Back to @alferdez's profile

Alberto Fernández engagement report

@alferdez - 2.2M followers on X

Measured over 49 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.041%
of 2.2M followers
Per impression
2.82%
32K views on a typical post
Reach
1.46%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
901
interactions (median)
Saved
0.047%
15 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
5.67/day
active 67% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 901 interactions against 2.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.041%. Measured over 49 original posts, its engagement rate beats 70% of 3,829 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 32K times each, and 2.82% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.46% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 49 posts sampled, 82% carry an image or video and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 14K interactions, about 16x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #milei, #andis, #argentina.

Measured over 49 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026. Recurring tags: #milei, #andis, #argentina.

Compared with accounts its own size

Alberto Fernández's engagement rate beats 70% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,829 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 85% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.041%, Alberto Fernández sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,071 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.435%
p902.10%
p99158.3%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,071 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 105,527 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.435%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile158.3%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%71K
10:00 UTC-2%73K
11:00 UTC-3%80K
12:00 UTC-2%88K
13:00 UTC-2%96K
14:00 UTC-4%99K
15:00 UTC-2%103K
16:00 UTC-3%100K
17:00 UTC-2%92K
18:00 UTC-1%86K
19:00 UTC-2%81K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%67K
22:00 UTC-1%58K
23:00 UTC-1%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%234K
Monday0%294K
Tuesday-3%288K
Wednesday-1%253K
Thursday-2%247K
Friday-3%256K
Saturday+3%230K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 15, 202616x their median

    Un pueblo sin sol y con un presidente desquiciado, ni Stephen King imaginó esta trama.

    12K2.0K14520122K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 202614x their median

    "Todo esto de cuidar la tierra, del ambientalismo idiota, dicen que los seres humanos estamos rompiendo el planeta... ¿para que está el planeta entonces si no es para que lo rompamos? ¿para que se creó si no es para romperlo?". El perturbado de Milei aseguró que el planeta se creó para ser destruido y saqueado por los capitalistas, si Argentina sobrevive a este subser será un milagro.

    8.1K3.9K510356222K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 202613x their median

    “SIN INTERNET” Porque La Derecha Diario se habría quedado sin internet y no pudo informar sobre la detención de su socio Fernando Cerimedo por intento de femicidio. https://t.co/d1L4g1U2MT

    9.8K2.1K503585K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20268.1x their median

    Así como la oyen hablar, es la secretaria general de la Presidencia: no puede hilvanar una frase, confunde verbos, inventa tiempos y convierte "habramos" y "pudiéramos poder" en doctrina oficial. Que el país esté al mando de esta bestia bruta —a quien nadie votó— no es para preocuparse: es para meterse un corchazo.

    5.0K1.8K370130163K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20267.3x their median

    Milei me recomendó comparar sus resultados. Mirá lo que veo cuando lo hago…en 2023, 1 de cada 35 familias en mora. Hoy son 1 de cada 8 familias las que no pueden pagar sus deudas. El peor número en 20 años. Datos del Banco Central 🙄 https://t.co/oBYQjIpndL

    3.5K8142.1K128352K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20267.2x their median

    Así promocionaba Horacio Cabak la "academia" de Cerimedo https://t.co/V0hpTnmtSC

    4.6K1.6K160149499K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20265.8x their median

    Fernando Cerimedo, "El hombre MAGA en Latinoamérica" como lo llamó The Economist terminó acusado no solo de intento de feminicidio sino también enriquecimiento ilícito. Van a destaparse muchas cosas con este caso. https://t.co/G24EhsJfrj

    3.2K1.9K504329K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20265.5x their median

    Estos días te conté cuánto dinero (tuyo contribuyente) gastó el Gobierno pagando votos a cambio de leyes. Ahora te voy a contar cuánto cuesta impedir que una ley se sancione. El precio es bastante más caro… (abro hilo 🧵)

    3.5K1.4K25971K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20265.2x their median

    ESCANDALAZO: El exejecutivo de Techint, Pablo Daniel Brizzio declaró hoy en la causa Cuadernos. Dijo q no hubo problemas con Techint (SIDOR) de Venezuela, q los trabajadores salieron de Venezuela sin problemas y q nadie les pidió dinero. ¡Todo lo contrario de lo q dijo Techint en su momento!¡Que les habían pedido plata para sacar a sus trabajadores! Ademas, los pagos fueron de agosto a diciembre de 2008, y los trabajadores habían salido de Venezuela en junio. Siempre la sospecha fue q ejecutivos de Techint adujeron q pagaron coimas, pero en verdad se quedaron con la plata y ¡entraron al blanqueo del gobierno del PRO!

    3.1K1.5K552878K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20264.7x their median

    Cerró la única planta deshidratadora que Unilever tenía en el mundo 🇦🇷❌ 60 trabajadores más para la lista de los 285 mil empleos privados perdidos con Milei. Ubicada en Mendoza hace 60 años. Exportábamos a Brasil, México y Alemania. Un país sin industria es un país sin futuro. https://t.co/qVybYmFMIq

    2.7K1.3K1776597K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#milei#andis#argentina#colon#elonmusk

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 901 interactions against 2.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.041%. Measured over 49 original posts, its engagement rate beats 70% of 3,829 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 32K times each, and 2.82% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.46% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 49 posts sampled, 82% carry an image or video and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 14K interactions, about 16x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #milei, #andis, #argentina.

What is Alberto Fernández's engagement rate on X?
Alberto Fernández (@alferdez) has an engagement rate of 0.041%, based on the median interactions across 49 original posts from the last 30 days against 2,185,217 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.041%, Alberto Fernández sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,071 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @alferdez have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 70% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,829 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @alferdez post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 5.67 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going