Back to @briebriejoy's profile

Briahna Joy Gray engagement report

@briebriejoy - 435K followers on X

Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.131%
of 435K followers
Per impression
1.56%
37K views on a typical post
Reach
8.39%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
568
interactions (median)
Saved
0.156%
57 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.53/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 568 interactions against 435K followers, an engagement rate of 0.131%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 72% of 3,899 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 37K times each, and 1.56% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.39% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 73% carry an image or video, 7% are part of a thread and 47% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 31K interactions, about 54x its own typical post.

Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Briahna Joy Gray's engagement rate beats 72% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,899 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 63% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.131%, Briahna Joy Gray sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,701 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.081% to 0.439%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99156.3%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,701 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 104,204 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile156.3%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%53K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%52K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%63K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%75K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%90K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-3%101K
15:00 UTC-2%105K
16:00 UTC-4%102K
17:00 UTC-3%95K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%69K
22:00 UTC-2%60K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%238K
Monday0%302K
Tuesday-3%302K
Wednesday-1%257K
Thursday-2%250K
Friday-3%259K
Saturday+3%233K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Oct 11, 202454x their median

    Obama knew every historical detail of the Zionist takeover of Palestine, could quote you chapter and verse on the history of that settler colonial catastrophe, and then he sold out to AIPAC and the war machine like every other white supremacist to hold that office. Disgusting.

    26K4.5K2331672.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202610x their median

    Police are racist bullies, and I'm sick of it https://t.co/ZjWlBOKWBw

    4.3K1.2K242150190K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20267.3x their median

    Briahna Joy Gray argues that the political debate over “defund the police” has been deliberately narrowed to whether the phrase is electorally damaging and what the wording means, rather than whether its underlying policy should be defended. Gray argues that “defund could not be more literal,” and says opponents have succeeded in pushing politicians to debate the phrase instead of explaining or defending their previous support for “defund the police.” She points to continued growth in police budgets since 2020 and argues that the underlying case for “defunding” is “one of the easiest things to prove and support.” @briebriejoy | @FDsignifier

    3.4K50216073684K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20265.0x their median

    reporter to Malcolm X: "Do you feel however that we're making progress in this country and worldwide?" https://t.co/Xsxbep0l4k

    2.3K4591619100K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20262.3x their median

    It's time for the people to have a new contract with America: ➡️$25 minimum wage ➡️Billionaires paying their share in taxes ➡️Universal access to health care ➡️Good union jobs & dignity for everybody in our country In Congress, I will fight for you: https://t.co/GF2e9tzmAD https://t.co/m7aAM23Ujz

    920265130615K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20262.2x their median

    Police is a very new concept. Like it’s younger than the United States of America. So the idea that police abolition even has to become defund in the first place was already the liberals co-opting the movement and even that has become a step too far.

    9991894216116K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20261.7x their median

    Let's run AOC for President 🌹 She's the best candidate to beat establishment Democrats in the primary, and MAGA in the general. https://t.co/beonKoF5iX

    4027138486160K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20261.5x their median

    “As a citizen, I’d prefer to have cameras everywhere as a deterrent and to solve crime.” One finance guy to another at an airport bar. The other one: “Yeah, Google already knows everything that happens in my house.” We’re cooked.

    7636919616K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 2026

    Alec Karakatsanis argues that when the left retreats from Black Lives Matter-era demands, both parties capitalize on backlash to expand police power—enabling far-right “law-and-order” policies. https://t.co/sycHXbtFgE

    40514321846K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 2026

    ‼️About That Letter (w/ @vijayprashad)‼️ "I would like to challenge the actual people who drafted this letter to show me proof that Mumia & others signed the letter." Is the recent Guardian letter controversy evidence of efforts to undermine the anti-imperialist left? Is the electoral-faction of the DSA complicit? Marxist historian Vijay Prashad weighs in: https://t.co/dYKEDl6wvj

    3539019631K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 568 interactions against 435K followers, an engagement rate of 0.131%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 72% of 3,899 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 37K times each, and 1.56% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.39% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 73% carry an image or video, 7% are part of a thread and 47% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 31K interactions, about 54x its own typical post.

What is Briahna Joy Gray's engagement rate on X?
Briahna Joy Gray (@briebriejoy) has an engagement rate of 0.131%, based on the median interactions across 15 original posts from the last 30 days against 435,059 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.131%, Briahna Joy Gray sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,701 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @briebriejoy have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 72% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,899 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @briebriejoy post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.53 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going