Back to @bindelj's profile

Julie Bindel engagement report

@bindelj - 143K followers on X

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.094%
of 143K followers
Per impression
1.38%
9.7K views on a typical post
Reach
6.78%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
134
interactions (median)
Saved
0.052%
5 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.97/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 134 interactions against 143K followers, an engagement rate of 0.094%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 52% of 21,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.7K times each, and 1.38% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.77% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 23% carry an image or video, 8% are part of a thread and 69% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 866 interactions, about 6.5x its own typical post.

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Julie Bindel's engagement rate beats 52% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 50% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.094%, Julie Bindel sits above the 25th percentile of the 218,826 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.149%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.149%
p750.706%
p902.63%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 218,826 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 21,715 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.149%
75th percentile0.706%
90th percentile2.63%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video23% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link69% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 23% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 69% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 259 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 21, 20266.5x their median

    With the news out of Finland re the harms of puberty blockers, and the survey which has established that the majority of the Dutch disagree with the Dutch Protocol, here is a reminder of how utterly batshit Iceland is re gender ideology (gift token): https://t.co/ZYNx9Z1JyD

    6721817614K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20264.1x their median

    1/3 The thing about the lesbian bar story is, aside from Covid and the internet, this all happened before! When I first met the wombyn type lesbians (of which I was not one), at the end of the 1970s, they were pulling stunts like that then!!! They all had M.E., which I called

    4972419584K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20263.8x their median

    "Officers showed up at the property but MacGregor told them the call was a mistake and she was safe in Brennan's company." AND Police had been called before - the murderer had previous convictions Poor Brodie. How she must have suffered. I hope he rots. https://t.co/ZjAc8woB0R

    442609011K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20263.2x their median

    This is spot on: https://t.co/ZLvcUBHAwo

    337768522K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20262.6x their median

    I was invited to speak at a fringe meeting at the Labour party conference on the usual, and disinvited when I explained how angry and disgusted I was with the rank and file. I think I would have added something, but cults are going to cult I suppose...🙄

    308299132K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20262.4x their median

    Re crazed lesbians - this is me and the long-suffering one, celebrating at the end of the 1980s when lesbian identity politics was declared colonised by the Differently Abled Community: https://t.co/1htxBCxrcS

    309711112K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 2026

    https://t.co/rdSrejQtTA LOL from the brilliant @BoozeAndFagz (as ever). She is right, of course, although I will always fancy Camilla over Diana: "I’ve had a few feuds in my time – like any fascinating woman – but one of the funniest was when I fell out with my comrade, Julie Bindel. We were both women of working-class origin propelled to the giddy heights of media notoriety, and I had always felt that we vied to see who could remain truest to our proletarian roots. Then, with one stroke, conclusively, I had won – because I backed Diana after the ‘Three of us in this marriage’ interview with Martin Bashir, while Bindel backed Camilla. We laugh about it now, but at the time, at my instigation, we didn’t talk for five years."

    113111009.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 2026

    Andrea Dworkin would have celebrated her 80th birthday today. I really miss her: https://t.co/P8ub0TwKlF

    6913506.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 2026

    In this month's @TheCriticMag I have an interview with @Katy_Faust (who campaigns to repeal equal marriage). Ignore her at your peril! https://t.co/PCQHq8cKnF

    6612716.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 2026

    🚨FAA IN-PERSON EVENT - GET YOUR TICKETS HERE📢 LONDON, THURSDAY 22ND OCTOBER We are delighted to host Rethinking Feminism After 7 October with @karajesella @NimkoAli and @bindelj in collaboration with @centre_as as we launch Kara Jesella’s new book Feminist Antisemitism: An Intellectual History. As questions of race, privilege and power have moved to the centre of feminist politics, Jewish women have been recast as symbols of whiteness; and privilege, despite a long history of exclusion, discrimination and persecution. Why is antisemitism within feminism often treated differently from other forms of prejudice? What does that mean for the future of feminism? And is there a place for Jewish women in feminism anymore? GET YOUR TICKETS HERE https://t.co/WL62KDSzDN

    3815436.1K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 134 interactions against 143K followers, an engagement rate of 0.094%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 52% of 21,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.7K times each, and 1.38% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.77% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 23% carry an image or video, 8% are part of a thread and 69% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 866 interactions, about 6.5x its own typical post.

What is Julie Bindel's engagement rate on X?
Julie Bindel (@bindelj) has an engagement rate of 0.094%, based on the median interactions across 13 original posts from the last 30 days against 143,323 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.094%, Julie Bindel sits above the 25th percentile of the 218,826 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @bindelj have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 52% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @bindelj post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.97 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going