from the last 30 days against 375,728 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.043%, brains 𓃵 sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @_brainsofweb3 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 38% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,775 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @_brainsofweb3 post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.47 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going