Back to @carv_official's profile

CARV engagement report

@carv_official - 822K followers on X

Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.003%
of 822K followers
Per impression
0.212%
12K views on a typical post
Reach
1.43%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
25
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.07/day
active 80% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 25 interactions against 822K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 21% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 0.212% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.43% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 74% carry an image or video and 22% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12K interactions, about 463x its own typical post.

Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

CARV's engagement rate beats 21% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 17% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.003%, CARV sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.433%
p902.10%
p99160.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,654 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,977 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.433%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-3%98K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-1%57K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%231K
Monday0%288K
Tuesday-2%278K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%245K
Friday-3%253K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jul 21, 2026463x their median

    12m crypto followers. 🙏 Crypto is not going away. AI will need to use money. You will need money. 🤷‍♂️ https://t.co/LEWT4ZevLm

    8.6K9201.8K252583K viewsView on X
  • Jul 16, 202650x their median

    Over $52,000,000 spent by agents using x402 https://t.co/CEg2netuyD

    90312816750302K viewsView on X
  • Aug 1, 202648x their median

    LATEST: 🤖 Tom Lee says a "highly intelligent payment system" for AI agents is less than 5 years away, predicting it will be crypto's next mainstream breakout. https://t.co/h2QxqgMGiM

    92010016327218K viewsView on X
  • Jul 1, 202644x their median

    https://t.co/2wqeMIJguO

    76816312039107K viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 20262.8x their median

    Cyera agrees to acquire Oasis Security for $1B to safeguard proliferating AI agents https://t.co/y8j22JLTWW

    4898562K viewsView on X
  • Jun 4, 20262.8x their median

    Owning an identity in a virtual world sounds abstract. You already shop, pay, and live online — so why would "sovereignty" change anything for you? Because convenience was never the point. Ownership is. https://t.co/xsVzHuganp

    29142613.2K viewsView on X
  • Jun 12, 20262.4x their median

    Unified identity turns scattered blockchain data into clear, decision-ready context for AI agents. This fusion supports real-time insights, smarter actions, and autonomous growth in decentralized ecosystems. https://t.co/jsyvaCGzH3

    25132203.7K viewsView on X
  • Jun 1, 20261.9x their median

    As AI agents begin to outnumber humans, Agent KYA will become a critical layer of the agent economy. The D.A.T.A Framework makes agent identity, behavior, performance, and reputation verifiable on-chain — turning trust from a claim into a programmable asset. https://t.co/bpNfxUln5y

    2691214.0K viewsView on X
  • Jul 4, 20261.8x their median

    The AI intelligence that win the next cycle won't be the smartest. They'll be the most trusted. Drop the one you'd let cook 👇

    27127012K viewsView on X
  • Jun 26, 20261.8x their median

    AI agents are the biggest narrative in crypto right now. CARV's been building for it for years. 9M+ identities and counting. Connect the dots. https://t.co/H2zGUXi6GW

    3194011K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 25 interactions against 822K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 21% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 0.212% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.43% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 74% carry an image or video and 22% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12K interactions, about 463x its own typical post.

What is CARV's engagement rate on X?
CARV (@carv_official) has an engagement rate of 0.003%, based on the median interactions across 23 original posts from the last 30 days against 821,727 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.003%, CARV sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @carv_official have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 21% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @carv_official post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going