Back to @compliantvc's profile

Henrick Johansson engagement report

@compliantvc - 1.2M followers on X

Measured over 60 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.016%
of 1.2M followers
Per impression
0.576%
33K views on a typical post
Reach
2.71%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
190
interactions (median)
Saved
0.02%
6 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.03/day
active 87% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 190 interactions against 1.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.016%. Measured over 60 original posts, its engagement rate beats 41% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 33K times each, and 0.576% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.69% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 60 posts sampled, 65% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 41K interactions, about 218x its own typical post.

Measured over 60 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Henrick Johansson's engagement rate beats 41% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 36% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.016%, Henrick Johansson sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.434%
p902.10%
p99160.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,521 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,166 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.434%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%69K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%100K
16:00 UTC-3%97K
17:00 UTC-2%90K
18:00 UTC-1%84K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%230K
Monday0%286K
Tuesday-2%276K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%244K
Friday-3%252K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 16, 2026218x their median

    California's Highway https://t.co/13iz56u0k4

    37K3.4K3739548.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 2026120x their median

    Mark Zuckerberg faces questions after his $300 million superyacht reportedly declined to help stranded boat A nearby boat ran out of fuel in Alaska and reportedly received no response from Zuckerberg’s yacht after repeated calls for help https://t.co/MZysFKefF9

    21K1.0K8801861.2M viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 202652x their median

    A Chinese bullet train just broke the acceleration world record by going from 0 to 800 km/h (497.10 mph) in 5 seconds https://t.co/MYRMOSU0lb

    9.2K311126130331K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 202648x their median

    I'm in favor of a 35% wealth tax on billionaires Think about it: Billionaires really don't need most of their money But the average person could put that money to good use 35% wealth tax = the average citizen of that country gets 35% richer instantly Imagine how much better off a struggling single mother would be with 35% more money to invest in her children Not sure how anyone can oppose this

    835398.1K250493K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 202634x their median

    SpaceX is getting very close to building the first serious base on the Moon Starship changes the entire equation It is designed to deliver up to 100 tonnes directly to the lunar surface - enough to transport habitats, rovers, power systems, construction equipment and everything needed to begin building a permanent outpost Then the other pieces come together Tesla Optimus robots could eventually unload cargo, assemble structures, move equipment and perform dangerous construction work before large human crews arrive Building a base mostly with humans is a serious limitation Humans need life support, pressurized habitats, spacesuits, oxygen, food and protection just to survive and work on the lunar surface But with Tesla Optimus, that equation changes entirely Tesla’s experience with solar energy, batteries, autonomous vehicles and large-scale manufacturing can support the power and transportation systems required on the Moon SpaceX provides transportation Tesla provides energy, autonomy and robotics Starship provides the scale Suddenly building a serious base on the Moon becomes dramatically easier And once that infrastructure is ready, humans can stay for much longer periods and eventually even routine private lunar missions and tourism become possible Once the first permanent lunar outpost is established, its usefulness will compound rapidly.....supporting science, resource development, communications and deeper missions into space The Moon could become humanity’s first true outpost beyond Earth

    4.7K7767892156.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202627x their median

    Canada will start "intense discussions with the European Union, the worlds second largest economy, to build a much stronger and deeper economic and security partnership" https://t.co/gg1efbdh98

    4.4K6199772164K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 202627x their median

    100 years made a difference in Beijing (1926 and 2026). https://t.co/1sVfsYA16U

    4.5K5078234296K viewsView on X
  • Apr 29, 202616x their median

    I had the pleasure to sit down with @MartinShkreli A truly formidable young man We didn’t talk about pharma We talked about cookie banners (& his favorite rules in prison) Also spoke about his new venture: Godel He agreed to let me invest €100 (pending regulatory approval) https://t.co/K9USx0CHcl

    2.5K124324862.2M viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20269.1x their median

    "The Euro isn't backed by anything!!" Then explain this: https://t.co/liQdK9csIl

    1.6K6622839K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20266.4x their median

    Europe is officially renaming the Atlantic Ocean to the GDPR Ocean of European Innovation And there's nothing America can do about it https://t.co/xRMd97Xgg4

    1.1K6345541K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 190 interactions against 1.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.016%. Measured over 60 original posts, its engagement rate beats 41% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 33K times each, and 0.576% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.69% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 60 posts sampled, 65% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 41K interactions, about 218x its own typical post.

What is Henrick Johansson's engagement rate on X?
Henrick Johansson (@compliantvc) has an engagement rate of 0.016%, based on the median interactions across 60 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,231,489 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.016%, Henrick Johansson sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @compliantvc have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 41% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @compliantvc post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going