Back to @chestermissing's profile

Chester Missing engagement report

@chestermissing - 386K followers on X

Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.027%
of 386K followers
Per impression
1.01%
10K views on a typical post
Reach
2.70%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
105
interactions (median)
Saved
0.01%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.77/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
10:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 105 interactions against 386K followers, an engagement rate of 0.027%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 32% of 3,810 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 10K times each, and 1.01% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.70% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.77 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 27% carry an image or video and 14% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.7K interactions, about 35x its own typical post.

Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Chester Missing's engagement rate beats 32% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,810 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 43% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.027%, Chester Missing sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,960 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.435%
p902.10%
p99159.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,960 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,518 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.435%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile159.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%73K
11:00 UTC-3%79K
12:00 UTC-2%87K
13:00 UTC-2%96K
14:00 UTC-4%99K
15:00 UTC-2%102K
16:00 UTC-3%99K
17:00 UTC-2%92K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-2%80K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%67K
22:00 UTC-2%58K
23:00 UTC-1%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%233K
Monday0%292K
Tuesday-3%284K
Wednesday-1%253K
Thursday-2%246K
Friday-3%255K
Saturday+3%229K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jun 16, 202635x their median

    March and March tried to moer a puppet. Good luck with that. https://t.co/rY6RqZHucM

    2.9K6221385795K viewsView on X
  • Jul 30, 202621x their median

    Sorry Nelflix, I am cancelling. Madlanga has more comedy and more drama.

    2.0K25018729K viewsView on X
  • Apr 23, 20267.9x their median

    Ramaphosa's given us a new acting police commissioner. Matter of days before we find out she was at a bring & braai at Cat Matlala's house.

    62517723522K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20267.8x their median

    Fadiel Adams wants a postponement so he can look at the evidence that he himself provided. Clearly this dude's brain also needs to be checked by parliament's IT department.

    67012618612K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20266.8x their median

    Now parliament says they know nothing about Fadiel's laptop. Imagine picking a fight with the IT department at your work on national television.

    5959820212K viewsView on X
  • Jun 7, 20266.0x their median

    Key points in Ramaphosa's speech: 1) South Africans are NOT xenophobic. 2) South Africans must stop being xenophobic.

    441142391019K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20265.5x their median

    Fadiel Adams says he didn't get the commission's email because his laptop is kak. No wonder people have to slip things under his door.

    4877417422K viewsView on X
  • Apr 22, 20265.5x their median

    South African news. https://t.co/a7R92AhmQh

    4121539814K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20265.4x their median

    South Africa is so cold even Fadiel Adams' laptop is freezing.

    4866914212K viewsView on X
  • Jun 15, 20264.3x their median

    Imagine South Africans were as passionate about decent healthcare, getting jobs, a growing & fair economy, housing, a functional police & justice system, etc, as they are about some Malawian bra with dodgy paperwork. Hilarious.

    227581531823K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 105 interactions against 386K followers, an engagement rate of 0.027%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 32% of 3,810 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 10K times each, and 1.01% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.70% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.77 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 27% carry an image or video and 14% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.7K interactions, about 35x its own typical post.

What is Chester Missing's engagement rate on X?
Chester Missing (@chestermissing) has an engagement rate of 0.027%, based on the median interactions across 22 original posts from the last 30 days against 385,870 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.027%, Chester Missing sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,960 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @chestermissing have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 32% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,810 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @chestermissing post?
Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.77 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going