Back to @beautyshowcase's profile

PrettyGirls engagement report

@beautyshowcase - 630K followers on X

Measured over 76 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.413%
of 630K followers
Per impression
3.77%
69K views on a typical post
Reach
11.0%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.6K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.549%
380 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.6/day
active 53% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 2.6K interactions against 630K followers, an engagement rate of 0.413%. Measured over 76 original posts, its engagement rate beats 89% of 4,293 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 69K times each, and 3.77% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 76 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 52K interactions, about 20x its own typical post.

Measured over 76 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

PrettyGirls's engagement rate beats 89% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (4,293 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 86% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.413%, PrettyGirls sits above the 50th percentile of the 41,462 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.083% to 0.446%.

p100.002%
p250.013%
p50 (median)0.083%
p750.446%
p902.07%
p99143.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 41,462 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 89,920 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.013%
50th percentile0.083%
75th percentile0.446%
90th percentile2.07%
99th percentile143.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%58K
01:00 UTC-2%59K
02:00 UTC-3%57K
03:00 UTC-4%61K
04:00 UTC-6%49K
05:00 UTC-4%48K
06:00 UTC-5%55K
07:00 UTC-4%59K
08:00 UTC-4%69K
09:00 UTC-4%80K
10:00 UTC-3%83K
11:00 UTC-3%90K
12:00 UTC-2%99K
13:00 UTC-2%108K
14:00 UTC-4%111K
15:00 UTC-2%115K
16:00 UTC-4%112K
17:00 UTC-3%104K
18:00 UTC-2%97K
19:00 UTC-2%92K
20:00 UTC-1%86K
21:00 UTC-1%76K
22:00 UTC-2%65K
23:00 UTC-1%59K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%254K
Monday+2%326K
Tuesday-2%350K
Wednesday-4%312K
Thursday-2%265K
Friday-3%274K
Saturday+3%248K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 28, 202620x their median

    Rack of the month ๐Ÿ† https://t.co/GjJmrpEegY

    50K1.1K670241.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202616x their median

    Elite build ๐Ÿ† https://t.co/5uxSEQkAYq

    40K79959510714M viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20268.2x their median

    This is what a 10/10 looks like ๐Ÿ† https://t.co/IIAqUmwXPc

    20K4335474011M viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20265.4x their median

    Spanish ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ https://t.co/Bfj137y8Bz

    13K28627110254K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20265.2x their median

    Rosie Huntington Whiteley ๐Ÿด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ https://t.co/w2IhGph2HH

    13K290449397K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20264.7x their median

    Italian ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น https://t.co/vNCOPEjray

    12K1205412686K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20264.4x their median

    Rack of the day ๐Ÿ† https://t.co/2ea2K53CmM

    11K2101292294K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20264.1x their median

    Women who are a little fat like this >> https://t.co/ZG6MSrt6yG

    10K2262197326K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20263.9x their median

    Ashley Serrano (Cuban ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡บ) https://t.co/gPRru7vVSV

    9.9K287497179K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20263.4x their median

    Women who are a little fat like this >>> https://t.co/XUJzi0OLvS

    8.4K1901749249K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.6K interactions against 630K followers, an engagement rate of 0.413%. Measured over 76 original posts, its engagement rate beats 89% of 4,293 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 69K times each, and 3.77% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 76 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 52K interactions, about 20x its own typical post.

What is PrettyGirls's engagement rate on X?
PrettyGirls (@beautyshowcase) has an engagement rate of 0.413%, based on the median interactions across 76 original posts from the last 30 days against 629,573 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.413%, PrettyGirls sits above the 50th percentile of the 41,462 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @beautyshowcase have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 89% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (4,293 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @beautyshowcase post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.6 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going