Adam Rank engagement report
@adamrank - 493K followers on X
Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 53 interactions against 493K followers, an engagement rate of 0.011%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 31% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 0.332% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.23% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 65% carry an image or video and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.3K interactions, about 81x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #bears, #dabears, #beardown.
Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026. Recurring tags: #bears, #dabears, #beardown.
Compared with accounts its own size
Adam Rank's engagement rate beats 31% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 25% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.011%, Adam Rank sits above the 10th percentile of the 37,701 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.081% |
| 75th percentile | 0.439% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 156.3% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 53K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 53K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 52K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 55K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 44K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 43K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 50K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 54K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 63K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 72K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 75K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 81K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 98K |
| 14:00 UTC | -3% | 101K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 105K |
| 16:00 UTC | -4% | 102K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 95K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 88K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 83K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 77K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 69K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 60K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 53K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 238K |
| Monday | 0% | 302K |
| Tuesday | -3% | 302K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 257K |
| Thursday | -2% | 250K |
| Friday | -3% | 259K |
| Saturday | +3% | 233K |
Best tweets
- Apr 22, 201681x their median
Pat Tillman was the realest dude ever. I share some recollections of him here: https://t.co/qMi57DztpE https://t.co/O25RS3BYLU
- Aug 23, 202631x their median
I sort of like that the Bears are underperformed here. Because Ben Johnson is not about to put up with that garbage.
- Aug 23, 202626x their median
Thank goodness Colston Loveland avoided injury on a blatant hip-drop on Saturday night. Looks like the officials are already in midseason form missing blatant roughing penalties against the Bears. Let’s go ahead and put the Bears offensive stars in bubble wrap and see you in September.
- Aug 18, 202617x their median
We aren't talking enough about Colston Loveland. https://t.co/jzIu2kRhFo
- Aug 21, 20266.9x their median
I don't want to get ahead of myself and say I'm getting 2001 vibes about the Angels. But I really like the work that we've done since Perry was let go. We might be more like 2000 Angels, but I love the direction.
- Aug 25, 20263.0x their median
Still can't believe what the Browns are doing. https://t.co/OuadQbDVAk
- Aug 23, 20263.0x their median
What a strike to Jahdae! https://t.co/eplY8fqQQ8
- Aug 18, 20262.7x their median
Oh, I'm also all about Amon-Ra St. Brown, too. https://t.co/ixcudoc0sE
- Aug 27, 20262.5x their median
New hat representing the legend @creamsleeve https://t.co/d37qrjNjpU
- Aug 20, 2026
Marvin Harrison Jr. is worth the risk. https://t.co/AvY35ERhJ0
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 53 interactions against 493K followers, an engagement rate of 0.011%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 31% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 0.332% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.23% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 65% carry an image or video and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.3K interactions, about 81x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #bears, #dabears, #beardown.
- What is Adam Rank's engagement rate on X?
- Adam Rank (@adamrank) has an engagement rate of 0.011%, based on the median interactions across 17 original posts from the last 30 days against 493,441 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.011%, Adam Rank sits above the 10th percentile of the 37,701 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @adamrank have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 31% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @adamrank post?
- Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.