Babylon engagement report
@babylonlabs_io - 432K followers on X
Measured over 30 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 79 interactions against 432K followers, an engagement rate of 0.018%. Measured over 30 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 3,862 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 0.67% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.73% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 30 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video, 33% are part of a thread and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 441 interactions, about 5.6x its own typical post.
Measured over 30 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Babylon's engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,862 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 41% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.018%, Babylon sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,459 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.081%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.081% |
| 75th percentile | 0.438% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 159.8% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 52K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 53K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 51K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 55K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 44K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 43K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 49K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 53K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 62K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 71K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 74K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 81K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 89K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 97K |
| 14:00 UTC | -3% | 100K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 104K |
| 16:00 UTC | -4% | 101K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 94K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 87K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 82K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 77K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 68K |
| 22:00 UTC | -1% | 59K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 53K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 236K |
| Monday | 0% | 298K |
| Tuesday | -3% | 295K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 255K |
| Thursday | -1% | 249K |
| Friday | -3% | 257K |
| Saturday | +3% | 231K |
Best tweets
- Jul 28, 20265.6x their median
🚨BREAKING: The first half of 2026 was the most hacked six months in crypto history. 212 exploits drained $1.1 BILLION, 3.4x more incidents than all of 2025. North Korea's Lazarus Group was behind 55% of all losses, roughly $609 MILLION. Their two biggest hits, KelpDAO ($292M) and Drift Protocol ($285M), totaled 577M. Compromised private keys caused 74% of all dollar losses. The Blockaid security report also flagged the first ever AI prompt injection exploit, where an attacker tricked an AI agent into approving a $216K transaction.
- Aug 11, 20261.7x their median
So what’s different about native Bitcoin-backed borrowing on @aave v4? 1. Transparent, competitive on-chain borrowing rates. 2. Your Bitcoin stays on Bitcoin - no wrapping or bridging. 3. No intermediary holds your BTC. Try our Public Testnet. https://t.co/4o3Dal7PJb
- Aug 6, 20261.6x their median
"You retain your title. Self-custodial, trustless, no bridging, no wrapping. Everything is verified cryptographically. Trust cryptography, don't trust other people." Babylon co-founder @dntse walks through the @aave v4 flow: deposit Bitcoin, borrow USDC, repay, and your BTC unlocks automatically. The breakthrough is BABE which allows ZK-proofs be verified efficiently on Bitcoin.
- Aug 13, 20261.6x their median
“Trust cryptography. Don’t trust other people.” @dntse explains how native Bitcoin can be used as collateral to borrow on @aave v4 without wrapping, bridging or relying on centralized intermediaries. https://t.co/ksNl5sv5Jp
- Aug 5, 2026
Deposit native Bitcoin as collateral, not so difficult! @VladDegen, Babylon's DeFi Product Lead, walks us through how to deposit your native Bitcoin on our Public Testnet for native Bitcoin-backed borrowing. Join the Public Testnet with @aave v4: https://t.co/vABTcHMQC2
- Aug 15, 2026
"This is the healthiest the crypto and Web3 market has been in years. Because what will be left after all this is you're left with adults." CJ Fong of @GSR_io on Double Down, Babylon's Bitcoin podcast. Consolidation is another beginning of the story. It's also the entry ticket for institutions. Watch the full conversation on Babylon's youtube channel.
- Aug 10, 2026
.@dntse explains why TBV's first product targets lending with @aave v4 on @ethereum . "Building a real product means focusing on getting market feedback, validating the technology by doing one thing very well first. That’s why we are going after the biggest lending market and the biggest blockchain for smart contract."
- Aug 7, 2026
The Vault is back with the new host @jk_remote sits down with Babylon's CTO @vitsalis. We are unpacking: - why using native Bitcoin as collateral has been such a difficult technical problem - what trade-offs wrapped and bridged Bitcoin have - how TBV keeps native Bitcoin while making it usable as collateral on Ethereum. Watch the full episode👇
- Aug 10, 2026
You’ve got your native Bitcoin collateral, now it’s time to borrow against it. @VladDegen, Babylon's DeFi Product Lead, show you how to borrow supported assets on @aave v4 and repay. Join the Public Testnet with @aave v4: https://t.co/JRX6Pk3NAu https://t.co/T5BhXGwhpT
- Aug 7, 2026
.@baby_fisherman , Babylon's co-founder, expands on the range of applications native Bitcoin collateral can support: > Borrowing other assets > Bitcoin-backed stablecoins > Selling covered calls & deploying structured strategies > Insurance reserve https://t.co/yvFfWVaGRc
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 79 interactions against 432K followers, an engagement rate of 0.018%. Measured over 30 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 3,862 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 0.67% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.73% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 30 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video, 33% are part of a thread and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 441 interactions, about 5.6x its own typical post.
- What is Babylon's engagement rate on X?
- Babylon (@babylonlabs_io) has an engagement rate of 0.018%, based on the median interactions across 30 original posts from the last 30 days against 431,857 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.018%, Babylon sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,459 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @babylonlabs_io have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,862 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @babylonlabs_io post?
- Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2 posts per day across the measured window.