Back to @adam3us's profile

Adam Back engagement report

@adam3us - 963K followers on X

Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.023%
of 963K followers
Per impression
0.985%
22K views on a typical post
Reach
2.29%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
216
interactions (median)
Saved
0.08%
18 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
5.13/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
23:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 216 interactions against 963K followers, an engagement rate of 0.023%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 47% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 22K times each, and 0.985% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.28% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video, 7% are part of a thread and 29% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.6K interactions, about 7.5x its own typical post.

Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026. Recurring tag: #bitcoin.

Compared with accounts its own size

Adam Back's engagement rate beats 47% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 50% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.023%, Adam Back sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.434%
p902.10%
p99160.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,521 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,166 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.434%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 23:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%69K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%100K
16:00 UTC-3%97K
17:00 UTC-2%90K
18:00 UTC-1%84K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%230K
Monday0%286K
Tuesday-2%276K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%244K
Friday-3%252K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jul 8, 20267.5x their median

    BULL is challenging in court the EU's dangerous mass surveillance program for crypto users, DAC8. I cannot stand by and do nothing while faceless globalist bureaucrats put the security and privacy of millions of Europeans at risk. We will get DAC8 repealed. https://t.co/HO7xSsIbFw

    1.2K293723396K viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 20266.8x their median

    #bitcoin passes $63k 200wma https://t.co/Ac93xIjFFQ https://t.co/EyQwAi1JgH

    1.3K140498185K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 20244.3x their median

    Today we disclose Dark Skippy - a powerful new method for a malicious signing device to leak secret keys. With a modified signing function, a device can efficiently and covertly exfiltrate a master secret seed by embedding it within transaction signatures. https://t.co/dY543hChfM

    56018076106320K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20263.9x their median

    bitcoin-only hww, custody: complexity is the enemy of security. many alts don't have multisig or schnorr, one sizel lowest-common-denominator resulted in questionable custody architecture choices. bitcoin has cleanest architected, no alt marketing bullshit, hardcore security tech

    6826780759K viewsView on X
  • Jun 16, 20262.6x their median

    Bottom is where Bitfinex whales start buying at volume. If you want to succeed in crypto markets, you'll do well to remember that. https://t.co/WqN2w8zxdT

    4885819549K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20262.6x their median

    Bitcoin is the new wonder of the world, more work & human ingenuity than went into the Great Pyramids of Egypt. The biggest computation ever done, a digital monument, a verifiable artifact of digital gold — the foundation of a new digital age. - @adam3us https://t.co/eCS0C5lJwP

    44989101026K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20262.4x their median

    may i suggested BIM for the BIP 110 hard forked air drop coin. they seem to like "bitcoin is money" for their reddit. if they don't chose a ticker, exchanges will do it for them, and on past experience they may not even all chose the same ticker for the same airdrop/fork future!

    321311203768K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20261.9x their median

    We successfully submitted the ICANN .bitcoin TLD application for Community Priority Evaluation with over 50+ letters of endorsement from within the community, together with several high-level letters of recognition. ICANN will reveal our full application sometime in November 2026 https://t.co/hlQaNEev4Q

    3314725932K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20261.6x their median

    What level of delusion is this? https://t.co/3FnjUPJ3xD

    3011038322K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20261.6x their median

    When you download Bitcoin Core today, the binary doesn't contain everything your node runs. It still loads the C library (glibc and friends) from your operating system which means there are version requirements, behavior that can vary from machine to machine, and code that your node executes that isn’t covered by reproducible builds. New static test builds pack it all into one deterministic Bitcoin Core binary. @fanquake is asking node runners to test out these new static binaries and report results.

    2715317530K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#bitcoin

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 216 interactions against 963K followers, an engagement rate of 0.023%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 47% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 22K times each, and 0.985% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.28% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video, 7% are part of a thread and 29% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.6K interactions, about 7.5x its own typical post.

What is Adam Back's engagement rate on X?
Adam Back (@adam3us) has an engagement rate of 0.023%, based on the median interactions across 28 original posts from the last 30 days against 963,013 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.023%, Adam Back sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @adam3us have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 47% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @adam3us post?
Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 5.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going