Back to @amuse's profile

@amuse engagement report

@amuse - 685K followers on X

Measured over 98 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.096%
of 685K followers
Per impression
3.37%
19K views on a typical post
Reach
2.84%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
656
interactions (median)
Saved
0.087%
17 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.17/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 656 interactions against 685K followers, an engagement rate of 0.096%. Measured over 98 original posts, its engagement rate beats 70% of 3,862 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 19K times each, and 3.37% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.84% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 98 posts sampled, 92% carry an image or video, 5% are part of a thread and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 13K interactions, about 20x its own typical post.

Measured over 98 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026. Recurring tag: #bet.

Compared with accounts its own size

@amuse's engagement rate beats 70% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,862 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 84% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.096%, @amuse sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.081% to 0.439%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99158.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,582 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 105,409 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile158.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%52K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%62K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%74K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%89K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-4%101K
15:00 UTC-2%104K
16:00 UTC-3%102K
17:00 UTC-3%94K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%68K
22:00 UTC-2%59K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%237K
Monday0%300K
Tuesday-3%299K
Wednesday-1%256K
Thursday-1%249K
Friday-3%258K
Saturday+3%232K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Sep 1, 202620x their median

    Ken Paxton got a $250,000 donation from the chair of Texas Tech’s Board of Regents. The next day, he threatened to sue the Big 12 to protect Brendan Sorsby, the Tech quarterback who was caught illegally betting on his games.Β  Ken Paxton is the most corrupt politician in Texas. https://t.co/p3rCrZWSVK

    10K2.4K57774147K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 202619x their median

    OH CANADA: China has been stealing more than $60 billion in tariff revenue by laundering its exports through other countries. The biggest offender is Canada, and Mark Carney walked away from the trade talks to avoid upsetting the CCP by ending the scam.

    8.6K3.7K20618799K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 202615x their median

    The Government of Canada website has now been updated to Lake America Mark Carney's government is a complete joke https://t.co/TxXxA4ZRU2

    8.1K1.0K701175636K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202614x their median

    JUST IN: πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ Prime Minister Carney says Canada will restart trade talks with the US when "the Americans stop doing memes." https://t.co/FK3XetDzgp

    6.1K6211.9K574676K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202611x their median

    TEXAS SENATE RACE: The most shocking part of the revelation that James Talarico (CIS) had multiple sexual affairs with staffers is the fact that he had sex with women. Having sex with your subordinates is never acceptable - it is unethical, immoral, and in many cases violates the rules of the legislature and state and federal law. Meanwhile, having two consensual relationships over the course of eight years of marital separation may technically fall under the definition of adultery; it is something every Texan can understand.

    4.8K2.3K33810682K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20267.5x their median

    CENSORSHIP: The "Stop Nick Shirley Act" that makes it illegal to post videos of fraud against taxpayers is now law. Democrats decided to stop independent journalists from investigating fraud instead of stopping the fraud. https://t.co/Ifi6Z2udtQ

    3.1K1.6K21410629K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20266.1x their median

    OH CANADA: It is wild how much control China has over Canada today. Carney and his party have been so compromised by the CCP they would rather bankrupt their nation than risk being exposed by China. https://t.co/CSpuOYzGjQ

    3.0K897651926K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20265.3x their median

    IRAN: The IRGC's decision to put a $10M bounty on Barron Trump's head, along with publishing details about his location and security detail, seems like a VERY bad idea. https://t.co/5WvPuwHaU7

    2.5K7791094632K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20264.9x their median

    CRIME: It is almost like the Democrats want criminals to walk free. How else can you explain how Biden's FBI had a backlog of 1.81 million DNA testing samples? The FBI collects 50K new samples each month - Director Patel just cleared the backlog, ensuring criminals are brought to justice and the innocent identified and cleared.

    2.5K68829620K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20264.7x their median

    COVERUP: Why did Democrats look the other way while Eric Swalwell was taking bribes from China? https://t.co/4OxAGad8Kq

    2.4K5591341723K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#bet

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 656 interactions against 685K followers, an engagement rate of 0.096%. Measured over 98 original posts, its engagement rate beats 70% of 3,862 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 19K times each, and 3.37% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.84% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 98 posts sampled, 92% carry an image or video, 5% are part of a thread and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 13K interactions, about 20x its own typical post.

What is @amuse's engagement rate on X?
@amuse (@amuse) has an engagement rate of 0.096%, based on the median interactions across 98 original posts from the last 30 days against 684,527 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.096%, @amuse sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @amuse have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 70% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,862 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @amuse post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.17 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going